Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Identity Evropa. While
objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be
a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.
Grayfell (
talk) 00:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
It wasn't meant to be promotional. It was meant to be less biased and more truthful. Lamboavent6 ( talk) 19:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Turning Point USA. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Beyond My Ken (
talk) 22:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Identity Evropa, you may be
blocked from editing.
Beyond My Ken (
talk) 22:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 11:42, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Well you guys are clearly violating your own rules, as you keep classifying them as Nazis Lamboavent6 ( talk) 20:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Antifa (United States), you may be
blocked from editing.
Tsumikiria (
T/
C) 16:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
So it's now okay to defame Identity Evropa, but evil to tell the truth about Antifa??? Lamboavent6 ( talk) 02:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Identity Evropa. While
objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be
a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.
Grayfell (
talk) 00:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
It wasn't meant to be promotional. It was meant to be less biased and more truthful. Lamboavent6 ( talk) 19:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Turning Point USA. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Beyond My Ken (
talk) 22:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Identity Evropa, you may be
blocked from editing.
Beyond My Ken (
talk) 22:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 11:42, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Well you guys are clearly violating your own rules, as you keep classifying them as Nazis Lamboavent6 ( talk) 20:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Antifa (United States), you may be
blocked from editing.
Tsumikiria (
T/
C) 16:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
So it's now okay to defame Identity Evropa, but evil to tell the truth about Antifa??? Lamboavent6 ( talk) 02:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)