{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike | Talk 01:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Kurt-the-parrot-hamster ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
i made an edit to the article on guy fawkes which was supported by a UK.gov reference. That edit was removed without reason by somebody calling himself kurt adkins using his various socks. How can one comment result in a block when the same person uses incivility, swearing and bigotry at anyone who tries to correct his mistakes Kurt-the-parrot-hamster ( talk) 13:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Account obviously created for harassment. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 17:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kurt-the-parrot-hamster ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
how can you "harrass" somebody with one comment when by definition it means repeated or systematic efforts to annoy - i made one remark - Moreover the one edit i made was supported by an offical government site.Kurt-the-parrot-hamster (talk) 19:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per the discussion below, I think it is likely that this account was created with the intention to disrupt Wikipedia. Sandstein 21:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This request makes no sense. There is no one named 'Kurt Adkins' in the editing history of that article, and also no incivility, swearing, or bigotry. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 13:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
The block was placed because Kurt-the-'s username, edit summaries and/or posts indicated (as do his remarks above this one) that his real goal was "outing" the editor Parrot of Doom as being this Kurt person, based on "something he read somewhere". To my considerable confusion and distress, I am not finding the remarks that first led me to this conclusion: I don't know whether they were oversighted, made while logged out, or what. I invite the feedback of my fellow admins as to where we should be going from here. -- Orange Mike | Talk 15:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike | Talk 01:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Kurt-the-parrot-hamster ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
i made an edit to the article on guy fawkes which was supported by a UK.gov reference. That edit was removed without reason by somebody calling himself kurt adkins using his various socks. How can one comment result in a block when the same person uses incivility, swearing and bigotry at anyone who tries to correct his mistakes Kurt-the-parrot-hamster ( talk) 13:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Account obviously created for harassment. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 17:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kurt-the-parrot-hamster ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
how can you "harrass" somebody with one comment when by definition it means repeated or systematic efforts to annoy - i made one remark - Moreover the one edit i made was supported by an offical government site.Kurt-the-parrot-hamster (talk) 19:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per the discussion below, I think it is likely that this account was created with the intention to disrupt Wikipedia. Sandstein 21:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This request makes no sense. There is no one named 'Kurt Adkins' in the editing history of that article, and also no incivility, swearing, or bigotry. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 13:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
The block was placed because Kurt-the-'s username, edit summaries and/or posts indicated (as do his remarks above this one) that his real goal was "outing" the editor Parrot of Doom as being this Kurt person, based on "something he read somewhere". To my considerable confusion and distress, I am not finding the remarks that first led me to this conclusion: I don't know whether they were oversighted, made while logged out, or what. I invite the feedback of my fellow admins as to where we should be going from here. -- Orange Mike | Talk 15:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)