Maybe instead of falsely claiming that I've mentioned the CDC recently, you could actually respond to questions I've asked on the talk page. Remember also I think we need dispute resolution. Thanks.
Lightningstrikers (
talk) 02:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Occupational stress, you may be blocked from editing. – CaroleHenson ( talk) 01:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
User_talk:CaroleHenson#January_2020. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
——
SN
54129 02:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
gaining a reputation for lyingis not...) —— SN 54129 02:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Occupational stress shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Both of you have broken 3RR on this article.
Meters (
talk) 06:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 02:36, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Maybe instead of falsely claiming that I've mentioned the CDC recently, you could actually respond to questions I've asked on the talk page. Remember also I think we need dispute resolution. Thanks.
Lightningstrikers (
talk) 02:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Occupational stress, you may be blocked from editing. – CaroleHenson ( talk) 01:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
User_talk:CaroleHenson#January_2020. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
——
SN
54129 02:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
gaining a reputation for lyingis not...) —— SN 54129 02:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Occupational stress shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Both of you have broken 3RR on this article.
Meters (
talk) 06:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 02:36, 11 January 2020 (UTC)