Hello, Lroyperfecto. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Paul Oakenfold, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{ edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Graham87 ( talk) 03:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Wburrow. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Paul Oakenfold without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Wburrow (
talk)
15:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Re:
this edit summary: no, that's not how it works. We sum up what
reliable sources say about a subject; we don't try to present them in a good light. If you continue editing without disclosing any connection you may have to Oakenfold, you may be blocked.
Graham87 (
talk)
08:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I already said I'm a fan. I don't think people realize how terrible accusations are and how they can affect celebrity careers. I've worked with celebrities in the past, and seeing when something is only an accusation, no proof, and seeing the work they lose, it's terrible. Especially when nothing is proven and the accusation is just an accusation. If anything else comes to light, then of course it should be shown to the world, but this is just words that I'm sure hurt. If someone accused you of doing something terrible, and then it was broadcasted to the world, and put on your Wikipedia page, and you know you didn't do it, how would you feel? 81.4.150.38 ( talk) 05:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Lroyperfecto. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Paul Oakenfold, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{ edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Graham87 ( talk) 03:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Wburrow. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Paul Oakenfold without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Wburrow (
talk)
15:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Re:
this edit summary: no, that's not how it works. We sum up what
reliable sources say about a subject; we don't try to present them in a good light. If you continue editing without disclosing any connection you may have to Oakenfold, you may be blocked.
Graham87 (
talk)
08:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I already said I'm a fan. I don't think people realize how terrible accusations are and how they can affect celebrity careers. I've worked with celebrities in the past, and seeing when something is only an accusation, no proof, and seeing the work they lose, it's terrible. Especially when nothing is proven and the accusation is just an accusation. If anything else comes to light, then of course it should be shown to the world, but this is just words that I'm sure hurt. If someone accused you of doing something terrible, and then it was broadcasted to the world, and put on your Wikipedia page, and you know you didn't do it, how would you feel? 81.4.150.38 ( talk) 05:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)