This page is a file, if you want to nominate it for deletion you should use Wikipedia:Files for deletion, not Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Hut 8.5 22:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
I note that you deleted a large part of Metaphysics without first seeking the views of other editors first. — Philogos ( talk) 01:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Three editors including myself have criticised your deletion, and none have supported it.— Philogos ( talk) 02:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
A fourth editor has now reverted your deletion. If you have sought the opinion of other editors before you made you deletion-edit you would have discovered that it had no support. There is a difference between being bold and being rash. I suggest that in the futurure you seek the views of other editors before you make such edits. Would that be a problem for you?— Philogos ( talk) 02:29, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
This page is a file, if you want to nominate it for deletion you should use Wikipedia:Files for deletion, not Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Hut 8.5 22:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
I note that you deleted a large part of Metaphysics without first seeking the views of other editors first. — Philogos ( talk) 01:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Three editors including myself have criticised your deletion, and none have supported it.— Philogos ( talk) 02:17, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
A fourth editor has now reverted your deletion. If you have sought the opinion of other editors before you made you deletion-edit you would have discovered that it had no support. There is a difference between being bold and being rash. I suggest that in the futurure you seek the views of other editors before you make such edits. Would that be a problem for you?— Philogos ( talk) 02:29, 18 June 2011 (UTC)