|
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Erica Andrews shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Coffeepusher ( talk) 01:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Don't falsely accuse other editors of being vandals [1] just because they are quite correctly reverting your non-policy, purely promotional edits. If you keep up your WP:EDITWAR over this, you are headed for a block. Thank you. Qworty ( talk) 01:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Stop falsely accusing others, as you did here [2]. I edited the article in question ONE TIME in the past 2+ weeks--that is not edit warring. In fact, YOU are the one warring on the article, which you should also stop doing at once. You are a highly disruptive editor and I think you should be blocked, and soon. Qworty ( talk) 01:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Erica Andrews". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 May 2013.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
02:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Coffeepusher ( talk) 04:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- John ( talk) 05:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perot Museum of Nature and Science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dallas County Courthouse ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello Lightspeedx, my name is Howicus. I'm a volunteer at WP:DRN, and I wanted to let you know that I've responded to your DRN case here [3], and I've asked you a couple of questions there. Please respond when it's convenient for you. Howicus ( talk) 13:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Erica Andrews, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
User:PhilKnight (
talk)
11:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Coffeepusher ( talk) 03:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I'm a bit busy with other quality improvement drives right now, so I don't have time to look into this. Good luck to you in your quality improvement efforts. I'd suggest you read WP:BRD, WP:Dispute resolution, WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:Article development. — Cirt ( talk) 21:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Erica Andrews shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Coffeepusher ( talk) 01:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Don't falsely accuse other editors of being vandals [1] just because they are quite correctly reverting your non-policy, purely promotional edits. If you keep up your WP:EDITWAR over this, you are headed for a block. Thank you. Qworty ( talk) 01:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Stop falsely accusing others, as you did here [2]. I edited the article in question ONE TIME in the past 2+ weeks--that is not edit warring. In fact, YOU are the one warring on the article, which you should also stop doing at once. You are a highly disruptive editor and I think you should be blocked, and soon. Qworty ( talk) 01:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Erica Andrews". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 May 2013.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
02:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Coffeepusher ( talk) 04:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- John ( talk) 05:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perot Museum of Nature and Science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dallas County Courthouse ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello Lightspeedx, my name is Howicus. I'm a volunteer at WP:DRN, and I wanted to let you know that I've responded to your DRN case here [3], and I've asked you a couple of questions there. Please respond when it's convenient for you. Howicus ( talk) 13:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Erica Andrews, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
User:PhilKnight (
talk)
11:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Coffeepusher ( talk) 03:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I'm a bit busy with other quality improvement drives right now, so I don't have time to look into this. Good luck to you in your quality improvement efforts. I'd suggest you read WP:BRD, WP:Dispute resolution, WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:Article development. — Cirt ( talk) 21:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)