Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop CutOffTies ( talk) 17:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Your content is unsourced, but in general it is not a good idea to do these similar additions to multiple articles all at once. It has the feeling of promoting the CNBC website/poll more than actually improving the articles. Thank you -- CutOffTies ( talk) 17:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CutOffTies ( talk) 17:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello Laurenrose3091. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. You seem to have a connection to CNBC CutOffTies ( talk) 17:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Talk:Texas with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Meph talk 18:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Please do not continue to revert your edits on the Minnesota page without discussion on the article [ page]. Be mindful of the three revert rule and the fact that violating it can bring a block on editing. SeanNovack ( talk) 18:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
First, please read out policy on conflict of interest and single-purpose accounts. Though CNBC meets our reliable sources policies, we do not permit canvassing of links, regardless of quality. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Which article are you discussing? Laurenrose3091 ( talk) 18:17, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't see any links. Laurenrose3091 ( talk) 18:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop CutOffTies ( talk) 17:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Your content is unsourced, but in general it is not a good idea to do these similar additions to multiple articles all at once. It has the feeling of promoting the CNBC website/poll more than actually improving the articles. Thank you -- CutOffTies ( talk) 17:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CutOffTies ( talk) 17:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello Laurenrose3091. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. You seem to have a connection to CNBC CutOffTies ( talk) 17:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Talk:Texas with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Meph talk 18:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Please do not continue to revert your edits on the Minnesota page without discussion on the article [ page]. Be mindful of the three revert rule and the fact that violating it can bring a block on editing. SeanNovack ( talk) 18:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
First, please read out policy on conflict of interest and single-purpose accounts. Though CNBC meets our reliable sources policies, we do not permit canvassing of links, regardless of quality. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Which article are you discussing? Laurenrose3091 ( talk) 18:17, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't see any links. Laurenrose3091 ( talk) 18:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)