|
References 7-14 are used for the Fascist tag - those are all peer-reviewed journals/books by established academics who printing in mainstream academic journals of note. Can you please outline what is wrong *specifically* with each of those references? In terms of sourcing for wikipedia, peer reviewed mainstream academic journals are considered the highest level of sourcing. Can you outline why you don't consider those sources to be reputable?
Attempts to removed well sourced content without explaining what the issue with the sources is likely to be seen as vandalism and quickly reverted. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 17:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); External link in |location=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)CS1 maint: location (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); External link in |location=
(
help)CS1 maint: location (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); External link in |location=
(
help)CS1 maint: location (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); External link in |location=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)CS1 maint: location (
link)
This should answer some of your questions - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 19:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
|
References 7-14 are used for the Fascist tag - those are all peer-reviewed journals/books by established academics who printing in mainstream academic journals of note. Can you please outline what is wrong *specifically* with each of those references? In terms of sourcing for wikipedia, peer reviewed mainstream academic journals are considered the highest level of sourcing. Can you outline why you don't consider those sources to be reputable?
Attempts to removed well sourced content without explaining what the issue with the sources is likely to be seen as vandalism and quickly reverted. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 17:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); External link in |location=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)CS1 maint: location (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); External link in |location=
(
help)CS1 maint: location (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); External link in |location=
(
help)CS1 maint: location (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); External link in |location=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)CS1 maint: location (
link)
This should answer some of your questions - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 19:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)