Doug Weller talk 19:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Taiwan. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —
MarkH21
talk 23:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Doug Weller
talk 12:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Louis Sarwal ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello, "Doug Weller", I would agree that I am "clearly" not here to build an encyclopedia. Neither, of course are you. We are both here to EDIT an encyclopedia, to make it better than the base it was built on. We are both here for the same purpose, and I would like to kindly ask you to unblock me. Thank you, "Louis Sarwal"
Decline reason:
Sampling your edits, I found that your edits generally made the Wikipedia worse, not better. For example, how on earth was this edit remotely helpful and not just outright vandalism? Yamla ( talk) 21:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your user page at User:Louis Sarwal also makes it clear your aim is to actively harm Wikipedia. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 04:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Doug Weller talk 19:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Taiwan. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —
MarkH21
talk 23:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Doug Weller
talk 12:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Louis Sarwal ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello, "Doug Weller", I would agree that I am "clearly" not here to build an encyclopedia. Neither, of course are you. We are both here to EDIT an encyclopedia, to make it better than the base it was built on. We are both here for the same purpose, and I would like to kindly ask you to unblock me. Thank you, "Louis Sarwal"
Decline reason:
Sampling your edits, I found that your edits generally made the Wikipedia worse, not better. For example, how on earth was this edit remotely helpful and not just outright vandalism? Yamla ( talk) 21:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your user page at User:Louis Sarwal also makes it clear your aim is to actively harm Wikipedia. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 04:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))