![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
Archives |
---|---|
2006 | |
2007 | |
2008 | |
2009 | |
2010 | |
2011 | |
2012 | |
2013 | |
2018 | |
2019 | |
2020 | |
2021 | |
Conversations are archived manually |
This Archive Page goes from 1/3/2009 to 31/3/2009 (dd/mm/yyyy)
Previous conversations prior to 1 March 2009 (UTC) are archived there.
New IP ( 83.94.221.20 ( talk · contribs)), old tricks ( [1], [2]). -- Miacek and his crime-fighting dog ( woof!) 14:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
My page has been deleted for a "redirect", but I check all they links and they're fine (in the cache). Can I get the code again so I can put it back up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Memekiller ( talk • contribs) 21:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Greetings,
You authorized an upgraded level of protection on the Bill Gates page. Please refer to the picture and its caption. Furthermore, refer to the "source" of which the caption is authenticated. This is outrageous! I expect that the Bill Gates' page will be returned to a non-biased page.
Thank you for your time,
Bjlayland ( talk) 21:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Hope you do not mind, but I refactored your message here. It appears that your original {{ schoolblock}} template had a "}" where a "|" should have been [3]. Please feel free to revert my changes if you feel they are inappropriate. Thanks, Kralizec! ( talk) 12:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements Thanks! S B H arris 00:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to know how to follow up on additional suspected sock puppets if an investigation is closed. I'm asking in regards to the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Captainclegg/Archive. While the user has been unbanned with the understanding that he would not continue such action, I and another user suspect he has created another sock puppet. WesleyDodds ( talk) 23:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I have NOT created any other sock puppets and I have sent the following to the talk pages of the people who have been accused of being such: Thank you for your support, but it would appear that you may actually be doing me accidental and indirect harm by such action. Some people are convinced you are a "sockpuppet" (see respective talk pages). I would be very grateful if you would please confirm that you and I are not connected in any way. Please don't take this personally, but I gave my word that I would not create any further accounts or break any Wikipedia rules and I don't break my word. I am not sure who you should direct your confirmation to, but there are certain editors who seem to have it in for me, so please would you start with them. Thank you for your support & consideration. Please understand that I meant what I said, but I have no way of proving that I am NOT someone! Please help. Captainclegg ( talk) 02:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Bonjour, pourrais-tu s.v.p. me dire quelle était la source qui était mentionnée pour l'image Latvian_2_euro_coin_design.JPG que tu as supprimée ? Car sa copie sur Commons, Latvian 2 euro coin old design.JPG, ne donnait comme source que la page de description de l'image maintenant supprimée de en-WP. Il faudrait donc pouvoir retrouver la source d'origine. Ainsi que le nom de l'artiste et autres informations de description le cas échéant. (Attention : sur Commons, il ne s'agit pas de l'image Latvian 2 euro coin design.JPG, qui est une image différente et dont la source ne permet pas de retrouver celle de la première.) Merci. -- Asclepias ( talk) 01:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
It was last month that the page was undeleted, now it is under speedy deletion again. How can I prevent users who don't bother to read the entire page contents from making frivolous speedy deletion? - User:Jacob Poon 17:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
No problem; although it is fair to point out that the checkuser confirmation was made by a checkuser who was not the blocking admin; that there are several sockpuppets listed as down to the same user, some with extremely similar names; and virtually all sockpuppetteers fiercely proclaim their innocence. -- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 12:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Lucasbfr, I often check back at AIV when I report something to make sure I'm doing the right things. I recently reported: 82.108.171.178. I saw that you (blocked 1 year, 1 month, 4 days, 3 hours). I figured out the 31 hour school block (they can't edit the next night - cause it would be past their bedtime). I was wondering if there was anything significant to the block you put in - or was it just a "go away for a long time" kind of thing? Dumb question I guess, and not really important - but when you work on an encyclopedia project - ya have to figure that folks are gonna be curious ... lol. Have a good one ;) — Ched ~ (yes?)/ © 10:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
What is the suspicion of sockpuppetry backed up by? What other accounts do you believe are similar? Mango juice talk 22:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Someone (I think I Know Who) has created this duplicate page yet again and it's just getting stupid now. Is it possible for somone (you maybe?) to lock this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhydfelen and prehaps http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ysgol_Gyfun_Rhydfelen as a precaution. Thanks a bunch -- Glenny127 ( talk) 23:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for lifting my blokc! ^_^ -- The Wandering Traveler ( talk) 11:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! Just curious, is thare any particular reason you use such unusal block lengths? I was about to block an IP for 6 months or so, and then you blocked them for 1 year, 1 month, 4 days, 3 hours. Not a criticism, just curious! -- Ged UK 11:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Logo france2 2008.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Lucasbfr!
You might have a look at User_talk:NawlinWiki#usabilitywiki. There has also appeared an impersonator of you. Kind regards, — DerHexer (Talk) 11:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I've identified further ranges belonging to the netblocks in this case. Mayalld ( talk) 12:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I recently tried to migrate seven images to Commons, but the CommonsHelper transfer did not work correctly. I believe there were two images which had multiple versions in their history, but in all cases, only the most recent version was actually migrated.
I was in the process of seeking support when you deleted one of the images in question: File:1971 Hangovers in Bermuda.jpg
As I understand it, part of the deletion process is that the deleter is obligated to manually confirm that all data (including past versions of the image) have been transferred properly, so I was not expecting this to be an issue, or else I would have reverted the changes the script made to the Wikipedia version of the image page.
Can the Wikipedia version of the image page be restored?
Best, Notyourbroom ( talk) 14:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking about asking for my page to be semi'd. But the one good thing about leaving it as-is, if Liebman's posting on my page then maybe he's not posting on someone else's. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 20:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
He's part of the incoming 4chan vandalism on those articles. I decided to give him a 4im solely because he was part of the influx. It's up to you if you want to block him, I just thought you should know the full story. Matty ( talk) 09:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Sir. Please unblock me (e.g. Capasitor)- I was unfairly blocked a by a prejudiced admin. I noticed the case of you unblocking a user although his IP was similar to another user. [4]. Please see this archived block for reference: [5] Capasitor2 ( talk) 23:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent blocking of 75.174.61.152, however this is a proxy account and has used 75.174.69.88 in the past, a range block would therefore be appreciated, thanks Spitfire Tally-ho! 20:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just a small note to say thanks for uploading the full version of the above file... I should have caught that when I added in the info! Kind regards from Commons, Deadstar ( talk) 07:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
Archives |
---|---|
2006 | |
2007 | |
2008 | |
2009 | |
2010 | |
2011 | |
2012 | |
2013 | |
2018 | |
2019 | |
2020 | |
2021 | |
Conversations are archived manually |
This Archive Page goes from 1/3/2009 to 31/3/2009 (dd/mm/yyyy)
Previous conversations prior to 1 March 2009 (UTC) are archived there.
New IP ( 83.94.221.20 ( talk · contribs)), old tricks ( [1], [2]). -- Miacek and his crime-fighting dog ( woof!) 14:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
My page has been deleted for a "redirect", but I check all they links and they're fine (in the cache). Can I get the code again so I can put it back up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Memekiller ( talk • contribs) 21:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Greetings,
You authorized an upgraded level of protection on the Bill Gates page. Please refer to the picture and its caption. Furthermore, refer to the "source" of which the caption is authenticated. This is outrageous! I expect that the Bill Gates' page will be returned to a non-biased page.
Thank you for your time,
Bjlayland ( talk) 21:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Hope you do not mind, but I refactored your message here. It appears that your original {{ schoolblock}} template had a "}" where a "|" should have been [3]. Please feel free to revert my changes if you feel they are inappropriate. Thanks, Kralizec! ( talk) 12:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements Thanks! S B H arris 00:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to know how to follow up on additional suspected sock puppets if an investigation is closed. I'm asking in regards to the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Captainclegg/Archive. While the user has been unbanned with the understanding that he would not continue such action, I and another user suspect he has created another sock puppet. WesleyDodds ( talk) 23:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I have NOT created any other sock puppets and I have sent the following to the talk pages of the people who have been accused of being such: Thank you for your support, but it would appear that you may actually be doing me accidental and indirect harm by such action. Some people are convinced you are a "sockpuppet" (see respective talk pages). I would be very grateful if you would please confirm that you and I are not connected in any way. Please don't take this personally, but I gave my word that I would not create any further accounts or break any Wikipedia rules and I don't break my word. I am not sure who you should direct your confirmation to, but there are certain editors who seem to have it in for me, so please would you start with them. Thank you for your support & consideration. Please understand that I meant what I said, but I have no way of proving that I am NOT someone! Please help. Captainclegg ( talk) 02:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Bonjour, pourrais-tu s.v.p. me dire quelle était la source qui était mentionnée pour l'image Latvian_2_euro_coin_design.JPG que tu as supprimée ? Car sa copie sur Commons, Latvian 2 euro coin old design.JPG, ne donnait comme source que la page de description de l'image maintenant supprimée de en-WP. Il faudrait donc pouvoir retrouver la source d'origine. Ainsi que le nom de l'artiste et autres informations de description le cas échéant. (Attention : sur Commons, il ne s'agit pas de l'image Latvian 2 euro coin design.JPG, qui est une image différente et dont la source ne permet pas de retrouver celle de la première.) Merci. -- Asclepias ( talk) 01:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
It was last month that the page was undeleted, now it is under speedy deletion again. How can I prevent users who don't bother to read the entire page contents from making frivolous speedy deletion? - User:Jacob Poon 17:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
No problem; although it is fair to point out that the checkuser confirmation was made by a checkuser who was not the blocking admin; that there are several sockpuppets listed as down to the same user, some with extremely similar names; and virtually all sockpuppetteers fiercely proclaim their innocence. -- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 12:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Lucasbfr, I often check back at AIV when I report something to make sure I'm doing the right things. I recently reported: 82.108.171.178. I saw that you (blocked 1 year, 1 month, 4 days, 3 hours). I figured out the 31 hour school block (they can't edit the next night - cause it would be past their bedtime). I was wondering if there was anything significant to the block you put in - or was it just a "go away for a long time" kind of thing? Dumb question I guess, and not really important - but when you work on an encyclopedia project - ya have to figure that folks are gonna be curious ... lol. Have a good one ;) — Ched ~ (yes?)/ © 10:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
What is the suspicion of sockpuppetry backed up by? What other accounts do you believe are similar? Mango juice talk 22:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Someone (I think I Know Who) has created this duplicate page yet again and it's just getting stupid now. Is it possible for somone (you maybe?) to lock this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhydfelen and prehaps http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ysgol_Gyfun_Rhydfelen as a precaution. Thanks a bunch -- Glenny127 ( talk) 23:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for lifting my blokc! ^_^ -- The Wandering Traveler ( talk) 11:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! Just curious, is thare any particular reason you use such unusal block lengths? I was about to block an IP for 6 months or so, and then you blocked them for 1 year, 1 month, 4 days, 3 hours. Not a criticism, just curious! -- Ged UK 11:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Logo france2 2008.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Lucasbfr!
You might have a look at User_talk:NawlinWiki#usabilitywiki. There has also appeared an impersonator of you. Kind regards, — DerHexer (Talk) 11:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I've identified further ranges belonging to the netblocks in this case. Mayalld ( talk) 12:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I recently tried to migrate seven images to Commons, but the CommonsHelper transfer did not work correctly. I believe there were two images which had multiple versions in their history, but in all cases, only the most recent version was actually migrated.
I was in the process of seeking support when you deleted one of the images in question: File:1971 Hangovers in Bermuda.jpg
As I understand it, part of the deletion process is that the deleter is obligated to manually confirm that all data (including past versions of the image) have been transferred properly, so I was not expecting this to be an issue, or else I would have reverted the changes the script made to the Wikipedia version of the image page.
Can the Wikipedia version of the image page be restored?
Best, Notyourbroom ( talk) 14:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking about asking for my page to be semi'd. But the one good thing about leaving it as-is, if Liebman's posting on my page then maybe he's not posting on someone else's. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 20:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
He's part of the incoming 4chan vandalism on those articles. I decided to give him a 4im solely because he was part of the influx. It's up to you if you want to block him, I just thought you should know the full story. Matty ( talk) 09:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Sir. Please unblock me (e.g. Capasitor)- I was unfairly blocked a by a prejudiced admin. I noticed the case of you unblocking a user although his IP was similar to another user. [4]. Please see this archived block for reference: [5] Capasitor2 ( talk) 23:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent blocking of 75.174.61.152, however this is a proxy account and has used 75.174.69.88 in the past, a range block would therefore be appreciated, thanks Spitfire Tally-ho! 20:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just a small note to say thanks for uploading the full version of the above file... I should have caught that when I added in the info! Kind regards from Commons, Deadstar ( talk) 07:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)