This is LuxembourgLover's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

It is 5:54 PM where this user lives.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Hi LuxembourgLover! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:21, Monday, November 20, 2023 ( UTC)

I have again reverted your edit on History of Luxembourg. It was again a copy&paste from Luxembourg rebellions, except that you added a source that does not back up the claim. Sorry. The Banner  talk 16:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC) reply

how does the source not back up the claim. The event is well sourced the the article. Why don't you just fix the problem and not revert all the edits. LuxembourgLover ( talk) 18:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Texas tower shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guns in the United States.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi LuxembourgLover. I'm not sure if you already know this or not, so apologies if you do, but as an extended-confirmed editor in good standing you have access to Newspapers.com through WP:The Wikipedia Library. This may help you with drafts like Draft:Hector C. Haight. Cheers, Curbon7 ( talk) 07:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Wow! This has been super helpfull for my drafts. Thanks, LuxembourgLover ( talk) 18:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, LuxembourgLover. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lego Winter Village Collection, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi there. You say in the description of File:AI-Generated Venn Diagram Comparing the Morrisite War and the Waco Siege.png that ChatGPT generated the diagram for you.

If you're also using ChatGPT to generate paragraphs text for Wikipedia articles, the current advice at Wikipedia:Large language models#Disclosure is that this should be stated in the edit summary.

If there's any past content you've added that you think should be flagged as AI-generated, you can add the {{ AI-generated|date=May 2024|certain=yes}} template to the top of the relevant article or {{ AI-generated|section|date=May 2024|certain=yes}} to the top of the section that contains such text. Belbury ( talk) 11:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Would i be able to keep the picture in the venn diagram article if i correctly flag it? LuxembourgLover ( talk) 15:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC) reply

That diagram is completely irrelevant to that article. The Banner  talk 15:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC) reply

It's a venn diagram, how is it irrelevant? It shows how AI power has grown and can create venn diagrams. LuxembourgLover ( talk) 15:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Can I get some clarification from you on whether edits like this one and that one were written with the assistance of an AI chatbot? Thanks. -- Belbury ( talk) 18:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I was looking at a newspaper and gave it to the AI, I wrote the original information but I used AI for spelling and grammar check. LuxembourgLover ( talk) 18:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Please state in edit summaries in future when an AI has helped you to write text content. If you have written an ungrammatical sentence and an AI has made its best guess as to what you may have meant by it, you may be introducing errors into Wikipedia. Belbury ( talk) 18:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Alright thanks. LuxembourgLover ( talk) 18:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey, hope things are going well, I found a good source here that would be good for the Utah Territorial Militia. It has lots of good information on the types of weapons used by the Utah Territorial Militia Epachamo ( talk) 05:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

That is a good source, good find. If you want to help me, I’m looking for public domain pictures for the Lot Smith Cavalry Company and the Morrisite War. LuxembourgLover ( talk) 20:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I understand that you want to make the article Grand Ducal Gendarmerie (Luxembourg) as spectacular as possible but by no means can you call the Luxemburg rebellions a battle. A power struggle is not the same as a battle. Please stop adding incorrect information. The Banner  talk 23:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.

M.Bitton ( talk) 22:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

You have violated WP:1RR on 7 October attacks. [1] [2] Your first edit constitutes a revert of this edit. Please self-revert. Skitash ( talk) 22:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable, but sounds like it was written by AI. Wording like "continuing his longstanding dedication to his faith and proselytizing duties" is not appropriate in a Wikipedia article. Please rewrite the article in the neutral point of view.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hector C. Haight and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 21:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, LuxembourgLover! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 21:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, LuxembourgLover. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Go West".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj ( talk) 12:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply