This page is an
archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
We all make mistakes, don't worry about it! I ended up reporting the person you reverted not knowing myself that they weren't vandalising, but fixing the article. Keep at the good work!
MattWT (
talk)
20:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thankspam
Thanks to everyone who participated in
my RfA, regardless of their !vote. I have withdrawn the nomination as a failure at 19 supports, 45 opposes, and 9 neutral statements.
As has been written and sung, you can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you get what you need — and what I need is to go back to working on our shared project. Not everyone has to be an admin; there is a role for each of us. After reflection, I feel I don't have the temperament to secure community consensus as an admin at any point, and I will not be applying again in the future — and hey, that's all right, 'cause I stay true to the philosophy that adminship is no big deal: I tried, I failed, and now I'll return to doing what I've always done. I have an extremely strong belief in the consensus process, and the consensus was clear. I will be devoting my energies to volunteering at MedCab and working up a complete series of articles on the short stories of Ernest Hemingway, among lord knows what else. Thanks again to everyone who spared the time to weigh in on this one. It was made in better faith than it probably seemed. Mr. IP《
Defender of Open Editing》14:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
...for participating in
my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up
a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazimoff21:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in
my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (
talk)09:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Re:Extremely late Editor Review thanks
Hi! You're of course welcome. But, you at least got one review, whereas my request is still pending! Not a single review! So, you're definitely lucky at that. Happy editing! Regards. —KetanPanchaltaLK13:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Woland (
talk)
23:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello again to those of
WikiProject Oregon. It is time again for another Collaboration of the Week. The last two weeks were a Stub Improvement Drive, and thank you to those who improved any Stubs.
This week marks the one week anniversary of the COTW, so a brief highlight reel:
At least 10 DYKs
Three articles passed GA after being listed at COTW
Probably around 25 articles started
Almost all Top importance articles are now better than Stub class
I know. I actually didn't see the line above it, and when I saved, I was outside. Instead of fixing it, I added a witty (in my opinion) comment. :)--
LAAFan16:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
No, It's fine. By the way, here is your reward for signing
LAAFan has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool
here. Before you do so, please read the tool's
guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join
#wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the
mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. ——
RyanLupin •
(talk)17:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Little Mountain 5/Archive 3, I wish to say thanks for your support in my successful
request for adminship, which ended with 82 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to your expectations. I would especially like to thank
Rlevse for nominating me and
Wizardman for co-nominating me. — JGHowestalk - 19 August 2008
Thank you for voting in
my RfA, which did not succeed with 41 support, 21 oppose, and 1 neutral. I appreciate both the supports and the opposes. Thanks again and cheers! TN‑
X-
Man18:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I just wanted to pass along my thanks for your support in my RfA from earlier this week. I hope I did not disappoint you. I am going on Wikibreak and I will let you know when or if I am back on the site -- I am trying to take time away to clear my thoughts and refocus on this and other priorities. Be well.
Ecoleetage (
talk)
04:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Howdy folks, its time for this week’s edition of
Oregon’s Collaboration of the Week. First off, great job the last two weeks with
Greg Oden & the
Hospital red link drive. We had close to ten new hospital articles and two DYKs () plus other improvements to the list itself. So thank you to those who helped out. This week, we have on a sad note Kevin Duckworth, and the Statesman Journal. Duckworth should have plenty of sources so hopefully in tribute we can get his article up to standards. With the SJ, hopefully we can get it above a stub so all three of the top three papers are no longer stubs, and maybe even a DYK and GA like we got from the Register-Guard? Once again,
click here to opt out of these messages, or
click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Hasta la bye bye.
Aboutmovies (
talk)
20:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (
talk)
02:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
This page is an
archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
We all make mistakes, don't worry about it! I ended up reporting the person you reverted not knowing myself that they weren't vandalising, but fixing the article. Keep at the good work!
MattWT (
talk)
20:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thankspam
Thanks to everyone who participated in
my RfA, regardless of their !vote. I have withdrawn the nomination as a failure at 19 supports, 45 opposes, and 9 neutral statements.
As has been written and sung, you can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you get what you need — and what I need is to go back to working on our shared project. Not everyone has to be an admin; there is a role for each of us. After reflection, I feel I don't have the temperament to secure community consensus as an admin at any point, and I will not be applying again in the future — and hey, that's all right, 'cause I stay true to the philosophy that adminship is no big deal: I tried, I failed, and now I'll return to doing what I've always done. I have an extremely strong belief in the consensus process, and the consensus was clear. I will be devoting my energies to volunteering at MedCab and working up a complete series of articles on the short stories of Ernest Hemingway, among lord knows what else. Thanks again to everyone who spared the time to weigh in on this one. It was made in better faith than it probably seemed. Mr. IP《
Defender of Open Editing》14:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
...for participating in
my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up
a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazimoff21:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in
my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (
talk)09:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Re:Extremely late Editor Review thanks
Hi! You're of course welcome. But, you at least got one review, whereas my request is still pending! Not a single review! So, you're definitely lucky at that. Happy editing! Regards. —KetanPanchaltaLK13:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Woland (
talk)
23:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello again to those of
WikiProject Oregon. It is time again for another Collaboration of the Week. The last two weeks were a Stub Improvement Drive, and thank you to those who improved any Stubs.
This week marks the one week anniversary of the COTW, so a brief highlight reel:
At least 10 DYKs
Three articles passed GA after being listed at COTW
Probably around 25 articles started
Almost all Top importance articles are now better than Stub class
I know. I actually didn't see the line above it, and when I saved, I was outside. Instead of fixing it, I added a witty (in my opinion) comment. :)--
LAAFan16:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
No, It's fine. By the way, here is your reward for signing
LAAFan has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool
here. Before you do so, please read the tool's
guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join
#wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the
mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. ——
RyanLupin •
(talk)17:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Little Mountain 5/Archive 3, I wish to say thanks for your support in my successful
request for adminship, which ended with 82 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to your expectations. I would especially like to thank
Rlevse for nominating me and
Wizardman for co-nominating me. — JGHowestalk - 19 August 2008
Thank you for voting in
my RfA, which did not succeed with 41 support, 21 oppose, and 1 neutral. I appreciate both the supports and the opposes. Thanks again and cheers! TN‑
X-
Man18:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I just wanted to pass along my thanks for your support in my RfA from earlier this week. I hope I did not disappoint you. I am going on Wikibreak and I will let you know when or if I am back on the site -- I am trying to take time away to clear my thoughts and refocus on this and other priorities. Be well.
Ecoleetage (
talk)
04:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Howdy folks, its time for this week’s edition of
Oregon’s Collaboration of the Week. First off, great job the last two weeks with
Greg Oden & the
Hospital red link drive. We had close to ten new hospital articles and two DYKs () plus other improvements to the list itself. So thank you to those who helped out. This week, we have on a sad note Kevin Duckworth, and the Statesman Journal. Duckworth should have plenty of sources so hopefully in tribute we can get his article up to standards. With the SJ, hopefully we can get it above a stub so all three of the top three papers are no longer stubs, and maybe even a DYK and GA like we got from the Register-Guard? Once again,
click here to opt out of these messages, or
click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Hasta la bye bye.
Aboutmovies (
talk)
20:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (
talk)
02:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
) plus other improvements to the list itself. So thank you to those who helped out. This week, we have on a sad note
Kevin Duckworth, and the
Statesman Journal. Duckworth should have plenty of sources so hopefully in tribute we can get his article up to standards. With the SJ, hopefully we can get it above a stub so all three of the top three papers are no longer stubs, and maybe even a DYK and GA like we got from the Register-Guard? Once again,
click here to opt out of these messages, or
click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Hasta la bye bye.
Aboutmovies (
talk)
20:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)