I'm seeing quite a few low-quality sources in the article. This is a biography of a living person. I have very little doubt that Matt Walsh is notable, but the article needs to be cleaned up to be brought into the mainspace. The use of future tense to describe perpetual behaviors of Walsh is generally informal, while there seems to be quite a bit of spin in the way many of the sources are used. In general, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV command that we write what our sources say, no more and no less. We do not that we look at our sources, analyze them, and then write something that is different than they claim (original research/synthesis) nor do we present article subjects in a way that the tone of the reliable sources don't actually support (POV spinning). This needs substantial work.