Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Venus, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime ( open channel) 16:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Lajoswinkler! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! VQuakr ( talk) 17:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm happy to discuss my revert of this edit if you would like. Thanks for fighting promotion of pseudoscience in WP! VQuakr ( talk) 17:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Here you accuse me of wiki-hounding. This is a serious accusation, and inaccurate; your edits are being reverted because they are poor, not because I'm trying to distress you. If you repeat such an accusation, I will escalate the issue. If you think your edits have merit, make a case for them on the article talk pages. VQuakr ( talk) 16:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Romanowsky stain, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 20:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Venus, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime ( open channel) 16:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Lajoswinkler! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! VQuakr ( talk) 17:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm happy to discuss my revert of this edit if you would like. Thanks for fighting promotion of pseudoscience in WP! VQuakr ( talk) 17:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Here you accuse me of wiki-hounding. This is a serious accusation, and inaccurate; your edits are being reverted because they are poor, not because I'm trying to distress you. If you repeat such an accusation, I will escalate the issue. If you think your edits have merit, make a case for them on the article talk pages. VQuakr ( talk) 16:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Romanowsky stain, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 20:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)