Hello. My name is EGL1234. I agree with you edit to Little Nightmares II, but it was unnecessary to instruct the ip user to "fuck off". I have insted pasted a vandalism template on his/her talk page. Next time please do that. EGL1234 ( talk) 06:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Little Nightmares 2 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 04:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Lutesque! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
In reviewing some of your edits of the Little Nightmares II article, I would like to ask that you refrain from using vulgarity and abusive comments in the edit summaries. You can make the same statements without resorting to such discourtesy. As far as the content of your edits are concerned, I'm not weighing in on their productivity. Just please, be mindful of what you type in the edit summary, please and thank you. — Christopher, Sheridan, OR ( talk) 06:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Why did you revert the edit, without even explaining it no less? It misses one character. Watch the show and its credits again maybe? -- CapoFantasma97 ( talk) 15:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
IronManCap (
talk)
18:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Suicide Squad (film). Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 19:55, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, please discuss on Talk:Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe) your reasoning for removing the sentence stating Thanos is the antagonist of Infinity War and Endgame so that we can come to a consensus. Please do not remove that again without doing so, thanks. Bloodyboppa ( talk) 16:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Doctor Octopus. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Forensic Kidology ( talk) 14:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Octopus, you may be blocked from editing. Forensic Kidology ( talk) 14:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Bane in other media shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Now cut it out. You've got 7 days to discuss it at the talk page to come to some sort of agreement or your likely to get blocked for edit warring if you start up again.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
21:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Sal Maroni. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Unnamed anon ( talk) 21:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly
harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. For
this edit summary.
Drmies (
talk)
01:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
02:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Capsulecap. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Comicsgate seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Capsulecap (
talk •
contribs)
04:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
I did not say that Charles and Darlington would actually show up again, but that would not matter right now, just that they were credited as main for that one Primal episode: “ The Primal Theory”. They were not guest stars, they were the actual protagonists of that episode, and so should be listed as part of the Main cast. 103.104.117.205 ( talk) 17:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a bit surprised to have to say this to someone who has been editing for two years, but you must cite reliable sources for everything you add to articles. At Saruman you have now twice added wholly uncited claims. This is obviously not acceptable, either on the WikiProject or indeed anywhere on Wikipedia. I hope I will not be obliged to mention the matter again. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
Sorry for reverting your edit on How to Train your Dragon 3. I have not taken physics courses yet and I was using knowledge I had gotten from Minecraft. Sorry dude. HiGuys69420 ( talk) 23:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries or comments, as you did to
Predator (film). Your edit summary or comment may have been removed. Please communicate with
civility and refrain from making
personal attacks. Thank you.
Andrzejbanas (
talk)
15:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
BioShock. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky ( talk) 23:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
BioShock. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK
04:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
ferret (
talk)
12:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Hello. My name is EGL1234. I agree with you edit to Little Nightmares II, but it was unnecessary to instruct the ip user to "fuck off". I have insted pasted a vandalism template on his/her talk page. Next time please do that. EGL1234 ( talk) 06:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Little Nightmares 2 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 04:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Lutesque! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
In reviewing some of your edits of the Little Nightmares II article, I would like to ask that you refrain from using vulgarity and abusive comments in the edit summaries. You can make the same statements without resorting to such discourtesy. As far as the content of your edits are concerned, I'm not weighing in on their productivity. Just please, be mindful of what you type in the edit summary, please and thank you. — Christopher, Sheridan, OR ( talk) 06:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Why did you revert the edit, without even explaining it no less? It misses one character. Watch the show and its credits again maybe? -- CapoFantasma97 ( talk) 15:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
IronManCap (
talk)
18:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Suicide Squad (film). Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 19:55, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, please discuss on Talk:Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe) your reasoning for removing the sentence stating Thanos is the antagonist of Infinity War and Endgame so that we can come to a consensus. Please do not remove that again without doing so, thanks. Bloodyboppa ( talk) 16:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Doctor Octopus. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Forensic Kidology ( talk) 14:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Octopus, you may be blocked from editing. Forensic Kidology ( talk) 14:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Bane in other media shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Now cut it out. You've got 7 days to discuss it at the talk page to come to some sort of agreement or your likely to get blocked for edit warring if you start up again.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
21:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Sal Maroni. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Unnamed anon ( talk) 21:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly
harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. For
this edit summary.
Drmies (
talk)
01:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
02:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Capsulecap. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Comicsgate seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Capsulecap (
talk •
contribs)
04:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
I did not say that Charles and Darlington would actually show up again, but that would not matter right now, just that they were credited as main for that one Primal episode: “ The Primal Theory”. They were not guest stars, they were the actual protagonists of that episode, and so should be listed as part of the Main cast. 103.104.117.205 ( talk) 17:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a bit surprised to have to say this to someone who has been editing for two years, but you must cite reliable sources for everything you add to articles. At Saruman you have now twice added wholly uncited claims. This is obviously not acceptable, either on the WikiProject or indeed anywhere on Wikipedia. I hope I will not be obliged to mention the matter again. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
Sorry for reverting your edit on How to Train your Dragon 3. I have not taken physics courses yet and I was using knowledge I had gotten from Minecraft. Sorry dude. HiGuys69420 ( talk) 23:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries or comments, as you did to
Predator (film). Your edit summary or comment may have been removed. Please communicate with
civility and refrain from making
personal attacks. Thank you.
Andrzejbanas (
talk)
15:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
BioShock. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky ( talk) 23:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
BioShock. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK
04:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
ferret (
talk)
12:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)