Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Lagos. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Ronz (
talk) 17:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my talk page. Obviously, there's a dispute about the population size. Adding sourced material is fine. Adding your own personal opinion is not. Neither is outright dismissal of other sourced viewpoints. It is also problematic when you make huge changes as you did in a single edit. If you can just to add sourced material and trim unsourced material, then there shouldn't be such problems. -- Ronz ( talk) 19:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Lagos. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Ronz (
talk) 17:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my talk page. Obviously, there's a dispute about the population size. Adding sourced material is fine. Adding your own personal opinion is not. Neither is outright dismissal of other sourced viewpoints. It is also problematic when you make huge changes as you did in a single edit. If you can just to add sourced material and trim unsourced material, then there shouldn't be such problems. -- Ronz ( talk) 19:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)