![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
| |||||||
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions. |
kelapstick( bainuu) 09:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks kelapstick!
![]() |
Hi Liberty Pedia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Thanks for your contribution on 2013 Shahbag Protests article. But one thing keep in mind, after every editing add a summary on edit summary box. It will help other wikipedians to understand your cause of edit. Thank you.-- Freemesm ( talk) 16:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Liberty Pedia. I'm sorry for reverting one of the edits you made to the article ( [1]), but you added both a number of duplicated sources and repeated information. Thanks for your comprehension.-- Jetstreamer Talk 11:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Liberty Pedia, First of all take heartiest greetings from Bengali Wikipedia Community.
In order to celebrate it's 10 year Bengali Wikipedia has arranged a
photography contest at Wikimedia Commons. It is scheduled to, start at 1 September 2014 00:00 (UTC) and end at 31 October 2014 00:00 (UTC). We welcome you participate there. Hoping to see you at the contest
. Thanks.
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Pratyya Ghosh ( talk · contribs) 15:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Can you please stop relocating the <ref name="Biman Bangladesh Airlines orders three Q400s"/> reference in the lead? It does not support the entire sentence.-- Jetstreamer Talk 13:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Liberty Pedia, I urge you to be more careful when interpreting sources in articles. I've given you a warning here. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 02:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I have noticed that you removed an image showing a scan of a Bangladeshi passport cover with an artist's impression of a Bangladeshi passport cover. I believe that we should not use an artist's impression or a drawing in a case where we have a real image available.-- Twofortnights ( talk) 16:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Biman Bangladesh Airlines, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Jetstreamer
Talk
23:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
The statement " He was followed, some months later, by two Bangladeshi women who also reached the top of Mount Everest. " is unsourced and not significant. Also only the first is notable, just because something has been done by a woman does not mean it has to be notable. Cite WP:RS for additions like these. Same goes for the statement Bangladesh women's national football team has also registered notable success at regional level, especially the Under-15 and Under-18 teams. Unless they won a tournament it does not seem notable. And adding un-sourced contents is disruptive editing. Respected Person ( talk) 18:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
User:Liberty Pedia the article Bangladesh is not a feminist article. Just because something is done by a woman it does not become automatically notable. It is the person regardless of gender who does something for the first time that makes it notable. Please stop promoting feminism here. There are many men and women who went on top of Everest after Musa Ibrahim, it is not important to add them all, and Nishat Mazumder has no importance, this is nothing gender selective, if you think she should be added, then add everyone who went atop of Everest from the country. Removing the information for lack of notability, you aren't even bothering to co-operate by justifying reason for inclusion and are borderline edit warring. Respected Person ( talk) 17:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Bangladesh. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —— SN 54129 12:52, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose
sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow
Wikipedia's policies, or the
page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
| |||||||
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions. |
kelapstick( bainuu) 09:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks kelapstick!
![]() |
Hi Liberty Pedia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Thanks for your contribution on 2013 Shahbag Protests article. But one thing keep in mind, after every editing add a summary on edit summary box. It will help other wikipedians to understand your cause of edit. Thank you.-- Freemesm ( talk) 16:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Liberty Pedia. I'm sorry for reverting one of the edits you made to the article ( [1]), but you added both a number of duplicated sources and repeated information. Thanks for your comprehension.-- Jetstreamer Talk 11:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Liberty Pedia, First of all take heartiest greetings from Bengali Wikipedia Community.
In order to celebrate it's 10 year Bengali Wikipedia has arranged a
photography contest at Wikimedia Commons. It is scheduled to, start at 1 September 2014 00:00 (UTC) and end at 31 October 2014 00:00 (UTC). We welcome you participate there. Hoping to see you at the contest
. Thanks.
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Pratyya Ghosh ( talk · contribs) 15:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Can you please stop relocating the <ref name="Biman Bangladesh Airlines orders three Q400s"/> reference in the lead? It does not support the entire sentence.-- Jetstreamer Talk 13:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Liberty Pedia, I urge you to be more careful when interpreting sources in articles. I've given you a warning here. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 02:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I have noticed that you removed an image showing a scan of a Bangladeshi passport cover with an artist's impression of a Bangladeshi passport cover. I believe that we should not use an artist's impression or a drawing in a case where we have a real image available.-- Twofortnights ( talk) 16:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Biman Bangladesh Airlines, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Jetstreamer
Talk
23:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
The statement " He was followed, some months later, by two Bangladeshi women who also reached the top of Mount Everest. " is unsourced and not significant. Also only the first is notable, just because something has been done by a woman does not mean it has to be notable. Cite WP:RS for additions like these. Same goes for the statement Bangladesh women's national football team has also registered notable success at regional level, especially the Under-15 and Under-18 teams. Unless they won a tournament it does not seem notable. And adding un-sourced contents is disruptive editing. Respected Person ( talk) 18:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
User:Liberty Pedia the article Bangladesh is not a feminist article. Just because something is done by a woman it does not become automatically notable. It is the person regardless of gender who does something for the first time that makes it notable. Please stop promoting feminism here. There are many men and women who went on top of Everest after Musa Ibrahim, it is not important to add them all, and Nishat Mazumder has no importance, this is nothing gender selective, if you think she should be added, then add everyone who went atop of Everest from the country. Removing the information for lack of notability, you aren't even bothering to co-operate by justifying reason for inclusion and are borderline edit warring. Respected Person ( talk) 17:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Bangladesh. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —— SN 54129 12:52, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose
sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow
Wikipedia's policies, or the
page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.