გამარჯობა, შეგიძლია glგადახედო სპერის და დიაოხის გვერდებს?
სპერიში ორ ადგილას წერია რომ ჰაიასა-აზის ტერიტორიაზე მდებარეობდა და წყარო არის მითითებული History of Georgia(იგივე ქართლი ცხოვრებაა ეს წიგნი :დ). მეორე ადგილასაც იგივე წერია და history of Georgia-სთან ერთად 4-5 წყაროა მითითებული და არცერთში არ წერია მსგავსი ინფორმაცია. ჩვეულებრივი სიყალბეა. მე მელიქიშვილის, ინგოროყვას და სხვების წყაროები-ინფორმაციები მქონდა დაწერილი, ასევე სპერის რუკაც და წამიშალა ერთმა. განხილვის გვერდზეც დავწერე და არავინ მიაქცია ყურადღება ან მიპასუხა.
დიაოხშიც ასევე სამი სომხური წყარო დაამატეს რომელიც წლების წინ წაშალეს, ამ სამიდან 1-ში სიტყვა დიაოხი მითითებულ გვერდზე ნახსენებიც არ არის და დანარჩენი 2 წყარო არ იძებნება საერთოდ. მსგავსი სიყალბეები არის კიდევ დამატებული დიაოხში, რომელიც დეტალურად არის ახსნილი განხილვის გვერდზეც.
ორივე გვერდზე(სპერიზე და დიაოხზეც) რევერთი გააკეთა ერთმა და იმავე პიროვნებამ, რომელიც განხილვის გვერდზე დებატებშიც არ შედის და ყოველგვარი მიზეზის გარეშე აკეთებს რევერთს, მოტივი ნაციონალისტურია, რომ შეამოწმებ მის პროფილს მიხვდები. აქაც დიაოხზე ბევრი რაღაცები მქონდა გაკეთებული და წამიშალა. გთხოვ გადახედე ამ გვერდებს, შემდეგ ნახე ბოლო რევერტები და თუ ნახავ რომ ყველაფერი სწორად მაქვს ახსნილი და დამატებული დააბრუნე ისევ ის გვერდი.
@ Lemabeta: გამარჯობა, ჩრდილოეთ კავკასიის მთიელთა რესპუბლიკის გვერდზე და აბასგიის გვერდზე გეოდას ცდილობს რომ გადააკეთოს ინფორმაცია, ჩრდილოეთ კავკასიის რესპუბლიკის გვერდზე ცდილობს რომ ჩაამატოს რუკა სადაც ისეა ნაჩვენები თითქოს აფხაზეთი მაგის ნაწილი იყო და არა საქართველოსი, აბასგიის გვერდზე ცდილობს ყველაფერ ქართულზე ინფორმაცია წაშალოს, ეს დიდი ალბათობით არის ალშო093-ის ალტერაქაუნთი რომელიც აფხაზეთის სამთავროზე ცდილობდა ინფორმაციის დამახინჯებას, იმავე გვერდებზეც იგივეს აკეთებდა დაბლოკვამდე და იგივე summery უწერია კომენტარებზე "პროთექშან ეგეინსთ ვანდალიზმ" და მსგავსები, ასევე სულ პირველი კომენტარი დაბლოკვის შემდეგ მალევე აფხაზეთის სამთავროს განხილვის გვერდზე აქვს გაკეთებული. თუ შეგიძლია ინფორმაცია შეასწორო და გეოდას დაარეპორტო როგორც სოქფაფეთი.
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ilia Topuria, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 22:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khamzat Chimaev. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden ( talk) 13:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
a455bcd9 (Antoine) ( talk) 21:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Adjarians. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This type of edit will result in you being tbaned or blocked. [1] // Timothy :: talk 08:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 17:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Nswix ( talk) 14:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
According to the rules (Here: DRN Rule D), as the administrator said, it is not correct to answer in the section that you have done. Read the administrator carefully. We both need to be careful, because they may close the thread. I suggest to delete your last reply, If you want.
I answer you here:
- The UFC website as a format only supports one flag. Ilia apparently chose the Georgian flag, but that does not mean that he doesnt officialy represents Spain. The official UFC account also has widely used both flags to represent it. [1]
- Ilia, in fact, feels very Spanish, and has even gotten angry many times because some (maybe racists) Spanish journalists have treated him as non-Spanish. [2] He has always said that he represents Spain and Georgia, they are his two nations.
That said, I fully respect that you are from the Caucasus, and I consider Ilia as proud Georgian, but he also represents Spain as a fighter, he considers himself also Spanish (He even has Spanish citizeship), and representative of Spain. Georgia is never excluded with this. DrakeXper ( talk) 11:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Please be aware that all articles related to politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, or both—broadly construed and explicitly including the Armenian genocide—are subject to an extended confirmed restriction. KhndzorUtogh ( talk) 22:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Matzoon. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vanezi ( talk) 11:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Vanezi ( talk) 12:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, I have opened a sockpuppet investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Əzərbəyəniləri for a user named User talk:Frankish Human with which you have been engaged in an edit dispute on the Matzoon page [8]. I believe the user's behavior is suspicious and should be examined.
If you also have concerns about the user's behavior feel free to make a comment under the investigation in the provided space (or not, up to you)
Cheers,
- Creffel ( talk) 15:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Lemabeta! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Again, welcome!
> Tesseractic:
talk?
✎
20:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pankisi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TSU. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
გამარჯობა, შეგიძლია glგადახედო სპერის და დიაოხის გვერდებს?
სპერიში ორ ადგილას წერია რომ ჰაიასა-აზის ტერიტორიაზე მდებარეობდა და წყარო არის მითითებული History of Georgia(იგივე ქართლი ცხოვრებაა ეს წიგნი :დ). მეორე ადგილასაც იგივე წერია და history of Georgia-სთან ერთად 4-5 წყაროა მითითებული და არცერთში არ წერია მსგავსი ინფორმაცია. ჩვეულებრივი სიყალბეა. მე მელიქიშვილის, ინგოროყვას და სხვების წყაროები-ინფორმაციები მქონდა დაწერილი, ასევე სპერის რუკაც და წამიშალა ერთმა. განხილვის გვერდზეც დავწერე და არავინ მიაქცია ყურადღება ან მიპასუხა.
დიაოხშიც ასევე სამი სომხური წყარო დაამატეს რომელიც წლების წინ წაშალეს, ამ სამიდან 1-ში სიტყვა დიაოხი მითითებულ გვერდზე ნახსენებიც არ არის და დანარჩენი 2 წყარო არ იძებნება საერთოდ. მსგავსი სიყალბეები არის კიდევ დამატებული დიაოხში, რომელიც დეტალურად არის ახსნილი განხილვის გვერდზეც.
ორივე გვერდზე(სპერიზე და დიაოხზეც) რევერთი გააკეთა ერთმა და იმავე პიროვნებამ, რომელიც განხილვის გვერდზე დებატებშიც არ შედის და ყოველგვარი მიზეზის გარეშე აკეთებს რევერთს, მოტივი ნაციონალისტურია, რომ შეამოწმებ მის პროფილს მიხვდები. აქაც დიაოხზე ბევრი რაღაცები მქონდა გაკეთებული და წამიშალა. გთხოვ გადახედე ამ გვერდებს, შემდეგ ნახე ბოლო რევერტები და თუ ნახავ რომ ყველაფერი სწორად მაქვს ახსნილი და დამატებული დააბრუნე ისევ ის გვერდი.
@ Lemabeta: გამარჯობა, ჩრდილოეთ კავკასიის მთიელთა რესპუბლიკის გვერდზე და აბასგიის გვერდზე გეოდას ცდილობს რომ გადააკეთოს ინფორმაცია, ჩრდილოეთ კავკასიის რესპუბლიკის გვერდზე ცდილობს რომ ჩაამატოს რუკა სადაც ისეა ნაჩვენები თითქოს აფხაზეთი მაგის ნაწილი იყო და არა საქართველოსი, აბასგიის გვერდზე ცდილობს ყველაფერ ქართულზე ინფორმაცია წაშალოს, ეს დიდი ალბათობით არის ალშო093-ის ალტერაქაუნთი რომელიც აფხაზეთის სამთავროზე ცდილობდა ინფორმაციის დამახინჯებას, იმავე გვერდებზეც იგივეს აკეთებდა დაბლოკვამდე და იგივე summery უწერია კომენტარებზე "პროთექშან ეგეინსთ ვანდალიზმ" და მსგავსები, ასევე სულ პირველი კომენტარი დაბლოკვის შემდეგ მალევე აფხაზეთის სამთავროს განხილვის გვერდზე აქვს გაკეთებული. თუ შეგიძლია ინფორმაცია შეასწორო და გეოდას დაარეპორტო როგორც სოქფაფეთი.
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ilia Topuria, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 22:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khamzat Chimaev. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden ( talk) 13:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
a455bcd9 (Antoine) ( talk) 21:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Adjarians. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This type of edit will result in you being tbaned or blocked. [1] // Timothy :: talk 08:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 17:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Nswix ( talk) 14:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
According to the rules (Here: DRN Rule D), as the administrator said, it is not correct to answer in the section that you have done. Read the administrator carefully. We both need to be careful, because they may close the thread. I suggest to delete your last reply, If you want.
I answer you here:
- The UFC website as a format only supports one flag. Ilia apparently chose the Georgian flag, but that does not mean that he doesnt officialy represents Spain. The official UFC account also has widely used both flags to represent it. [1]
- Ilia, in fact, feels very Spanish, and has even gotten angry many times because some (maybe racists) Spanish journalists have treated him as non-Spanish. [2] He has always said that he represents Spain and Georgia, they are his two nations.
That said, I fully respect that you are from the Caucasus, and I consider Ilia as proud Georgian, but he also represents Spain as a fighter, he considers himself also Spanish (He even has Spanish citizeship), and representative of Spain. Georgia is never excluded with this. DrakeXper ( talk) 11:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Please be aware that all articles related to politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, or both—broadly construed and explicitly including the Armenian genocide—are subject to an extended confirmed restriction. KhndzorUtogh ( talk) 22:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Matzoon. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vanezi ( talk) 11:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Vanezi ( talk) 12:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, I have opened a sockpuppet investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Əzərbəyəniləri for a user named User talk:Frankish Human with which you have been engaged in an edit dispute on the Matzoon page [8]. I believe the user's behavior is suspicious and should be examined.
If you also have concerns about the user's behavior feel free to make a comment under the investigation in the provided space (or not, up to you)
Cheers,
- Creffel ( talk) 15:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Lemabeta! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Again, welcome!
> Tesseractic:
talk?
✎
20:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pankisi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TSU. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)