![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, what you could do while waiting for me to look over the article (if you haven't done this already) is check out US court case articles recently promoted to FA (and their FAC noms while you're at it) -- I'm sure there have been some this year, e.g. Smith Act trials of Communist Party leaders. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 02:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Welcome to the fifth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!
As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah ( talk) 08:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for the review and sorry for the delay. Ive finally gotten around to it. Savidan 17:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
SarahStierch ( talk) 23:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I thought you would be interested in this photo event, too: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Atlanta (tentatively for September 15).-- Pharos ( talk) 00:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Azad Kashmir. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 10:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Lord Roem,
Any update on the dispute. Again, I've added tons of references, why am I being neglected? Isn't WP about the correct content? Please, help bring this forward or advise on next steps. Ximhua ( talk) 01:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
No rush :) Hope you are enjoying your wikibreak! SarahStierch ( talk) 06:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Tea Party politicians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 10:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Roem! Thanks for being a host at the Teahouse! We're working on the Host lounge renovations and we've created a new way for hosts to become hosts. Please take a few minutes and test it out here, by creating your new host profile. It's also a good excuse to update your image, quote, and information about yourself :) You can join in on the host discussion about the new feature here. See you at the Teahouse! SarahStierch ( talk) 20:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey there Lord Roem, I noticed that you haven't been very active at the dispute resolution noticeboard lately where you listed yourself as a volunteer - I was hoping if you had some spare time if you could take a look there and offer some assistance. Thanks again for your help :-) Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 11:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 19:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Welcome to the sixth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!
As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. EdwardsBot ( talk) 00:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Because of your interest in dispute resolution,, I am inviting you to comment on the following RfC:
Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem?
This dispute has been going on for over ten years and there have been over 1,300,000 words posted on the article talk page (by comparison, all of the Harry Potter books together total 1,084,170 words). Over the years the dispute has been through multiple noticeboards, mediators, and even the Arbitration Committee without resolving the conflict, so a lot of wisdom is needed here. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 00:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Lord Roem, please check the recent history of this article and the attendant AfD. You approved this for DYK ( this version or thereabouts, I suppose) so you may have an opinion on it. I found nothing in the article or its history that independently verified the claims to fame, and I note that most of he work referred to in the article (and cited in the hook) wasn't even done by herself alone. In short, the article struck me as vanispam, a pretty clear example of it, and after pruning and searching I saw no option but AfD. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 03:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Traditional Values Coalition. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 11:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.
If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.-- Dom497 ( talk) 15:19, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States Senate election in Massachusetts, 2012. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 11:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by
ENewsBot (
info) ·
05:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 12:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Not sure how I screwed that up twice in a row-- Tznkai ( talk) 04:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Lord Roem, I'd like to take the opportunity to remind you (or perhaps make you aware of?) Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Clerks/Procedures#Managing_and_closing_cases point #16. In particular, "If the decision includes the use of restrictions on the editing of an individual editor, list the details at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions". You recently closed the clarification request on civility enforcement, but did not post the restriction to Wikipedia:Editing restrictions. Thank you for your attention, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm notifying you as I noticed your impressive work on the GA Quality article, Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:
Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt ( talk) 22:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slaughter and May. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 12:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, what you could do while waiting for me to look over the article (if you haven't done this already) is check out US court case articles recently promoted to FA (and their FAC noms while you're at it) -- I'm sure there have been some this year, e.g. Smith Act trials of Communist Party leaders. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 02:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Welcome to the fifth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!
As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah ( talk) 08:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for the review and sorry for the delay. Ive finally gotten around to it. Savidan 17:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
SarahStierch ( talk) 23:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I thought you would be interested in this photo event, too: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Atlanta (tentatively for September 15).-- Pharos ( talk) 00:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Azad Kashmir. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 10:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Lord Roem,
Any update on the dispute. Again, I've added tons of references, why am I being neglected? Isn't WP about the correct content? Please, help bring this forward or advise on next steps. Ximhua ( talk) 01:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
No rush :) Hope you are enjoying your wikibreak! SarahStierch ( talk) 06:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Tea Party politicians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 10:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Roem! Thanks for being a host at the Teahouse! We're working on the Host lounge renovations and we've created a new way for hosts to become hosts. Please take a few minutes and test it out here, by creating your new host profile. It's also a good excuse to update your image, quote, and information about yourself :) You can join in on the host discussion about the new feature here. See you at the Teahouse! SarahStierch ( talk) 20:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey there Lord Roem, I noticed that you haven't been very active at the dispute resolution noticeboard lately where you listed yourself as a volunteer - I was hoping if you had some spare time if you could take a look there and offer some assistance. Thanks again for your help :-) Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 11:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 19:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Welcome to the sixth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!
As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. EdwardsBot ( talk) 00:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Because of your interest in dispute resolution,, I am inviting you to comment on the following RfC:
Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem?
This dispute has been going on for over ten years and there have been over 1,300,000 words posted on the article talk page (by comparison, all of the Harry Potter books together total 1,084,170 words). Over the years the dispute has been through multiple noticeboards, mediators, and even the Arbitration Committee without resolving the conflict, so a lot of wisdom is needed here. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 00:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Lord Roem, please check the recent history of this article and the attendant AfD. You approved this for DYK ( this version or thereabouts, I suppose) so you may have an opinion on it. I found nothing in the article or its history that independently verified the claims to fame, and I note that most of he work referred to in the article (and cited in the hook) wasn't even done by herself alone. In short, the article struck me as vanispam, a pretty clear example of it, and after pruning and searching I saw no option but AfD. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 03:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Traditional Values Coalition. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 11:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.
If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.-- Dom497 ( talk) 15:19, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States Senate election in Massachusetts, 2012. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 11:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by
ENewsBot (
info) ·
05:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 12:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Not sure how I screwed that up twice in a row-- Tznkai ( talk) 04:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Lord Roem, I'd like to take the opportunity to remind you (or perhaps make you aware of?) Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Clerks/Procedures#Managing_and_closing_cases point #16. In particular, "If the decision includes the use of restrictions on the editing of an individual editor, list the details at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions". You recently closed the clarification request on civility enforcement, but did not post the restriction to Wikipedia:Editing restrictions. Thank you for your attention, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm notifying you as I noticed your impressive work on the GA Quality article, Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:
Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt ( talk) 22:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slaughter and May. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 12:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)