...
Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an Arbcom restriction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, many thanks for your hint, I thought this was common practice. The linking of dates without a special importance (e.g. maybe "1968") is indeed not very useful.
Lupus648 (
talk)
16:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- It was common practice until recently. Anyway, happy editing! Dabomb87 ( talk) 16:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
|
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lithuanian Union of Russians, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- This is duplication: see Union of the Russians of Lithuania. The other article is older (see history); so I'd support deleting and/or redirecting the new one to the stub with longer page history.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Miacek (t) 10:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I have opened a discussion here to which I wish to draw your attention. This is a friendly notice under the auspices of WP:CANVASS. Regards, Anameofmyveryown ( talk) 03:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, nice to see that there are new users interested in the same field that I am. I think you might consider adding something about you on your userpage. Usually, people add a babel box (languages they speak), or just drop a few words about themselves. Best regards, -- Miacek (t) 20:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Miacek, many thanks for your kind message. It is indeed very nice to meet users with the same interests. A small user page is more or less in progress, but for now it is of less importance for me. I wish to draw your attention to this: Talk:Just Russia. I don't want to reverse your last edit about the ideology of Just Russia, nevertheless - for me - it seems to be a little bit problematical. Best regards. Lupus648 ( talk) 20:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello, in this edit you deleted a large amount of referenced data, I dont see any discussion or consensus on this, http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_political_parties_in_Kosovo&direction=next&oldid=425425574 please, can you explain? thanks, mike
- Hi Mike, the original list of political parties was an indiscriminate collection of data, it - so I think - did not fit to Wikipedia standards. Relevant parties and micro parties (that partly did not contest any election) were confusingly mixed. I split the list into major/minor/Serbian and minority parties and deleted the almost irrelevant micro parties. This micro parties were neither explained nor had an own article (they were "linked" but the links were only useless redirects to the main list). Relevant referenced data did not disappear. Nevertheless I recently added some of the small minority parties that at least contested the 2010 election. Best regards, Lupus648 ( talk) 14:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moldovan parliamentary election, 2009 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Croatian Christian Democratic Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivan Cesar ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Ukraine Barnstar | |
| I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for writing
Peasant Party of Ukraine! Usually it is me who creates articles about Ukrainian political parties and it is nice to know I do not
WP:OWN this subject. 2 know more then 1! Also thanks for the news that the
Socialist Party of Ukraine was kicked out of the
Socialist International; 2 miss less news then 1! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC) |
- Many thanks :-) Lupus648 ( talk) 13:24, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/PDS
Template:German politics/party colours/PDS has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Gonnym (
talk)
08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/REP
Template:German politics/party colours/REP has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Gonnym (
talk)
08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/SSW
Template:German politics/party colours/SSW has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Gonnym (
talk)
08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
...
Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an Arbcom restriction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, many thanks for your hint, I thought this was common practice. The linking of dates without a special importance (e.g. maybe "1968") is indeed not very useful.
Lupus648 (
talk)
16:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- It was common practice until recently. Anyway, happy editing! Dabomb87 ( talk) 16:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
|
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lithuanian Union of Russians, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- This is duplication: see Union of the Russians of Lithuania. The other article is older (see history); so I'd support deleting and/or redirecting the new one to the stub with longer page history.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Miacek (t) 10:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I have opened a discussion here to which I wish to draw your attention. This is a friendly notice under the auspices of WP:CANVASS. Regards, Anameofmyveryown ( talk) 03:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, nice to see that there are new users interested in the same field that I am. I think you might consider adding something about you on your userpage. Usually, people add a babel box (languages they speak), or just drop a few words about themselves. Best regards, -- Miacek (t) 20:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Miacek, many thanks for your kind message. It is indeed very nice to meet users with the same interests. A small user page is more or less in progress, but for now it is of less importance for me. I wish to draw your attention to this: Talk:Just Russia. I don't want to reverse your last edit about the ideology of Just Russia, nevertheless - for me - it seems to be a little bit problematical. Best regards. Lupus648 ( talk) 20:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello, in this edit you deleted a large amount of referenced data, I dont see any discussion or consensus on this, http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_political_parties_in_Kosovo&direction=next&oldid=425425574 please, can you explain? thanks, mike
- Hi Mike, the original list of political parties was an indiscriminate collection of data, it - so I think - did not fit to Wikipedia standards. Relevant parties and micro parties (that partly did not contest any election) were confusingly mixed. I split the list into major/minor/Serbian and minority parties and deleted the almost irrelevant micro parties. This micro parties were neither explained nor had an own article (they were "linked" but the links were only useless redirects to the main list). Relevant referenced data did not disappear. Nevertheless I recently added some of the small minority parties that at least contested the 2010 election. Best regards, Lupus648 ( talk) 14:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moldovan parliamentary election, 2009 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Croatian Christian Democratic Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivan Cesar ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Ukraine Barnstar | |
| I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for writing
Peasant Party of Ukraine! Usually it is me who creates articles about Ukrainian political parties and it is nice to know I do not
WP:OWN this subject. 2 know more then 1! Also thanks for the news that the
Socialist Party of Ukraine was kicked out of the
Socialist International; 2 miss less news then 1! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC) |
- Many thanks :-) Lupus648 ( talk) 13:24, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/PDS
Template:German politics/party colours/PDS has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Gonnym (
talk)
08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/REP
Template:German politics/party colours/REP has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Gonnym (
talk)
08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/SSW
Template:German politics/party colours/SSW has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Gonnym (
talk)
08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)