From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Fibroceutical for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fibroceutical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibroceutical until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lane89mr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Biker Biker ( talk) 15:15, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts to try to influence the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibroceutical. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD ( talk) 15:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Fibroceutical for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fibroceutical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibroceutical until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lane89mr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Biker Biker ( talk) 15:15, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts to try to influence the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibroceutical. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD ( talk) 15:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook