![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
List of characters from Hollyoaks, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~~
[ジャム][
t -
c
07:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary for your edits. Thank you. ~~
[ジャム][
t -
c
00:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (LostHavoc) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome! ~~
[ジャム][
t -
c
00:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. In the Hollyoaks template ({{ Hollyoaks}}), please avoid introducing characters that haven't been introduced into the show yet. For example, Cheryl, who doesn't arrive until May. Also, the list is ordered by surname, so for characters that don't have a surname, please just list them in the main list by order of their first name. See my edit for a better explanation of what I mean. ~~ [ジャム][ t - c 09:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I would like to know whether the beast was hurt by Jack's gunshot. Please reply on my talk page. -- Tyw7 ( Talk • Contributions) 00:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Whoniverse93. Would you mind weighing in on this discussion? Flyer22 ( talk) 01:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for preserving this material by moving it from an unneeded stand alone article to a list of characters. I encourage you to continue to do this type of merge in the future. However, you need to make sure to properly document all merges by doing the following:
These steps are necessary to properly comply with our content licensing terms. In particular be sure to wikilink the source article in the edit summary that completes the merge. Otherwise it isn't clear where the content came from.
I have gone ahead and fixed your edits relating to Grace Hutchinson, so you don't have to worry about it there. If you have any questions feel free to reply here or on my talk page. Thank you, ThaddeusB ( talk) 01:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
OMG; sorry!
LovesHollyoaksxoxo
I need to get on my soapbox. But why were you saying that Craig & John Paul were engaged but broke up but are now boyfriends? They were NEVER engaged! & sorry I just like to edit!
LovesHollyoaksxoxo
Thanks for uploading File:SamanthaRowley060.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ( ESkog)( Talk) 11:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SairaChoudhry016.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ( ESkog)( Talk) 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:GemmaBissix764.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ( ESkog)( Talk) 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Looks good. Feel free to remove the big red "no source" tags. ( ESkog)( Talk) 15:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
You can't be serious. The image you uploaded, it's not even Hannah. It's Emma Rigby. What was wrong with the image of Hannah Ashworth? That actually had the right image tags. All your images end up deleted anyway, so this was basically vandalism advertising a fansite called 'Hollyoaksbabes.net' so it cannot be a screenshot of a TV programme. Your other edits to the article were not helpful either. Raintheone ( talk) 00:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello after our recent resolved problem we had I thought I'd ask you your opinions on a few matters. All the hollyoaks character pages are just pointless storyline archives like I previously said, with you and me being two of a very small amount of members that make notable edits to these articles, do you think Hollyoaks should have it's own wikiproject? We can then gather the editors that do these massive storyline edits and help them make only edits that have reason to them. A massive clean up is in order as I'm sure you know, one of the problems is coming from the main page, which is crap basically. It needs a read like Eastenders tbh. Character articles one day will need to read like Pauline Fowler.. . Any ideas how we could do that, assuming your interested. =) Raintheone ( talk) 13:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:GemmaBissix764.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 21:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:HannahAshworth2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 21:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SamanthaRowley060.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 21:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
You've uploaded some images such as the one of Clare Devine which is tagged again. It really needs taking of, the tag that is. Oh and when your editing character development sections, original research such as in the article Tony Hutchinson is okay, because were viewers and we know that's how he acts and what he is like, but a new reader would not and with there being no references cited it could be challenged to be removed if it remains uncited/unverifiable. The character articles on a whole are generally looking better, plenty more condensing of the storylines is needed on many but we'll get thatc sorted. Oh and the project, hows that going? Raintheone ( talk) 20:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JakeDean.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 14:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing the Romances field from the John Paul McQueen and Craig Dean character infoboxes whenever IPs and maybe even registered editors add them back? Yes, Template: Infobox soap character does have a Romances field. Flyer22 ( talk) 22:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
I also do not mean to sound harsh, but the infobox you are designing ( Template:Infobox Hollyoaks character), with all those family fields, is a bad idea. Why create all those fields...but reject a Romances field? Flyer22 ( talk) 23:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
If Sarah has " come out" as a lesbian, she should be classified as one. I have not watched where she "comes out" yet, but I just looked at one of the older versions of this article, where the lead used to state this and where you reverted someone who placed her in the lesbian category. Her having been with men romantically/sexually does not necessarily mean that she is " bisexual" (as the Bisexuality article notes) and that she is not a lesbian or should not be classified as a lesbian.
I will mainly leave the Hollyoaks articles to you, because I do not currently have the time to clean a lot of them up and am not as familiar with the history of this show as you are. But when I see something within any of them that needs correcting, I will seek to have whatever it is corrected. Flyer22 ( talk) 23:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For you tireless work on Hollyoaks character related articles. You have improved so much and are making great edits to them. Raintheone ( talk) 22:24, 21 September 2009 (UTC) |
I did not expect one back. We have both been working hard on the articles, but you more so. As you know I tend to work on Coronation Street articles the most. But Hollyoaks are a big plan for my editing in the future. Just latley though you have made amazing edits to them. You made good edits ad mostly in re-creating Leila, Ravi and Anita's article pages. They are a agood read and hold notability. The images are great now too! I don't know where you are finding these good quality images from. =) Raintheone ( talk) 23:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
So I'm going to make the three new students articles when there is enough stuff about. Suprisingly there is though. I've made Charlotte Lau, just thought I'd mention it. You have hger on your userpage as a redirect. Dave will be easy because his character was a focal point of a government funded spin off to raise the awareness of binge drinking. With India there must be plenty of stuff because of the open audtioning they held. I'll do Hayley to if you like. I noticed you are going to rewrite Nancy Hayton though, what's wrong with that? Raintheone ( talk) 16:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Why did you revert the Dr Who page and tag as vandalism the edits made by User:Ccacsmss. It looked good faith to me, but... I am learning which I why I am curious as to the vandalism tag. thanks -- Alchemist Jack ( talk) 01:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Oh god I'm crap at spoting mistakes. I can write the article, but damn I can't always use grammar! Glad you watch what I'm doing. Lol... I was just about to do more of the students but Hollyoaks have deleted Load and Go which had a tonne of information on Dave and India! So I just thought, lets do Loretta. Oh and Hayley's article will be completed by tonight also. Raintheone ( talk) 22:15, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I like Dave and India's pages! Were totally ploughing through these now. Some hard jobs ahead with condensing storylines down for the likes of Jacqui McQueen, Darren Osbourne and the like. Are we the only doing this within the project btw? Raintheone ( talk) 00:12, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I've just been editing more info in on Zak's page.... Zachary Timothy "Zak" Ramsey <--- how annoying are full names no one uses, and middle names included.. are they needed, why can't there be a born thing in the info box. Also should it be Zachary Timothy "Zak" Ramsey(nee Zak Barnes) ... (born Zak Barnes) ... (previously Zak Barnes) ... How do you include his old name in that? Raintheone ( talk) 23:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
hey mind ur own business!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianwazere ( talk • contribs) 23:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Lol thanks for warning that Brianwozere guy, didn't even notice until just that he had 'warned' me to watch my mouth, I guess I'd best watch myself :D && Thanks for the info on the Zak thing, I'll just leave it... I'm finding a lot more images if you haven't noticed and good work on the Gaz article. Ricky or Sheila maybe next? lol Raintheone ( talk) 17:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Good that your back online. My bad grammar was going unnoticed! Here has a little info on how he manages to portray his character, would do for the casting or personality section.... for gaz.. Raintheone ( talk) 03:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Lauren Branning. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. There is currently a discussion about this at
Talk: Lauren Branning, please join in the discussion there. Thank you for your co-operation in this matter.
5 albert square (
talk)
00:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
what was wrong with the edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.47.180 ( talk) 23:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Tan and Tumble no longer exsits its now Cincerity which has been shown in the past two episodes.
Littlebecky ( talk) 19:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I noticed youy put the nomination in. It's evident you put a lot of hard work into the article. More references..?? well.. I won't edit it as I might review it (if i figure it out lol). Plus I iknow that article is your baby so I'll let you do it all... I spent over an hour researching you these so please use some. :P :P (If you don't have enough time I suppose I'd try add them in, but I don't wabnt to change the tone of the article now it's nommed, it needs to read good and you're better with the gramar!! haha)
So for Reception you could include some parts. In Maxim mag (online too) Lister did a photoshoot and interview Here They asked questions like "In Hollyoaks you’re a bit of a tomboy. Are you in real life?" and "Your character is pretty popular with the boys but doesn’t often pull. How do you fare in real life?" also So with that you could put 'Maxim magazine states that the character is really popular with male viewers and dresses like a bit of a tomboy' ....
Zoe lister on lesbian scenes with Loui batley Here
Here is a good one, before the lesbian thing with Sarah Lister actually asked bosses to cook her a lesbian storyline up .. here and coverage of her wish being granted... here is the ref... now thats quite a find!! lol
Here is an interview with Sky TV about her exit, skydive storyline, what it was like to film. If you don't find any new info in it, it could be used as a secondary reference, the more the better aye. :)
Here is an interview with the liverpool echo discussing the sky dive, how it was filming the stint in prison (how they made the set, what she had to do during filming etc) ... if your interested in the actress there is a bit on here too.... will do for development...
Here is a great one for personality and identity - "I think she's been in and out of so many relationships and her life is at a bit of a juncture; she probably needs to sort her head out, sort her career, knuckle down really and not get bogged down into a relationship because everything takes a backseat when you're in one." --- thisisbristol link found here
Heat magazine interview about the trial here
Personality and identity can be drawn out from this cool interview Here, just like Loretta she is not a blonde stereotype... Zoë, do you have to fight against the blonde stereotype image? I haven’t faced any problems yet. Maybe when and if I leave the show, people might go: ‘Oh, you’re just another blonde from Hollyoaks,’ and I might have to prove my worth then, but I’m definitely not a dizzy blonde, and neither is my character anyway – she’s quite a tomboy and street-smart.
Now here's a bit of out of universe style inclusion... When Lydia stabbed Zoe in the weeks before there was a big secret around the 'will she or won't she die' .. but in this article from Myparkmag.. they actually let the cat out of the bag by revealing she would not die Here ... second link from STV here
video of lister on E4.
Lister states that her favourite storyline is the stalker Will storyline speaking with five.tv here ... she jokes about the storyline in 2008 here
Tony hirst says the conterversy of dating younger woman zoe has died down... here he also talks about fiklming scenes in the bedroom with her which could do for development
lister praises parachute jump episode here at STV.
have no audio on comp sometimes so dont know what they say in this. with digitalspy here
episode guide for the jess and zoe fued .. here
The article
Zoe Carpenter you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See
Talk:Zoe Carpenter for things which need to be addressed.
Frickative
06:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Are you making the changes to the article then Whoniverse??? Come on we need it to be the first good article. :P RAIN the ONE (Talk) 23:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Did you notice I did what was needed. It got Ga Status... You still working on the articles? RAIN the ONE (Talk) 18:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:JacquiMalota2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:49, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DominiqueJackson260.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse ( talk) 04:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:HollieJayBowes1096.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SairaChoudhry016.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk 04:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Are you back then? You still watch Hollyoaks? When I edit wiki since, I've kinda gone on a Neighbours and Hollyoaks spree.. made a few GA's aswell. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 20:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Also I'm here on a spoiler mission... I think there should be loads of refs for a whole bunch of characters soon when the new gay storyline kicks off... Basically we know Ste and Brendan are going to get it on... but Rae, Veronica and Eileen are heavily involved... It's great though that Rae is getting some good storylines at last, I'm also glad Veronica is carrying on in the show for a bit, I hope she gets promoted to regular... I was always sad Sheila Buxton was never kept on... so hopefully they listen to the fans this time. lol Who do you reckon will die in the fire?? RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 23:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
I think Cindy would be a good choice to try and get GA with. :) Oh, with Clare's image. Images we uploaded last year have been getting deleted because the fair use rationale was not strong enough.. so Loretta Jones, Mitzeee Minniver and Jasmine Costello are examples, their images hold the latest rationale that's more detailed.. only just though... also the name of the image used for clare is all over the place, they usually get called after the character, short and simple. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 17:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, so with the infoboxes for HO, we've changed them. They all have classification now, they follow the same trend as EE, Neighbours, Home and Away and Corrie. (You'll notice Corrie just adopted another colour..) I think everyone wanted consistancy or something. So if you see olders ones not brought up to date, can you change them? RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 23:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
The list of minor characters 2010 are subject to review, I have reviewing rights. It's the second time youer edit has popped into my pending reviews in a major way.. it's because you have removed Molly and Laura again... Why is that? RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 12:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself, as I've seen your work on Hollyoaks articles and its brilliant, I've been heavily editing all HO article for months now, and I'm really enjoying it! WOO! It's good to have you back on board! -- AcidBrights ( talk) 07:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
My little baby at the minute is Gabby Sharpe I created it and im nurturing it, I love it! :) It's great to have you back btw, oh and I was wondering if we should combine forces on a Hollyoaks Later series 3 article?-- AcidBrights ( talk) 16:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Heyy, thought I'd start a new discussion. I noticed someone Added Tom Hughes as upcoming. Can you keep an eye out for a ref for him. It was true, but their is no ref yet. I knew of Drew Dillon, Tom Hughes and Chris Overton all joining the cast as different characters... but only found one for Drew Dillon before the waveguide spoilers mentioned him. (Btw I think the latter are likley to appear in Later, also one of them is on the 2010 HO calender as february.....) RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 20:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Good work on Brendan and Mandy. Brendan's is ace, he'll create lotsa publicity for HO I think. Even if he is a greasey-weedy looking thing. I started work on Steph, it was a right mess, and Jessica Harris' article... RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 15:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh a name change. Good job I noticed the move log, would have gotten confused! (I didn't even know you could change names lol) RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 22:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Macca is related to Brendan because he is still married to Eileen. Makes him a nephew to Brendan. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 22:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Well he was that child's uncle yeah... through marriage.. i didn't even think of that one. We normally include adoptive and marriage links, when thought of. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 23:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh, something of interest and don't know if you had noticed Here is a talk of the infobox being merged... needs opinions... there is also one for Family Affairs... RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 23:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Hollyoaks character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
WOSlinker (
talk)
22:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. You said I need a source for my edit on Amy - well to be honest it needed to be edited because it hadn't been since March and it's now October! I thought I was doing it a favour. Well anyway which bit do you want a source for? I can get them easily for any of the bits. Plus, i'm new to this area and have just began using this IP address and when i look at the IP address messages theres loaddddssss of complaints and I just want to say that wasn't me because I've just moved here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.180 ( talk) 15:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Okay thank you, it was the other edits apart from the departure I was most worried about because I felt good for updating it since it hadn't been done in months. Okay I have now put up the departure section again with a reference and hopefully that will be ok. If it's not, then that's ok, no problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 16:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I started a new discussion on the minor character of hollyoaks 2010 talk page. Also I was wondering, can you get an image of Hollyoaks' new title card? On the E4 episode it has changed to black, red and silver. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 15:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Wtf? You made a mess of the Hollyoaks Locations page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 22:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Irrelevant? How, Mercedes and Carmel were not always a resident of that house, and that needs to be noted so people can know the full truth! You say not to add the dates like that - why? Look at Ste's, it shows he moved out during 2009 and you have no problem with that. Plus, was it you who added in a heap of previous employees? Who really wants a big list at the end, they just want current! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 22:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
It's not ridiculous, what about Ste then, whose dates were done not by me but yet still up? Carmel was a part of the Valentine household for a good part of a year, doesn't that deserve to be noted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 22:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
And I wouldn't say it's ridiculous, it's informative. People deserve to know the full facts. I'm a normal visitor to these pages like anyone else, and I felt mad how Ste's move out was noted but none of the Ms Queen's or Cheryl's were. it's unbalanced and I thought it needed to be fixed. 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 22:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
To be fair IP user, the whole page was a mess, it still is. It lacks any references apart from two. It would only interest a fan and has no encyclopedic value. I have wanted to rid of the lot, which we should really because it's all unsourced nonsense atm. I'd suggest that if you feel strong enough about.. go and transform the page, help us out a little. After all, right now there are only 4 editors really giving their all to improve.... so we need more help. AS for people needing to know the full facts, why would anyone other than a fan be interested? WP:FAN isn't always promoted on Wikipedia though... RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 17:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
List of characters from Hollyoaks, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~~
[ジャム][
t -
c
07:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary for your edits. Thank you. ~~
[ジャム][
t -
c
00:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (LostHavoc) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome! ~~
[ジャム][
t -
c
00:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. In the Hollyoaks template ({{ Hollyoaks}}), please avoid introducing characters that haven't been introduced into the show yet. For example, Cheryl, who doesn't arrive until May. Also, the list is ordered by surname, so for characters that don't have a surname, please just list them in the main list by order of their first name. See my edit for a better explanation of what I mean. ~~ [ジャム][ t - c 09:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I would like to know whether the beast was hurt by Jack's gunshot. Please reply on my talk page. -- Tyw7 ( Talk • Contributions) 00:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Whoniverse93. Would you mind weighing in on this discussion? Flyer22 ( talk) 01:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for preserving this material by moving it from an unneeded stand alone article to a list of characters. I encourage you to continue to do this type of merge in the future. However, you need to make sure to properly document all merges by doing the following:
These steps are necessary to properly comply with our content licensing terms. In particular be sure to wikilink the source article in the edit summary that completes the merge. Otherwise it isn't clear where the content came from.
I have gone ahead and fixed your edits relating to Grace Hutchinson, so you don't have to worry about it there. If you have any questions feel free to reply here or on my talk page. Thank you, ThaddeusB ( talk) 01:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
OMG; sorry!
LovesHollyoaksxoxo
I need to get on my soapbox. But why were you saying that Craig & John Paul were engaged but broke up but are now boyfriends? They were NEVER engaged! & sorry I just like to edit!
LovesHollyoaksxoxo
Thanks for uploading File:SamanthaRowley060.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ( ESkog)( Talk) 11:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SairaChoudhry016.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ( ESkog)( Talk) 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:GemmaBissix764.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ( ESkog)( Talk) 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Looks good. Feel free to remove the big red "no source" tags. ( ESkog)( Talk) 15:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
You can't be serious. The image you uploaded, it's not even Hannah. It's Emma Rigby. What was wrong with the image of Hannah Ashworth? That actually had the right image tags. All your images end up deleted anyway, so this was basically vandalism advertising a fansite called 'Hollyoaksbabes.net' so it cannot be a screenshot of a TV programme. Your other edits to the article were not helpful either. Raintheone ( talk) 00:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello after our recent resolved problem we had I thought I'd ask you your opinions on a few matters. All the hollyoaks character pages are just pointless storyline archives like I previously said, with you and me being two of a very small amount of members that make notable edits to these articles, do you think Hollyoaks should have it's own wikiproject? We can then gather the editors that do these massive storyline edits and help them make only edits that have reason to them. A massive clean up is in order as I'm sure you know, one of the problems is coming from the main page, which is crap basically. It needs a read like Eastenders tbh. Character articles one day will need to read like Pauline Fowler.. . Any ideas how we could do that, assuming your interested. =) Raintheone ( talk) 13:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:GemmaBissix764.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 21:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:HannahAshworth2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 21:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SamanthaRowley060.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 21:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
You've uploaded some images such as the one of Clare Devine which is tagged again. It really needs taking of, the tag that is. Oh and when your editing character development sections, original research such as in the article Tony Hutchinson is okay, because were viewers and we know that's how he acts and what he is like, but a new reader would not and with there being no references cited it could be challenged to be removed if it remains uncited/unverifiable. The character articles on a whole are generally looking better, plenty more condensing of the storylines is needed on many but we'll get thatc sorted. Oh and the project, hows that going? Raintheone ( talk) 20:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JakeDean.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 14:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing the Romances field from the John Paul McQueen and Craig Dean character infoboxes whenever IPs and maybe even registered editors add them back? Yes, Template: Infobox soap character does have a Romances field. Flyer22 ( talk) 22:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
I also do not mean to sound harsh, but the infobox you are designing ( Template:Infobox Hollyoaks character), with all those family fields, is a bad idea. Why create all those fields...but reject a Romances field? Flyer22 ( talk) 23:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
If Sarah has " come out" as a lesbian, she should be classified as one. I have not watched where she "comes out" yet, but I just looked at one of the older versions of this article, where the lead used to state this and where you reverted someone who placed her in the lesbian category. Her having been with men romantically/sexually does not necessarily mean that she is " bisexual" (as the Bisexuality article notes) and that she is not a lesbian or should not be classified as a lesbian.
I will mainly leave the Hollyoaks articles to you, because I do not currently have the time to clean a lot of them up and am not as familiar with the history of this show as you are. But when I see something within any of them that needs correcting, I will seek to have whatever it is corrected. Flyer22 ( talk) 23:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For you tireless work on Hollyoaks character related articles. You have improved so much and are making great edits to them. Raintheone ( talk) 22:24, 21 September 2009 (UTC) |
I did not expect one back. We have both been working hard on the articles, but you more so. As you know I tend to work on Coronation Street articles the most. But Hollyoaks are a big plan for my editing in the future. Just latley though you have made amazing edits to them. You made good edits ad mostly in re-creating Leila, Ravi and Anita's article pages. They are a agood read and hold notability. The images are great now too! I don't know where you are finding these good quality images from. =) Raintheone ( talk) 23:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
So I'm going to make the three new students articles when there is enough stuff about. Suprisingly there is though. I've made Charlotte Lau, just thought I'd mention it. You have hger on your userpage as a redirect. Dave will be easy because his character was a focal point of a government funded spin off to raise the awareness of binge drinking. With India there must be plenty of stuff because of the open audtioning they held. I'll do Hayley to if you like. I noticed you are going to rewrite Nancy Hayton though, what's wrong with that? Raintheone ( talk) 16:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Why did you revert the Dr Who page and tag as vandalism the edits made by User:Ccacsmss. It looked good faith to me, but... I am learning which I why I am curious as to the vandalism tag. thanks -- Alchemist Jack ( talk) 01:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Oh god I'm crap at spoting mistakes. I can write the article, but damn I can't always use grammar! Glad you watch what I'm doing. Lol... I was just about to do more of the students but Hollyoaks have deleted Load and Go which had a tonne of information on Dave and India! So I just thought, lets do Loretta. Oh and Hayley's article will be completed by tonight also. Raintheone ( talk) 22:15, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I like Dave and India's pages! Were totally ploughing through these now. Some hard jobs ahead with condensing storylines down for the likes of Jacqui McQueen, Darren Osbourne and the like. Are we the only doing this within the project btw? Raintheone ( talk) 00:12, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I've just been editing more info in on Zak's page.... Zachary Timothy "Zak" Ramsey <--- how annoying are full names no one uses, and middle names included.. are they needed, why can't there be a born thing in the info box. Also should it be Zachary Timothy "Zak" Ramsey(nee Zak Barnes) ... (born Zak Barnes) ... (previously Zak Barnes) ... How do you include his old name in that? Raintheone ( talk) 23:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
hey mind ur own business!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianwazere ( talk • contribs) 23:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Lol thanks for warning that Brianwozere guy, didn't even notice until just that he had 'warned' me to watch my mouth, I guess I'd best watch myself :D && Thanks for the info on the Zak thing, I'll just leave it... I'm finding a lot more images if you haven't noticed and good work on the Gaz article. Ricky or Sheila maybe next? lol Raintheone ( talk) 17:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Good that your back online. My bad grammar was going unnoticed! Here has a little info on how he manages to portray his character, would do for the casting or personality section.... for gaz.. Raintheone ( talk) 03:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Lauren Branning. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. There is currently a discussion about this at
Talk: Lauren Branning, please join in the discussion there. Thank you for your co-operation in this matter.
5 albert square (
talk)
00:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
what was wrong with the edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.47.180 ( talk) 23:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Tan and Tumble no longer exsits its now Cincerity which has been shown in the past two episodes.
Littlebecky ( talk) 19:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I noticed youy put the nomination in. It's evident you put a lot of hard work into the article. More references..?? well.. I won't edit it as I might review it (if i figure it out lol). Plus I iknow that article is your baby so I'll let you do it all... I spent over an hour researching you these so please use some. :P :P (If you don't have enough time I suppose I'd try add them in, but I don't wabnt to change the tone of the article now it's nommed, it needs to read good and you're better with the gramar!! haha)
So for Reception you could include some parts. In Maxim mag (online too) Lister did a photoshoot and interview Here They asked questions like "In Hollyoaks you’re a bit of a tomboy. Are you in real life?" and "Your character is pretty popular with the boys but doesn’t often pull. How do you fare in real life?" also So with that you could put 'Maxim magazine states that the character is really popular with male viewers and dresses like a bit of a tomboy' ....
Zoe lister on lesbian scenes with Loui batley Here
Here is a good one, before the lesbian thing with Sarah Lister actually asked bosses to cook her a lesbian storyline up .. here and coverage of her wish being granted... here is the ref... now thats quite a find!! lol
Here is an interview with Sky TV about her exit, skydive storyline, what it was like to film. If you don't find any new info in it, it could be used as a secondary reference, the more the better aye. :)
Here is an interview with the liverpool echo discussing the sky dive, how it was filming the stint in prison (how they made the set, what she had to do during filming etc) ... if your interested in the actress there is a bit on here too.... will do for development...
Here is a great one for personality and identity - "I think she's been in and out of so many relationships and her life is at a bit of a juncture; she probably needs to sort her head out, sort her career, knuckle down really and not get bogged down into a relationship because everything takes a backseat when you're in one." --- thisisbristol link found here
Heat magazine interview about the trial here
Personality and identity can be drawn out from this cool interview Here, just like Loretta she is not a blonde stereotype... Zoë, do you have to fight against the blonde stereotype image? I haven’t faced any problems yet. Maybe when and if I leave the show, people might go: ‘Oh, you’re just another blonde from Hollyoaks,’ and I might have to prove my worth then, but I’m definitely not a dizzy blonde, and neither is my character anyway – she’s quite a tomboy and street-smart.
Now here's a bit of out of universe style inclusion... When Lydia stabbed Zoe in the weeks before there was a big secret around the 'will she or won't she die' .. but in this article from Myparkmag.. they actually let the cat out of the bag by revealing she would not die Here ... second link from STV here
video of lister on E4.
Lister states that her favourite storyline is the stalker Will storyline speaking with five.tv here ... she jokes about the storyline in 2008 here
Tony hirst says the conterversy of dating younger woman zoe has died down... here he also talks about fiklming scenes in the bedroom with her which could do for development
lister praises parachute jump episode here at STV.
have no audio on comp sometimes so dont know what they say in this. with digitalspy here
episode guide for the jess and zoe fued .. here
The article
Zoe Carpenter you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See
Talk:Zoe Carpenter for things which need to be addressed.
Frickative
06:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Are you making the changes to the article then Whoniverse??? Come on we need it to be the first good article. :P RAIN the ONE (Talk) 23:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Did you notice I did what was needed. It got Ga Status... You still working on the articles? RAIN the ONE (Talk) 18:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:JacquiMalota2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:49, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DominiqueJackson260.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse ( talk) 04:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:HollieJayBowes1096.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SairaChoudhry016.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk 04:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Are you back then? You still watch Hollyoaks? When I edit wiki since, I've kinda gone on a Neighbours and Hollyoaks spree.. made a few GA's aswell. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 20:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Also I'm here on a spoiler mission... I think there should be loads of refs for a whole bunch of characters soon when the new gay storyline kicks off... Basically we know Ste and Brendan are going to get it on... but Rae, Veronica and Eileen are heavily involved... It's great though that Rae is getting some good storylines at last, I'm also glad Veronica is carrying on in the show for a bit, I hope she gets promoted to regular... I was always sad Sheila Buxton was never kept on... so hopefully they listen to the fans this time. lol Who do you reckon will die in the fire?? RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 23:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
I think Cindy would be a good choice to try and get GA with. :) Oh, with Clare's image. Images we uploaded last year have been getting deleted because the fair use rationale was not strong enough.. so Loretta Jones, Mitzeee Minniver and Jasmine Costello are examples, their images hold the latest rationale that's more detailed.. only just though... also the name of the image used for clare is all over the place, they usually get called after the character, short and simple. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 17:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, so with the infoboxes for HO, we've changed them. They all have classification now, they follow the same trend as EE, Neighbours, Home and Away and Corrie. (You'll notice Corrie just adopted another colour..) I think everyone wanted consistancy or something. So if you see olders ones not brought up to date, can you change them? RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 23:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
The list of minor characters 2010 are subject to review, I have reviewing rights. It's the second time youer edit has popped into my pending reviews in a major way.. it's because you have removed Molly and Laura again... Why is that? RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 12:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself, as I've seen your work on Hollyoaks articles and its brilliant, I've been heavily editing all HO article for months now, and I'm really enjoying it! WOO! It's good to have you back on board! -- AcidBrights ( talk) 07:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
My little baby at the minute is Gabby Sharpe I created it and im nurturing it, I love it! :) It's great to have you back btw, oh and I was wondering if we should combine forces on a Hollyoaks Later series 3 article?-- AcidBrights ( talk) 16:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Heyy, thought I'd start a new discussion. I noticed someone Added Tom Hughes as upcoming. Can you keep an eye out for a ref for him. It was true, but their is no ref yet. I knew of Drew Dillon, Tom Hughes and Chris Overton all joining the cast as different characters... but only found one for Drew Dillon before the waveguide spoilers mentioned him. (Btw I think the latter are likley to appear in Later, also one of them is on the 2010 HO calender as february.....) RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 20:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Good work on Brendan and Mandy. Brendan's is ace, he'll create lotsa publicity for HO I think. Even if he is a greasey-weedy looking thing. I started work on Steph, it was a right mess, and Jessica Harris' article... RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 15:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh a name change. Good job I noticed the move log, would have gotten confused! (I didn't even know you could change names lol) RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 22:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Macca is related to Brendan because he is still married to Eileen. Makes him a nephew to Brendan. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 22:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Well he was that child's uncle yeah... through marriage.. i didn't even think of that one. We normally include adoptive and marriage links, when thought of. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 23:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh, something of interest and don't know if you had noticed Here is a talk of the infobox being merged... needs opinions... there is also one for Family Affairs... RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 23:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Hollyoaks character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
WOSlinker (
talk)
22:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. You said I need a source for my edit on Amy - well to be honest it needed to be edited because it hadn't been since March and it's now October! I thought I was doing it a favour. Well anyway which bit do you want a source for? I can get them easily for any of the bits. Plus, i'm new to this area and have just began using this IP address and when i look at the IP address messages theres loaddddssss of complaints and I just want to say that wasn't me because I've just moved here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.180 ( talk) 15:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Okay thank you, it was the other edits apart from the departure I was most worried about because I felt good for updating it since it hadn't been done in months. Okay I have now put up the departure section again with a reference and hopefully that will be ok. If it's not, then that's ok, no problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 16:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I started a new discussion on the minor character of hollyoaks 2010 talk page. Also I was wondering, can you get an image of Hollyoaks' new title card? On the E4 episode it has changed to black, red and silver. RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 15:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Wtf? You made a mess of the Hollyoaks Locations page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 22:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Irrelevant? How, Mercedes and Carmel were not always a resident of that house, and that needs to be noted so people can know the full truth! You say not to add the dates like that - why? Look at Ste's, it shows he moved out during 2009 and you have no problem with that. Plus, was it you who added in a heap of previous employees? Who really wants a big list at the end, they just want current! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 22:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
It's not ridiculous, what about Ste then, whose dates were done not by me but yet still up? Carmel was a part of the Valentine household for a good part of a year, doesn't that deserve to be noted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 22:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
And I wouldn't say it's ridiculous, it's informative. People deserve to know the full facts. I'm a normal visitor to these pages like anyone else, and I felt mad how Ste's move out was noted but none of the Ms Queen's or Cheryl's were. it's unbalanced and I thought it needed to be fixed. 149.157.1.154 ( talk) 22:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
To be fair IP user, the whole page was a mess, it still is. It lacks any references apart from two. It would only interest a fan and has no encyclopedic value. I have wanted to rid of the lot, which we should really because it's all unsourced nonsense atm. I'd suggest that if you feel strong enough about.. go and transform the page, help us out a little. After all, right now there are only 4 editors really giving their all to improve.... so we need more help. AS for people needing to know the full facts, why would anyone other than a fan be interested? WP:FAN isn't always promoted on Wikipedia though... RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 17:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)