I restored the Scientist infobox for two reasons. First and foremost, you should have discussed such changes on the Talk page to determine how others feel about the change. That is standard procedure on Wikipedia for major (and potentially controversial) changes. Secondly, although Freud's work covers several areas, his training was in medicine and he practiced as a physician. And it is grossly inaccurate to describe his work as "19th century". He did most of his work at the turn of the century and later. Ward3001 ( talk) 00:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on the nice summary of structuralist thought in Lévi-Strauss' ideas you just added. It would probably be a good idea to add some direct references, before some of these more stupid Wikipedia editor/admin types wipes out your pretty original contribution. Regards, warshy ( talk) 19:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Value.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 13:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. I am a member of WikiProject Anthropology, where we are currently trying to develop the article on kinship, which is, as you can see, in a very poor state. Levi-Strauss' Elementary Structures of Kinship should, of course, be considered a key text for that article, and I'm very keen to make sure that his contribution to our understanding of kinship is properly represented. As you are clearly interested in writing about Levi-Strauss' thought, perhaps you'd care to visit the talk page for the kinship article and offer your thoughts on what should be included and how best to include it? Thanks for your time! Robotforaday ( talk) 03:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Le vin blanc!
We thank you for uploading
Image:SemioticValue.PNG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes
copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a
copyright tag, it may be
deleted by an
Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a
copyright tag to the
image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a
robot. --
John Bot III (
talk)
17:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I reverted your recent edits in this article. The links you deleted as 'dead' appear active to me. Was there some mistake? Regards, Alcmaeonid ( talk) 14:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
I restored the Scientist infobox for two reasons. First and foremost, you should have discussed such changes on the Talk page to determine how others feel about the change. That is standard procedure on Wikipedia for major (and potentially controversial) changes. Secondly, although Freud's work covers several areas, his training was in medicine and he practiced as a physician. And it is grossly inaccurate to describe his work as "19th century". He did most of his work at the turn of the century and later. Ward3001 ( talk) 00:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on the nice summary of structuralist thought in Lévi-Strauss' ideas you just added. It would probably be a good idea to add some direct references, before some of these more stupid Wikipedia editor/admin types wipes out your pretty original contribution. Regards, warshy ( talk) 19:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Value.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 13:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. I am a member of WikiProject Anthropology, where we are currently trying to develop the article on kinship, which is, as you can see, in a very poor state. Levi-Strauss' Elementary Structures of Kinship should, of course, be considered a key text for that article, and I'm very keen to make sure that his contribution to our understanding of kinship is properly represented. As you are clearly interested in writing about Levi-Strauss' thought, perhaps you'd care to visit the talk page for the kinship article and offer your thoughts on what should be included and how best to include it? Thanks for your time! Robotforaday ( talk) 03:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Le vin blanc!
We thank you for uploading
Image:SemioticValue.PNG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes
copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a
copyright tag, it may be
deleted by an
Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a
copyright tag to the
image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a
robot. --
John Bot III (
talk)
17:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I reverted your recent edits in this article. The links you deleted as 'dead' appear active to me. Was there some mistake? Regards, Alcmaeonid ( talk) 14:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)