Hello, Lucas gonze, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 05:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Now (Lucas again) editing again, still in Tor, after logging out, to test anonymous editing in Tor.
2A00:801:4F:2105:B:480B:5BD5:D9C6 ( talk) 23:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Editing page from Tor to test non-anonymous editing from Tor.
There's nothing special about this talk page, it's just a handy sandbox.
Lucas gonze ( talk) 23:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Webjay.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly ( Parrot) 20:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
This issue was resolved after Polly's note was posted.
-- Lucas gonze ( talk) 11:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
Lucas Gonze, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Robofish ( talk) 23:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
The article Timothy Caughman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
smileguy91
talk -
contribs
04:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
It is common for victims of notable crimes to have their lives documented in an article under their own name, rather than under the heading of their killing. For example the lynching victims /info/en/?search=Henry_Smith_(lynching_victim) and /info/en/?search=Anthony_Crawford_(lynching_victim).
This stands to reason because otherwise the killer defines the person's reputation in death. This extends the violence against that person. This is particularly important with regard to victims of racist crimes because dehumanization was an important factor in the assault.
Lucas gonze ( talk) 05:21, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
The easy part of these tasks is improving the writing. I will work on that first. After that I will see if I can make a convincing case to have the article be about the life rather than the death.
Hello, Lucas gonze, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 05:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Now (Lucas again) editing again, still in Tor, after logging out, to test anonymous editing in Tor.
2A00:801:4F:2105:B:480B:5BD5:D9C6 ( talk) 23:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Editing page from Tor to test non-anonymous editing from Tor.
There's nothing special about this talk page, it's just a handy sandbox.
Lucas gonze ( talk) 23:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Webjay.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly ( Parrot) 20:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
This issue was resolved after Polly's note was posted.
-- Lucas gonze ( talk) 11:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
Lucas Gonze, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Robofish ( talk) 23:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
The article Timothy Caughman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
smileguy91
talk -
contribs
04:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
It is common for victims of notable crimes to have their lives documented in an article under their own name, rather than under the heading of their killing. For example the lynching victims /info/en/?search=Henry_Smith_(lynching_victim) and /info/en/?search=Anthony_Crawford_(lynching_victim).
This stands to reason because otherwise the killer defines the person's reputation in death. This extends the violence against that person. This is particularly important with regard to victims of racist crimes because dehumanization was an important factor in the assault.
Lucas gonze ( talk) 05:21, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
The easy part of these tasks is improving the writing. I will work on that first. After that I will see if I can make a convincing case to have the article be about the life rather than the death.