Ludamad ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Indefinite bans are a bit of BS. I was 15. I'm 23 now.
Decline reason:
So suggest to us a reason you should be unblocked; hoax articles, after all, a a great big bit of BS, and that's pretty much all you did before you were blocked. --jpgordon ::==( o ) 13:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I was 15 @_@. Are you anything like you were when you were 15? But OK, as a formality...
Ludamad ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
OK, sure, I didn't word that the best. If I did want to make more hoax articles, I'd be wasting my time opening this account :-). I should be unblocked because I've matured in the 8 years since and could just as easily make a new account, but want to keep my internet name. I care about this internet name, and wouldn't want to vandalize Wikipedia with it anyway. I have a lot of input now into articles in computer science and linguistics, and regularly do cleanup anonymously. Recently, I saw a wording improvement to be made on a semi-protected article, and wanted to go through the steps necessary to fix semi-protected articles (other articles I don't really need an account).
Accept reason:
While technically editing without an account is considered block evasion, I agree that we can give you a second chance. Wording improvements are beneficial, too. Huon ( talk) 05:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks all.
Ludamad ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Indefinite bans are a bit of BS. I was 15. I'm 23 now.
Decline reason:
So suggest to us a reason you should be unblocked; hoax articles, after all, a a great big bit of BS, and that's pretty much all you did before you were blocked. --jpgordon ::==( o ) 13:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I was 15 @_@. Are you anything like you were when you were 15? But OK, as a formality...
Ludamad ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
OK, sure, I didn't word that the best. If I did want to make more hoax articles, I'd be wasting my time opening this account :-). I should be unblocked because I've matured in the 8 years since and could just as easily make a new account, but want to keep my internet name. I care about this internet name, and wouldn't want to vandalize Wikipedia with it anyway. I have a lot of input now into articles in computer science and linguistics, and regularly do cleanup anonymously. Recently, I saw a wording improvement to be made on a semi-protected article, and wanted to go through the steps necessary to fix semi-protected articles (other articles I don't really need an account).
Accept reason:
While technically editing without an account is considered block evasion, I agree that we can give you a second chance. Wording improvements are beneficial, too. Huon ( talk) 05:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks all.