The problem is that this templates uses the As of template, which can not handle this format with dates, just monthname and year. To be more precise, the template can handle it, but not the categorisation. In fact, I found this page in Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template. I had to undo your change. I have updated the documentation to remove all dates and specify that only month and year should be used. Debresser ( talk) 12:39, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
The real source of the problem is the format of {{
As of}}, which diverges from the usual dateformat of all other mainenance template. The usual format is |date=July 2024
, while {{
As of}} uses {{
As of|Year|MonthName|Day}}
.
Debresser (
talk)
12:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- I understand / Thanks for the help. I'll work around the given template... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.105.204.243 ( talk) 21:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I will have a look through the article and let you know, i have already spotted some issues that i will highlight shortly. Cheers Zoo Pro 04:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks I really appreciate them - one thing that kinda worries me is the neutrality...
This is a pretty good set of articles. I think we should be considering the main article for GA Candidate. The intro needs to be expanded, the "History" section needs to be turned into a narrative (summary), and we need to lose the gallery as "just" a place to put pictures (this role is now handled by commons), but otherwise I think this pretty much qualifies. Gallery pictures, if they illustrate a point, can be placed in the narrative. I will take a closer look over the next couple of weeks. I will not have time to help with this for the next month or so, but after that I would be willing to help answer GA issues during a push. Donlammers ( talk) 12:36, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
I have done some minor work today. I added Zoos templates to all the Zoo Basel sub-articles I spotted and did a preliminary assessment so that they appear in the WP Zoos quality listings. Also, these need better cross-linking with each other -- maybe a nav template at the bottom or something. I will think about this a bit and look around for precedents (I've not really dealt with a "set" of articles before). Donlammers ( talk) 12:36, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
I can assure you it will not be deleted however it does need some tweaking to take out some of the pro words such as
I hope this helps. Zoo Pro 00:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Lucasuvu!
I have use a photo of Suricata suricatta from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" ( http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33847
If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Lucasuvu
This is my "contributor card", for example:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!
Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón
-- Fernando.lison ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The article List of animals at Zoo Basel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fram (
talk)
09:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The problem is that this templates uses the As of template, which can not handle this format with dates, just monthname and year. To be more precise, the template can handle it, but not the categorisation. In fact, I found this page in Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template. I had to undo your change. I have updated the documentation to remove all dates and specify that only month and year should be used. Debresser ( talk) 12:39, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
The real source of the problem is the format of {{
As of}}, which diverges from the usual dateformat of all other mainenance template. The usual format is |date=July 2024
, while {{
As of}} uses {{
As of|Year|MonthName|Day}}
.
Debresser (
talk)
12:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- I understand / Thanks for the help. I'll work around the given template... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.105.204.243 ( talk) 21:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I will have a look through the article and let you know, i have already spotted some issues that i will highlight shortly. Cheers Zoo Pro 04:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks I really appreciate them - one thing that kinda worries me is the neutrality...
This is a pretty good set of articles. I think we should be considering the main article for GA Candidate. The intro needs to be expanded, the "History" section needs to be turned into a narrative (summary), and we need to lose the gallery as "just" a place to put pictures (this role is now handled by commons), but otherwise I think this pretty much qualifies. Gallery pictures, if they illustrate a point, can be placed in the narrative. I will take a closer look over the next couple of weeks. I will not have time to help with this for the next month or so, but after that I would be willing to help answer GA issues during a push. Donlammers ( talk) 12:36, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
I have done some minor work today. I added Zoos templates to all the Zoo Basel sub-articles I spotted and did a preliminary assessment so that they appear in the WP Zoos quality listings. Also, these need better cross-linking with each other -- maybe a nav template at the bottom or something. I will think about this a bit and look around for precedents (I've not really dealt with a "set" of articles before). Donlammers ( talk) 12:36, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
I can assure you it will not be deleted however it does need some tweaking to take out some of the pro words such as
I hope this helps. Zoo Pro 00:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Lucasuvu!
I have use a photo of Suricata suricatta from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" ( http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33847
If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Lucasuvu
This is my "contributor card", for example:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!
Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón
-- Fernando.lison ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The article List of animals at Zoo Basel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fram (
talk)
09:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)