Thanks for your comments in this discussion. I don't respond in kind to Chronographos' ad hominem remarks not because I don't find them insulting, and not because I don't find them nasty, but because I trust that anyone else reading them will recognize that they reflect badly on him. I also acknowledge that my knowledge (of Greek and for that matter of everything else) is not perfect, and I am open to correction and discussion. You will note that Chronographos and Theathenae have said very little of substance. I will return to the discussion in a day or so, hoping that it has cooled off a bit. And I will stay focussed on substantive issues. -- Macrakis 22:27, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
An anecdote (se non e' vero, e' ben trovato): someone once told Federico Fellini "Maestro, with all due respect I think that film directors whose names end in -ini are the worst!" and he replied "Oh, do you mean Viscontini?" :-)) Chronographos 15:28, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Hi - I noticed that a while ago on the Spoken Wikipedia talk page you mentioned that "The MP3 format has already been turned down on Wikipedia." Since it is being discussed again here, I'm hoping that you can point out where the decision regarding the general use of MP3 on Wikipedia is. Thanks! - SCEhard T 23:26, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for correcting my edit to AmigaOS. Your edit summary said "There is much debate wrt exec.library being a microkernel". I wasn't aware of that. Are there any good URLs for this debate? Thanks in advance, CWC (talk) 03:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
The Jargon File at the bottom of the page documents them in full. - Saaber 17:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
My dear editor friends, we have a dispute to resolve.
It seems that we three only had taken care of this argument AVM. Other people prefer not commenting it.
This page has stated during Voting for Deletion it has not to be deleted but to be merged into 68k article.
It has been removed the Request for Undeletion, because infactAVM article it has been not decided for deletion.
But merging with 68K is a mistake and sure I can't merge the article into 68k. Else I will commit a false, and I don't want to.
Amiga Anywhere and ABOX have nothing in common with 68k code.
Just Amithlon while booting it starts an environment in which 68K code runs natively and ABOX has both built-in 68K code interpreter as long with PPC Amiga WarpUP interpreter (WarpUP is PPC Amiga executable fileformat for the Amiga classic subsystem running on CPU expansion card qith PPC 601 and 603e processor).
It seems to me that: Ljl he said that it could be started Amiga Anywhere article. He said there is no virtual machine that it could be considered Amiga Machine he also said I created a neologism.
I don't understood Mdwh position if he want article deleted at all, or just condsidered AVM as not correct at all and the arguments have to be dropped.
To both of you editors I remember that AVM is NOT a neologism. It is commonly used amongst amigans, but evidenceds I had bringing seems not convince you both.
But sure AVM is no a neologism. It is just a CATEGORY name which groups in a summary some brief informations about various objects with common characteristics.
The three existing Amiga VM (note that I just drop the fourth, Petunia, because has different characteristics which brings it into some sort of emulator like multi-purpose program) it is far more pratical that all three these arguments should have a common article which LISTS all the three virtual environments here in ONE article with AVM name.
It is just necessary because of reasons of logical order and search purposes by users of Wikipedia.
It could be that users searching for any kind of virtual machines want to access that data.
So there they can find just a summary of the three amiga VM. Else ifthey want refine their search only if they want to, by clicking on a single Virtual environment link and seek for its complete article.
(Example: it is just as Music ->Folk Music or Classical or Rock Music, then searching for Rock Music->Hard Rock.
At this point the user could refine the search in Hard Rock or decide other choices.
With AVM article existing the user could make these choices: Computer->Amiga->AVM->Amiga Anywhere or Computer->Virtual Machine->Amiga Virtual Machine, etc.)
This is my point of view. I will send a copy of it to both of you to define this dispute.
If we could find an agreement as Wikipedia advices as a first step of dispute resolving, then it will be fine to me.
If not, then sure we three had had follow all the steps for a friendly resolution and in the end I could start a Request for Comment, as long it has been decided this article could not be undeleted, just because the fact it has never been deleted.
Sincerely,--Raffaele Megabyte 01:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, could you help me with the "rolling R"? I cannot speak it.-- Julius-r 17:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
I read that you are from Milan. So you should know, then, that the Italian ISTAT has informed that the Italian population has reached the 60 million mark last month. That is why I have erased the "about". And to tell the truth I should have written "about 62 million" because there are in Italy nearly 2 million illegal immigrants to add to that number. But we are dealing with "mother tongue" and I am going to accept your opinion. Ciao. -- Paul0559 ( talk) 03:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
it actually had an important point to make, although the presentation was far from clear: milanese-italian (i.e. the variety of italian spoken in Milan) is one of the most influential dialects (of italian) at the sociolinguistic level (because of the prominent economic position that Milan enjoys). This must not be confused with Milanese, which is a variety of Western Lombard, NOT of Italian, and which is an L language in teh diglossic scenario. -- Dakrismeno ( talk) 16:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Please keep in mind that I was replying to User:RicoCorinth, NOT to User:Redthoreau, and for that reason I used single indentation (":"). I believe that is proper use of indentation, and since it is the second time already that User:Redthoreau changes my indentation (and in the former case, moves my paragraph) making it appear as if they were the ones I was replying to, I thought I would point this out. LjL ( talk) 22:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Here's when to put a disambig note on top: Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Usage_guidelines. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 15:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Re this edit [1] to Internet Relay Chat, as of revision 258665623 where {{ morefootnotes}} was added [2] the references were quite poor. I had been considering removing the template you just removed but didn't think it was quite ready (although it was getting borderline). Overall the article still as a long way to go though. -- Tothwolf ( talk) 18:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome! Happy Editing :) TubularWorld ( talk) 21:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I thought it was under the next cite, but I could be wrong, feel free to add them back if it isn't in it though, I could be wrong. -- Conor Fallon ( talk) 00:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
You made a good call here. Keep up your good work.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 23:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
If you have a handle on the CPU articles, I'll leave them to you. I was mainly trying to add a few refs and the databooks (when they can still be found) since the other editor was taking such issue with them. The Websters quotation books [3] [4] make heavy use Wikipedia content and note it with [WP]. -- Tothwolf ( talk) 22:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
In the game and in real life, planes (and also cars) reduce speed to avoid hitting another plane (or car) in front of them. Simple? OhanaUnited Talk page 01:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I was pleasantly surprised at your withdrawal of the nomination. I've done all I can with the sources available to me - it has now got three citations and some more detail. Fences& Windows 21:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. Someone has mentioned your name as in a dispute at this page and I have volunteered to mediate the case as part of the Mediation Cabal. Please read the "mediator notes" section of the case page for further instructions. Thank you, GrooveDog ( talk) ( Review) 02:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
It seems you've taken an interest in my research on the bias in the Pandeism article. I hope you favor a fair and correct telling of the history of things like this. Since by the grace of good fortune you also speak Italian, perhaps you would be so noble as to confirm the correctness of my received translation? The entire passage may readily be viewed on google books, which is here, http://books.google.com/books?id=viE7AAAAcAAJ&pg=RA1-PA16&dq=pandeismo Theoph876 ( talk) 22:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! Theoph876 ( talk) 19:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
http://landley.net/history/mirror/intel/faggin.html
Re [7] because ISBN-13s are not fully supported and often fail when attempting to do lookups via the Special:Booksources links. I'm not sure who added the Please use the 13-digit one if available bit to WP:ISBN but that is wrong. ISBN-10s are industry standard and are trivial to convert to ISBN-13 but as of today ISBN-13 is just not widely supported by 3rd parties. Btw, you also undid my other edits. -- Tothwolf ( talk) 02:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments states, "If a user removes a comment from their own talk page it should not be restored." -- You just did that. Please stop. -- Rico 20:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
I've taken our disputes to ANI. -- Rico 21:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Just thinking we should provide a verbal description of what the numbers indicate as per WP:ALT and for further clarification. Are were these areas determined by were the person looked or having them point?-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 17:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Rorschach test has been filed with the Mediation Committee (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rorschach test and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not.
Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy; further information on Wikipedia's policy on resolving disagreements is at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes.
If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an active mediator of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list ( click here for details).
Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission.
I already warned the user, twice, technically. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Seem the NYTs has misspoke about who added the common discriptions of the inkblot. Have emailed the gentlemen who wrote it as if I remember right it was you. Anyway good work. Cheers.-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 14:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
You seem to be inadvertently adding random characters to the top business, i.e. [9] [10] [11] [12] . Not sure if these are browser errors (?) or just typos. You might consider using "section edit" which will focus on the particular section you are commenting on and hopefully avoid errant letters. cheers, – xeno talk 15:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey LJL you are mentioned here: http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=answers-to-the-rorschach-test-revea-09-08-02 I think the Becks depression index is here I do not know about the MPPI :-) -- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 01:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rorschach test images. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 16:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I support your effort to better improve the organization and access to these images. They may all have to be looked into place like those on the Rorschach page however. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 19:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
For your ongoing promotion of freedom of information and the virtues of Wikipedia in spite of strong opposition. Keep up the good work. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 23:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC) |
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 07:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
i did not put destitution i put deposition which is obviously better than destitution since that word means another thing, but deposition means exactly what i refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Manuel_Zelaya#it_was_not_a_Coup_d.27_Etat Vercetticarl ( talk) 23:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
what 80.223.214.74 says totally makes sense, please answer me why wikipedia does recognize coup leader Andry Rajoelina to be the faithfully president of Madagascar, and Micheletti is not consider president? what's the difference? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Honduras#Honduras_President Vercetticarl ( talk) 00:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
¿Porqué pusiste esa plantilla innecesariamente?. Ese artículo no tiene ninguna citation needed (cita requerida). Tampoco se puede exigir referencias para todo. un saludo...-- El estremeñu ( talk) 20:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I am sorry. Sometimes I am thoom. -- El estremeñu ( talk) 22:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Please, correct the errors in the article
La posada de los muertos. --
El estremeñu (
talk) 23:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments in this discussion. I don't respond in kind to Chronographos' ad hominem remarks not because I don't find them insulting, and not because I don't find them nasty, but because I trust that anyone else reading them will recognize that they reflect badly on him. I also acknowledge that my knowledge (of Greek and for that matter of everything else) is not perfect, and I am open to correction and discussion. You will note that Chronographos and Theathenae have said very little of substance. I will return to the discussion in a day or so, hoping that it has cooled off a bit. And I will stay focussed on substantive issues. -- Macrakis 22:27, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
An anecdote (se non e' vero, e' ben trovato): someone once told Federico Fellini "Maestro, with all due respect I think that film directors whose names end in -ini are the worst!" and he replied "Oh, do you mean Viscontini?" :-)) Chronographos 15:28, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Hi - I noticed that a while ago on the Spoken Wikipedia talk page you mentioned that "The MP3 format has already been turned down on Wikipedia." Since it is being discussed again here, I'm hoping that you can point out where the decision regarding the general use of MP3 on Wikipedia is. Thanks! - SCEhard T 23:26, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for correcting my edit to AmigaOS. Your edit summary said "There is much debate wrt exec.library being a microkernel". I wasn't aware of that. Are there any good URLs for this debate? Thanks in advance, CWC (talk) 03:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
The Jargon File at the bottom of the page documents them in full. - Saaber 17:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
My dear editor friends, we have a dispute to resolve.
It seems that we three only had taken care of this argument AVM. Other people prefer not commenting it.
This page has stated during Voting for Deletion it has not to be deleted but to be merged into 68k article.
It has been removed the Request for Undeletion, because infactAVM article it has been not decided for deletion.
But merging with 68K is a mistake and sure I can't merge the article into 68k. Else I will commit a false, and I don't want to.
Amiga Anywhere and ABOX have nothing in common with 68k code.
Just Amithlon while booting it starts an environment in which 68K code runs natively and ABOX has both built-in 68K code interpreter as long with PPC Amiga WarpUP interpreter (WarpUP is PPC Amiga executable fileformat for the Amiga classic subsystem running on CPU expansion card qith PPC 601 and 603e processor).
It seems to me that: Ljl he said that it could be started Amiga Anywhere article. He said there is no virtual machine that it could be considered Amiga Machine he also said I created a neologism.
I don't understood Mdwh position if he want article deleted at all, or just condsidered AVM as not correct at all and the arguments have to be dropped.
To both of you editors I remember that AVM is NOT a neologism. It is commonly used amongst amigans, but evidenceds I had bringing seems not convince you both.
But sure AVM is no a neologism. It is just a CATEGORY name which groups in a summary some brief informations about various objects with common characteristics.
The three existing Amiga VM (note that I just drop the fourth, Petunia, because has different characteristics which brings it into some sort of emulator like multi-purpose program) it is far more pratical that all three these arguments should have a common article which LISTS all the three virtual environments here in ONE article with AVM name.
It is just necessary because of reasons of logical order and search purposes by users of Wikipedia.
It could be that users searching for any kind of virtual machines want to access that data.
So there they can find just a summary of the three amiga VM. Else ifthey want refine their search only if they want to, by clicking on a single Virtual environment link and seek for its complete article.
(Example: it is just as Music ->Folk Music or Classical or Rock Music, then searching for Rock Music->Hard Rock.
At this point the user could refine the search in Hard Rock or decide other choices.
With AVM article existing the user could make these choices: Computer->Amiga->AVM->Amiga Anywhere or Computer->Virtual Machine->Amiga Virtual Machine, etc.)
This is my point of view. I will send a copy of it to both of you to define this dispute.
If we could find an agreement as Wikipedia advices as a first step of dispute resolving, then it will be fine to me.
If not, then sure we three had had follow all the steps for a friendly resolution and in the end I could start a Request for Comment, as long it has been decided this article could not be undeleted, just because the fact it has never been deleted.
Sincerely,--Raffaele Megabyte 01:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, could you help me with the "rolling R"? I cannot speak it.-- Julius-r 17:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
I read that you are from Milan. So you should know, then, that the Italian ISTAT has informed that the Italian population has reached the 60 million mark last month. That is why I have erased the "about". And to tell the truth I should have written "about 62 million" because there are in Italy nearly 2 million illegal immigrants to add to that number. But we are dealing with "mother tongue" and I am going to accept your opinion. Ciao. -- Paul0559 ( talk) 03:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
it actually had an important point to make, although the presentation was far from clear: milanese-italian (i.e. the variety of italian spoken in Milan) is one of the most influential dialects (of italian) at the sociolinguistic level (because of the prominent economic position that Milan enjoys). This must not be confused with Milanese, which is a variety of Western Lombard, NOT of Italian, and which is an L language in teh diglossic scenario. -- Dakrismeno ( talk) 16:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Please keep in mind that I was replying to User:RicoCorinth, NOT to User:Redthoreau, and for that reason I used single indentation (":"). I believe that is proper use of indentation, and since it is the second time already that User:Redthoreau changes my indentation (and in the former case, moves my paragraph) making it appear as if they were the ones I was replying to, I thought I would point this out. LjL ( talk) 22:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Here's when to put a disambig note on top: Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Usage_guidelines. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 15:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Re this edit [1] to Internet Relay Chat, as of revision 258665623 where {{ morefootnotes}} was added [2] the references were quite poor. I had been considering removing the template you just removed but didn't think it was quite ready (although it was getting borderline). Overall the article still as a long way to go though. -- Tothwolf ( talk) 18:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome! Happy Editing :) TubularWorld ( talk) 21:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I thought it was under the next cite, but I could be wrong, feel free to add them back if it isn't in it though, I could be wrong. -- Conor Fallon ( talk) 00:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
You made a good call here. Keep up your good work.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 23:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
If you have a handle on the CPU articles, I'll leave them to you. I was mainly trying to add a few refs and the databooks (when they can still be found) since the other editor was taking such issue with them. The Websters quotation books [3] [4] make heavy use Wikipedia content and note it with [WP]. -- Tothwolf ( talk) 22:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
In the game and in real life, planes (and also cars) reduce speed to avoid hitting another plane (or car) in front of them. Simple? OhanaUnited Talk page 01:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I was pleasantly surprised at your withdrawal of the nomination. I've done all I can with the sources available to me - it has now got three citations and some more detail. Fences& Windows 21:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. Someone has mentioned your name as in a dispute at this page and I have volunteered to mediate the case as part of the Mediation Cabal. Please read the "mediator notes" section of the case page for further instructions. Thank you, GrooveDog ( talk) ( Review) 02:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
It seems you've taken an interest in my research on the bias in the Pandeism article. I hope you favor a fair and correct telling of the history of things like this. Since by the grace of good fortune you also speak Italian, perhaps you would be so noble as to confirm the correctness of my received translation? The entire passage may readily be viewed on google books, which is here, http://books.google.com/books?id=viE7AAAAcAAJ&pg=RA1-PA16&dq=pandeismo Theoph876 ( talk) 22:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! Theoph876 ( talk) 19:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
http://landley.net/history/mirror/intel/faggin.html
Re [7] because ISBN-13s are not fully supported and often fail when attempting to do lookups via the Special:Booksources links. I'm not sure who added the Please use the 13-digit one if available bit to WP:ISBN but that is wrong. ISBN-10s are industry standard and are trivial to convert to ISBN-13 but as of today ISBN-13 is just not widely supported by 3rd parties. Btw, you also undid my other edits. -- Tothwolf ( talk) 02:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments states, "If a user removes a comment from their own talk page it should not be restored." -- You just did that. Please stop. -- Rico 20:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
I've taken our disputes to ANI. -- Rico 21:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Just thinking we should provide a verbal description of what the numbers indicate as per WP:ALT and for further clarification. Are were these areas determined by were the person looked or having them point?-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 17:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Rorschach test has been filed with the Mediation Committee (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rorschach test and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not.
Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy; further information on Wikipedia's policy on resolving disagreements is at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes.
If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an active mediator of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list ( click here for details).
Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission.
I already warned the user, twice, technically. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Seem the NYTs has misspoke about who added the common discriptions of the inkblot. Have emailed the gentlemen who wrote it as if I remember right it was you. Anyway good work. Cheers.-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 14:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
You seem to be inadvertently adding random characters to the top business, i.e. [9] [10] [11] [12] . Not sure if these are browser errors (?) or just typos. You might consider using "section edit" which will focus on the particular section you are commenting on and hopefully avoid errant letters. cheers, – xeno talk 15:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey LJL you are mentioned here: http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=answers-to-the-rorschach-test-revea-09-08-02 I think the Becks depression index is here I do not know about the MPPI :-) -- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 01:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rorschach test images. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 16:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I support your effort to better improve the organization and access to these images. They may all have to be looked into place like those on the Rorschach page however. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 19:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
For your ongoing promotion of freedom of information and the virtues of Wikipedia in spite of strong opposition. Keep up the good work. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 23:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC) |
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 07:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
i did not put destitution i put deposition which is obviously better than destitution since that word means another thing, but deposition means exactly what i refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Manuel_Zelaya#it_was_not_a_Coup_d.27_Etat Vercetticarl ( talk) 23:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
what 80.223.214.74 says totally makes sense, please answer me why wikipedia does recognize coup leader Andry Rajoelina to be the faithfully president of Madagascar, and Micheletti is not consider president? what's the difference? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Honduras#Honduras_President Vercetticarl ( talk) 00:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
¿Porqué pusiste esa plantilla innecesariamente?. Ese artículo no tiene ninguna citation needed (cita requerida). Tampoco se puede exigir referencias para todo. un saludo...-- El estremeñu ( talk) 20:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I am sorry. Sometimes I am thoom. -- El estremeñu ( talk) 22:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Please, correct the errors in the article
La posada de los muertos. --
El estremeñu (
talk) 23:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)