This is Loafiewa's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Stop. Don't edit "List of Assault Rifle" article again, your edits are already quite damaging and the potential to cause misinformation. We believe that the article is filled in according to the existing facts, talking about the validity of the sources listed whether they are independent or not, of course the sources listed are valid. If you still have doubts about this, we can advise you to read more of the existing sources, both in the article and those that have not been included in it. I think you have understood this appeal. 36.80.171.174 ( talk) 23:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Title KindSpinel ( talk) 15:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
You seemingly removed by edit as Russia as operator of the article on M2 Bradley. I am not able to understand if you are pro Ukrainian. First I added Russia as non operator, then you edited it citing the reason that it is irrelevant. Then when I put Russia as operator you gave the reason that a capture does not make it operator. I saw Ukraine as operator of many Russian vehicles then why do you not remove Ukraine as operator of Russian vehicles(For eg T90,btr 80,ak 74 and even grenades).The article name is List of equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is no reason that operators mean equipment put in service. In this article you will see Ukraine as operator of many Russian vehicles even if they did not put the vehicle in services. I request you to kindly look in matter. Taking side of one side is not beneficial for Wikipedian readers. Wikipedia should be neutral in this aspect Hope you get what I meant to say Thanks SOHAMGHOSH123456 ( talk) 03:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
you reverted my edits and other people's edits of the list of sniper rifles page for no Reason, you have said my edit was "non notable" this page is about the list of sniper rifles, not notable sniper rifles! so any sniper rifle should be on this list with no exeptions! Anonymous dude420 ( talk) 18:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Wondering why this was reverted... what is wrong with using the flag template?
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Ross_rifle&diff=prev&oldid=1220224812
I truly am wondering about this.
Old💩404 (talk) 20:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
hi. you undid my edits on the battle of Wuhan page on the basis of me editorializing my content, but i don't understand why you had to revert all my edits because of a few choice words i used. some of the content i put in there was super important, like the Jiujiang Massacre which is an established fact in outside sources like Mackinnon and Mitters works, but has no references on the battle of Wuhan page.
can you explain why you removed these edits? for something as major as a "mini-Nanjing Massacre," this content shouldn't be removed over a few words I used. I also see that you're a fan of the japanese military, and I don't want to make assumptions, but I want to know where you stand on this. thanks. Wahreit ( talk) 19:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Need your help for editing numbers of weapons/equipments used by Chinese 'peoples liberation Army ground force & airforce, if you have access to sources like military balance 2023 or 2024 than kindly update those pages, the pages are filled with random numbers without any citation. Dl ff ( talk) 05:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
i added a sub category for the Al-Ghoul rifle as its a variant of the styer anti material rifle i listed sources and proved what i listed was correct so why did you revert it? is talking about said rifle not allowed on wikipedia or should i have made a seperate article for it? though that would be greatly unnecessary Waterlover3 ( talk) 12:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
This is Loafiewa's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Stop. Don't edit "List of Assault Rifle" article again, your edits are already quite damaging and the potential to cause misinformation. We believe that the article is filled in according to the existing facts, talking about the validity of the sources listed whether they are independent or not, of course the sources listed are valid. If you still have doubts about this, we can advise you to read more of the existing sources, both in the article and those that have not been included in it. I think you have understood this appeal. 36.80.171.174 ( talk) 23:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Title KindSpinel ( talk) 15:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
You seemingly removed by edit as Russia as operator of the article on M2 Bradley. I am not able to understand if you are pro Ukrainian. First I added Russia as non operator, then you edited it citing the reason that it is irrelevant. Then when I put Russia as operator you gave the reason that a capture does not make it operator. I saw Ukraine as operator of many Russian vehicles then why do you not remove Ukraine as operator of Russian vehicles(For eg T90,btr 80,ak 74 and even grenades).The article name is List of equipment of Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is no reason that operators mean equipment put in service. In this article you will see Ukraine as operator of many Russian vehicles even if they did not put the vehicle in services. I request you to kindly look in matter. Taking side of one side is not beneficial for Wikipedian readers. Wikipedia should be neutral in this aspect Hope you get what I meant to say Thanks SOHAMGHOSH123456 ( talk) 03:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
you reverted my edits and other people's edits of the list of sniper rifles page for no Reason, you have said my edit was "non notable" this page is about the list of sniper rifles, not notable sniper rifles! so any sniper rifle should be on this list with no exeptions! Anonymous dude420 ( talk) 18:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Wondering why this was reverted... what is wrong with using the flag template?
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Ross_rifle&diff=prev&oldid=1220224812
I truly am wondering about this.
Old💩404 (talk) 20:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
hi. you undid my edits on the battle of Wuhan page on the basis of me editorializing my content, but i don't understand why you had to revert all my edits because of a few choice words i used. some of the content i put in there was super important, like the Jiujiang Massacre which is an established fact in outside sources like Mackinnon and Mitters works, but has no references on the battle of Wuhan page.
can you explain why you removed these edits? for something as major as a "mini-Nanjing Massacre," this content shouldn't be removed over a few words I used. I also see that you're a fan of the japanese military, and I don't want to make assumptions, but I want to know where you stand on this. thanks. Wahreit ( talk) 19:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Need your help for editing numbers of weapons/equipments used by Chinese 'peoples liberation Army ground force & airforce, if you have access to sources like military balance 2023 or 2024 than kindly update those pages, the pages are filled with random numbers without any citation. Dl ff ( talk) 05:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
i added a sub category for the Al-Ghoul rifle as its a variant of the styer anti material rifle i listed sources and proved what i listed was correct so why did you revert it? is talking about said rifle not allowed on wikipedia or should i have made a seperate article for it? though that would be greatly unnecessary Waterlover3 ( talk) 12:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)