Hello, Lorsrumäne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD ( talk) 15:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pope Boniface VIII, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Peaceray ( talk) 21:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pope Alexander VI, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Peaceray ( talk) 21:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pope John XII. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Peaceray ( talk) 21:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pope John XXIII. Peaceray ( talk) 21:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pope Paul II. Peaceray ( talk) 21:54, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pope John XXII. Peaceray ( talk) 22:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry Benedict Stuart. "Caution should nevertheless be given against assuming any active sexual relationships, even if they may have had a romantic element, because equally clear in contemporary sources is York's horror of all impropriety." Peaceray ( talk) 22:38, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Ronhjones   ^(Talk) 22:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ronhjones   ^(Talk) 22:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT Roman Catholic bishops requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC) reply