Oh come now, I wasn't necessarily referring to you. Unless, you're admitting that you are a among "those that try to scare away content editors", in which case you should resign immediately. -- Scorpion 0422 19:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk)
Hi there. I saw that you removed the CSD tag I added to this article with the edit summary "Rm db-nocontext to replace with correct CSD criteria". I've been doing some NPP the past few days, and have found a handful of articles in other languages. Is there a CSD tag for foreign language articles that are not on other wikis, or a different procedure for dealing with them? I'd rather not mistag any more articles if I can avoid it. Thanks. — Torchiest talk edits 22:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up, and sorry about the oversight. I've reinstated the initial BLPPROD. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 05:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I've filled in the questionnaire on your mentoring page. Alanl ( talk) 11:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I am jaykissan.i have noticed you have deleted a page archworlds.com. but the page have its important as its related to new company established in New Delhi,India on 2012. You can give a direction to correct it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaykissan ( talk • contribs) 13:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Please unlock Begin Again as posting correct information is not what you claimed here: Protected Begin Again (Taylor Swift song): Edit warring / Content dispute ([edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 12:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 12:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC) it is unfair of you and I will be reporting you for this as well that I have given 9 sources that contradict the information posted on the page and I AM THE ONE edit warring/content disputing, there is none just 2 editors who do not want to realize that they were proven wrong. That is not fair to me and you had no right to do that. Please see the pages talk page to see my 9 sources.
You are the second person to insult me and the third that will not listen and now all of Wikipedia will pay for it thank you you have given me some great stuff to help shut this fake encyclopedia down. Oh and if you block me for this so you know that I was given legal advice to change my IP address. Wikipedia does tons of illegal stuff and has given more evidence to my case to get it shut down. Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.18.72 ( talk) 15:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Please excuse my bluntness but I have criticised your nomination of this article for deletion at the AFD and ARS. Your comments would be appreciated as it may be that I have missed some aspect of your thinking or am just being too harsh. But the matter currently seems to be symptomatic of a systemic failure; the process just isn't working as it is supposed to and so we need to rethink it. I know that you have similar views about RfA but the basic process of article improvement is even more fundamental and, if you don't get this, then who will? Warden ( talk) 23:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Could you revdelete from this revision to this revision? For some reason my revdel button isn't working. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung, can you protect a few pages in my userspace for me please? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Dori ☾ Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 23:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for being infinitely more eloquent and patient in your explanations to them than I am able to be. I deleted four different attempts at explaining what you managed to do much more articulately... mostly because all of mine had some sarcastic slant starting with "However have we managed to fight vandalism for the last half-decade without a bunch of high school students to instruct us on how to do it correctly???" I did want to point out that I wasn't encouraging them to continue templating anyone that looks even vaguely like they might want to revert vandalism, but rather suggesting that they do a narrowly targeted approach toward leaving a helpful note to those that appear to need help with that (which is, in my mind, very few people). But as TenOfAllTrades once pointed out, CVUA seems to thrive on taking something that is very easy and pretending it's something hard. About twenty thousand vandalism reverts worth of experience tells me that anyone who requires extensive coaching to revert vandalism probably shouldn't be doing it to begin with. Trusilver 08:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
I have taken the liberty of making an unblock where you were waiting for an answer. I have given my reason here. If you object, then I apologise in advance of receiving your reprimand. I thought it better to get the matter settled rather than leaving it pending, for several reasons. JamesBWatson ( talk) 13:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Well the user has now explicitly accepted your terms anyway. JamesBWatson ( talk) 19:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
User:Miroslav303 has asked on my talk page that the article Hotspot Shield (which I apparently flagged for speedy and which you deleted) be userfied. I'm not an administrator, so I cannot do that; I presume you could? -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 23:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Would you be able to translate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_de_Ruiter. Thank you. Planktonium ( talk) 23:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I meant into German. Planktonium ( talk) 00:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm inclined to think that this editor, who's first and only edit is to open up an SPI case is a sockpuppet himself. --v/r Electric Catfish ( talk) 01:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Something happened to this at RFPC. GB fan 01:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Would you care to explain yourself? What does this mean? -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 07:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung
Re your comments
1) I have eliminated any links to networking sites and apparent disallowed sources per your request such as “bare citations”. Any major claims not substantiated by independent citation have been removed. Most textual links are to internal wiki sites that do not contain significant issues. All multiple citations for the same link have been removed.
2) Re the issue of WP:bio which states that “For Wikipedia:Notability (people), the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" – that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded”
The subject of this page meets all of those criteria. The page is the only one to my knowledge dedicated to Mr. Layton and is not as you have suggested part of a “Link Farm” - if I understand your meaning. Mr. Layton has consistently avoided publicity over the years and others have written about him in sometimes inaccurate and occasionally in a libelous manner – particularly in the Middle East. He is known to virtually tens of thousands of people worldwide for many different things he has done by people who find his life of “interest” and “significance” for one reason or another. This PAGE is merely a statement for the record of who he is and what he has done. Assertion of notability…
A) He is a published author of books recognized by other prominent authors who themselves have wiki pages or who have been NY Times best sellers (see “published works). His books have been recognized by a US Senator and Lt. Governor as substantially contributing to the effort to achieve democracy in Kurdistan of Iraq
B) He has testified before the US Senate on the issues of Genocide against the Kurds as an expert on the subject along with other notables (1 of 5 chosen for hearings for the Senate Foreign relations Committee hearings and he is listed in Library of Congress as such
C) He has been country director for one of the largest political and health care projects ever run by the US State Department in Kurdistan of Iraq (HCP)
D) He has consulted for the Kurdish government and represented them in Washington DC
E) He has directed a large British/Kurdish public/private development partnership in Kurdistan half owned by the Kurdish Government under the auspices of the Prime Minister Nichervan Barzani
F) He is recognized as a key promoter of religious freedom in Kurdistan of Iraq and has been referenced in numerous articles and magazines worldwide
G) He is an associate of The Next Century Foundation – a renowned conflict resolution entity in London
H) He served on the faculty of The University of the Presidents (YPO) an organization comprised of some of the top CEOs in the world
… To name a few of his accomplishments and pursuits that makes him a person of interest to potential Wikipedia readers. I have researched many Wiki sites and believe Mr. Layton certainly qualifies as a person of “significance and interest” compared with many others who have been included in Wikipedia
3) As for the issue of style – Apart from the issue of citation format I am not sure what you mean as I have researched a number of bio sites that seem to have the same style and in fact copied the style from another wiki site to insure the style was consistent with others in Wikipedia. However if style is an issue and I can understand what the issues are clearly I will make any necessary corrections.
Thanks again for your input and I hope this serves to resolve the issues you have raised.
Randaximus ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
I just tidied this page a bit, added a reference etc., as a base point, even though I feel the subject's notability is at best borderline. Having done that, I was about to move it to a properly-named page with capitalised surname, when I found it is protected. So presumably there is a past here that I was unaware of? Anyway, if that is so, perhaps it is best to take this to a more permanent resolution one way or another by titling it properly and then going via AfD? AllyD ( talk) 12:53, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Here you have left the latest of the series of notices you've been leaving on my talk page, telling me to read WP:ORG. No issues with that, you're right. I could have chosen to csd or prod it. However, as it happens, that simply skipped my mind.
I would appreciate if you didn't use such a formal tone since you tag me frequently and I also appreciate your efforts to bring me to terms with the procedure. I happen to like your altruistic notices, but I would like it more if you interact with me in congenial, informal terms as opposed to very rigid-seeming, formal notices. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 15:03, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
However, if you sincerely want to help me then first and foremost change your stern and officious tone. You're not anybody's boss here (certainly not mine), some politeness is looked forward to from a senior editor and especially from an administrator. I don't wish to precipitate wisdom-ridden disquisitions on you, but with greater power comes heavier responsibility. If you can accomplish these two then teaching me anything might not seem such an arduous task. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 07:17, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
I got the hang of BLPPROD (clear and simple), I think, same way I will get the hang of other rationales for deletion. Don't worry. Right now you're kind of putting unwarranted pressure on me which is not helping, at all rather I am freaking out. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 12:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
"If giving you polite advice is to be construed as pressure" - it's not construed, it is pressure in shape of polite and reasonable warning (which I don't dislike per se). I just want you to be clear and informal (more congenial). Something like "you could have done this next time keep this in mind.", preferably with a {{ smiley}} . Am I asking too much? Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 12:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Is the nomination of Star Island, Ontario, alright? Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 13:03, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
The essence of patrolling pages is accuracy not speed, and remember, you're not alone out there, others are patrolling too, so the very best advice is if you don't know what to do, leave it and move on to another page. Go for the low hanging fruit first and patrol the harder ones when you have gained more confidence with the tools. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:35, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Dear sir,
Supriya maskey is the recent pageant holder and i have tagged references. You can check out the references on news and websites. I confirm that the description are legitimate and true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Binod.hyoju ( talk • contribs) 05:14, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks James for all your dedication to go through out the article Supriya Maskey. Thats good information to what I have learnt. Please recheck the references that i have coded for reliable source as the news here in nepal is popping out In every papers and websites. You should go to Nepalese council website and also littleworld website to see the reference it it is reliable information or not. I would be happy if you assist me to help me how to ref the sources. Lets do it. Binod Hyoju 02:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC) --Binod Hyoju 02:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung. Looks like we've got a sock-drawer here. I can see who created Jordan Maron but not see who started the 3 x deleted CaptainSparklez. Could you possibly let me know? Thank you!-- Shirt58 ( talk) 09:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 09:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings Kudpung,
The RFA at
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Σ, of which you were co-nominator, has identified a number of community concerns which may rise above the usual level of past unsatisfactory interactions, conflicts and personal dislikes which are typical of RFA in its current format. In particular there are concerns relating to off-wiki vandalism and on-wiki disruption of which you were presumably unaware at the time of identifying Sigma as a suitable Admin. candidate.
As prominent and widely respected Administrators your endorsement of RF candidates is highly influential, as can be seen from several of the supporting !votes. Therefore, in view of the level of concern relating to the past activities of the candidate, it is sufficiently important to ask you to consider whether you wish to comment on whether the candidate still has the confidence indicated in your nomination statement. There is a section on the RFA Talk Page.
Rgds,
Leaky
Caldron 11:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hestiaea ( talk) 13:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Responded at User talk:JamesBWatson#Supriya Maskey. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung, thank you for addressing the page I created about Gordon Neufeld, I updated it and wrote the explanation why I think it should stay. Hope everything is right now. Please let me know if I can do more to make it valid. Irenru — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irenru ( talk • contribs) 15:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you jamesBwatson and Kudpung I have studied your points on editing and will apply for next to come. Thanks for assisting me. I was unaware of references duplication and now i think everything is on the track. I have understood how to code the references. I apologize for the mistakes I did unintentionally.I am now aware of the use of reference properly. I have to research throughly. Getting back to study wiki rules... You guys are great. Thanks once again for showing the dedication to assisting me... --Binod Hyoju 13:14, 8 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Binod.hyoju (
talk •
contribs)
Hi friend. You might give Sigma a nudge that this would be a good time to demonstrate maturity with a voluntary withdrawal. Best regards, —Tim //// Carrite ( talk) 04:01, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Kurtis ( talk) 07:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung. I was wondering what you thought had changed based on this recent RfA? Before running back to solutions such as minimum requirements or spending another 6-8 months trying to reform RfA, I think it would be better to actually discuss what went wrong (if anything) at the RfA. Perhaps let the dust settle and have some rational, focussed discussion at WT:RfA. Remember, people are allowed to oppose candidates, for whatever reason they wish - even if we feel the candidate is a good one, consensus may not be with us. WormTT( talk) 09:38, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
I suspect your antipathy towards me stems from our first interaction last December when you responded to a civil question with an unnecessarily combative response for which you subsequently sort of recognised that your attitude was inappropriate. Subsequently I have ridiculed some preposterous attempts at RFA reform (which I am entitled to do) which has obviously antagonised you further, culminating in you referring me to WP:AN yesterday. Your fellow nominators were not in the least put out by my approach but you were happy to see me suffer bad faith hazing in which you freely participated. Whatever the reason for your approach, I think you are over-assertive and on occasion aggressive without justification and on that basis it is likely that we will rarely see eye to eye. Where I do agree with you I will say so. As you welcome forthright comments that is what I've given you. Here are more detailed responses to your comments. No obligation to reply, we will not persuade one another.
I reverted you here thinking you mistakenly rolled back his edit. If it was intentional, please let me know.— cyberpower ChatOnline 14:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Two following two things are vexing me:
I leave it entirely up to you. I will not get involved in it any further. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 15:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
@Voceditenore
I somewhat don't understand. The deleted sources are:
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link){{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link){{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link){{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link){{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)As you can see there are some sources claiming to be operated by state departments (*.gov). But you focus on only "ripoffreport.com", why? Besides, there is a reason why I said, I am iffy about that accusation. I honestly don't understand why is it that you say they are all "blogs". Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 08:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
"The only thing that can be reliably sourced is that Tassone claims that he has a moving business and also has a comedy act. (refs 1 and 2)"— Would you like to improve the article by re-editing the deleted-section "criticism" then? I am asking you because I am not equipped with the knowledge or the necessary experience that you have.
"we shouldn't clog up Kudpung's page with this"
— you're probably right. Cheers, nice talking
Mr T
(Talk?)
(New thread?) 13:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I recently tagged Lookout Farm Crestview Hills, KY, but kept it "unreviewed", I am uncertain whether or not it falls in the category of "Blatant promotion" (G11). I didn't nominate it because once I was told that settlements tend to be notable. Please take a look if you can. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 07:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
— ΛΧΣ 21™ 23:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
I am almost ready for bed. Just after 12:00am here in California. I am going to have a bite to eat and then go to bed for the evening (took me a while to re-adjust my sleep pattern after a really long night a while back at DR/N) I will return tomorrow to add a few ideas I have to the link you provided.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 07:16, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
My thoughts are here [ http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=516792853&oldid=516791990. I think something along those lines would begin to improve matters. I have no idea if such has previously been considered and dismissed. With your long experience at RFA reform you will know best. If you see any merit in such then it will need the likes of you to advocate it, not me. If they are not worthy of consideration then all I can do is watch from the sidelines. rgds. Leaky Caldron n
Between bludgeoning and quoting me out of context, I'm working if an RfA topic ban is needed at WP:AN. For me, it isn't about the candidate, whom I don't have any feelings for one way or the other, but I have worked very hard to return some normality to RfA since my own, and if we start condoning this kind of disruptive behavior, we can expect more of it. I had contacted an Arb, who did nothing, and complained in a number of forums, to no result, so I"m rather disappointed in the community response in this. I had voted so felt I couldn't be as aggressive as the situation warranted. I don't want to see this kind of behavior from anyone at RfA, and only by the act having consequences that prevent future acts can we guarantee this. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 11:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I got a speed deletion in my userspace, can you please have a look? User:RexRowan/Eric_Grimson Thanks! -- RexRowan Talk 13:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, Could you have a look at the protection you applied at Rangers F.C, as you only put semi on for a day, whereas I think you meant it indef (which it probably should have IMHO). Could you drop a note on the article talk page as there's a request there and I mentioned I'd raise it with you. Thanks. Ged UK 12:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
i have just found ou t that user Electriccatfish2 has been using you for his sock puppet account
user: moshecarroll123
Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moshecarroll123 ( talk • contribs) 17:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) No comment, Beeblebrox. Theo polisme 03:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you guys for all of your help. It's quite uncomfortable to be trolled around the site by someone who makes outrageous claims about you. Thankfully, User: Electriccatfish3 was indeffed a few minutes after he created an attack page about me. I guess that's what you get when you do NPP and vandal-fighting. Anyways, thanks for all of your help. --v/r Electric Catfish ( talk) 23:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
You have done a great deal of work. I need to remember that when posting in order not to allow others to use me to bring you down. I don't wish to begin suggesting things that will just be brushed off by others in an attempt to make me out as some freak or someone that can be walked over. At the same time, while I have the ability to fight in a similar manner (trust me.....I can be a far bigger ass than others) it won't improve the project. I need to step back and regroup before I submitt any ideas. This is a serious issue. One that I feel needs to be addressed in the best possible manner. Give me some time and i hope to post some ideas. If not then I probably decided it was not worth being personaly destroyed over.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 05:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know about this over at New Editor Retention. I had no idea this was an actual initiative. After reading through the proposal and bugzilla comments on it, I am also sorely disappointed WMF was not on-board with it and am frustrated by some of their behavior in the comments. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:34, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Is there a reason why I can be denied this for so long, for such a mistake, and still be possibly denied after the next three months. I know there are users who aren't perfect with most of their edits, however, clearly I try to at least halt the vandals on my talk page and and further contributions, I tend to at least help in some reviews, if only possible denial I may find this denying my right to use the review and send a complaint to Wikipedia itself.
All I'm saying is I trying to use this review to suggest a more suitable table for articles in Wikipedia and not to show off in any form, I understand the policies from Wikipedia:Reviewing, request, and forms of vandalism policies I am stilling willing to learn the review, once again, I am willing to build articles by using the review and other methods to help new articles -- GoShow (............................) 00:54, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
I have a question: Would I be allowed to suggest that someone else be given rollback at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback, or is that a thing where only the user himself or herself may request it? Automatic Strikeout 02:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
By pure coincidence, I just happened on this which appears to illustrate Drmies' point perfectly. Ironically, the one complaining here also fits squarely into that category. Broadly, I come across these problems every day at PERM, AfC, AfD, RPP, AiV, NPP, etc., and it's one of the reasons, for example, which also led the CVUA being remodeled. The catalyst for the current arbcom case was also an enthusiastic but unwise attempt at pre-emptive clerking. I tried within seconds to nip it in the bud, but it was too late. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, I saw that you issued a 6 month school block for IP 209.250.173.254, resolving to Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB), Burlington, ON. I have found them to vandalise using multiple IPs at the same time recently. Therefore, for the school block to become effective, you might also need to block 209.250.172.102, 209.250.172.114 and 209.250.173.99 (those were the three other "interacting" IP addresses, when I stumbled upon them), but there might be more. Greetings. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 10:08, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but did you intend to remove my advice to the user after others had referenced it? If not I would like it restored. I'm brushing up on the various mop activities prior to a run for the tool. Hasteur ( talk) 19:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung, you know more about this stuff than I do--I noticed you denied some user rights on User talk:GoShow; right after your message I commented on their incorrect use of STiki (I'm not exactly sure what that is) to claim vandalism/test edits. I have some other issues with this editor (websites claimed to be RS on astrology articles), but I though you might like to know. Ah, I see now that they have rollback--if it were up to me I'd pull it, but I would appreciate your second opinion. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 16:29, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
You posted a blocked template on this IP's talk page, but they actually don't appear to still be blocked. I'm not sure if you're currently around to look at this, but if not, maybe one of your talk page stalkers can take care of it. Automatic Strikeout 05:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I know you're active at PERM, and was wondering if you noticed the fairly long backlog at WP:PERM/RV. Regards, TRLIJC19 ( talk • contribs) 22:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
— ΛΧΣ 21™ 01:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung. So, I've received three different emails (generally from people who were around during the start of WP:CVUA) suggesting that I put in an RFA. While I would find The Tools™ useful in what I do, I just don't think I'm ready at all (though, I have some serious self-worth issues that I'm working to fix). As someone who has generally been around the same places, but that I don't feel like I have a close, personal relationship with, I'm wondering if you'd be willing to look through my contributions and assess my chances at RFA. I think I can be useful, but I don't want "another premature CVUA RFA", as it were. If you have time, I'd really appreciate a 100% honest and open review of my chances at RFA. Cheers! Achowat ( talk) 18:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to participate in my RfA. I hope that I will be able to improve based on the feedback I received and become a better editor. Automatic Strikeout 02:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I desperately need confirmed status on my account. I cannot wait 4 days for autoconfirmation. I am being denied on the basis that my article isn't finished yet. I do not understand this. Can you please explain to me what the reasoning is behind such a rule? I am new to wikipedia, and I understand that there are rules, but why a rule that insists that I complete the text portion of an article before I can upload images? Please see: Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Confirmed#User:C_Coligniero Why can't I do the article one portion at a time? -- C Coligniero ( talk) 02:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey all :).
We're (very shortly) closing down this development cycle for Page Curation. It's genuinely been a pleasure to talk with you all and build software that is so close to my own heart, and also so effective. The current backlog is 9 days, and I've never seen it that low before.
However! Closing up shop does not mean not making any improvements. First-off, this is your last chance to give us a poke about unresolved bugs or report new ones on the talkpage. If something's going wrong, we want to know about it :). Second, we'll hopefully be taking another pass over the software next year. If you've got ideas for features Page Curation doesn't currently have, stick them here.
Again, it's been an honour. Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 12:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
สวัสดี (Sawadee) and ostentatiously appreciated for working well with registered and IP accounts. -- GoShow (............................) 16:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
Hello,
I am wondering why you deleted the AMRAP Nutrition page.
Please tell me how it appeared to be promotional / advertising as I trust your opinion and respect your concern for keeping garbage out of Wikipedia. However this company is doing good things and I am one of many that think we should support them.
Kindly review their Facebook page ( https://www.facebook.com/AMRAPnutrition ) and please let me know your final thoughts as I will respect and support them.
Thank you and have a nice day!
Hey Kudpung, I assume you noted my user page as unreadable for one of two reasons: 1) the colours hurt your eyes, or 2) it doesn't render properly in your browser. I wanted to note that I have no emotional attachment to any aspect of it, but also that there is a thought process here.
As far as the colours go, I understand that they are not the standard on Wikipedia, but they exist in that form for a reason. If you spend any time using a command line or text-based operating system, you know that such software is almost always distributed with black backgrounds and non-white text. This is because people who spend excessive amounts of time looking at text on computer screens usually find (if they have given it a good shot) that such a colour scheme tends to keep the eyes from getting tired. If you note the image to the right, that is what my user page looks like in a text-based environment. I did not choose those colours, that is how the software is distributed. I would be happy to change the colours, I just chose those because it is what I am used to seeing elsewhere. I have never had anyone come to me (in person or on Wikipedia) to say that they could not read my user page, but that does not mean there aren't people out there who can't (triple negative!).
With respect to rendering, I do look at my user page in modern and ancient browsers, and have only seen it not render properly with software that can't render the rest of Wikipedia anyway. Do you have a problem seeing it?
In short, I would change it without strife if someone could provide a credible reason for it. I would appreciate your thoughts. hajat vrc @ 07:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Done Any thoughts? hajat vrc @ 10:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Kudpung, maybe you can judge whether Peasant revolution in Thailand is a viable article--I have my doubts. The user has a specific interest in this field which you can see at Talk:Peasant's revolution. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 17:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Kudpung! It's a been a while since we talked, but I just had a question about WP:NPP that I thought you'd be more than fit to answer. In instances like this, I end up having an edit conflict/such with one of the copyright bots -- which I am unaware of until after saving the page, because of the way Twinkle processes CSD tagging. My question for you is: Is my tagging completely redundant (and should be reverted, trouted, and thrown into a large cage), or... not? Thanks, Theo polisme 13:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung,
Thank you for your comments in response to my question about the article on Jason Shulman. I'm new to Wiki, so your comments were very helpful.
I wondered if I could check something with you...
I had believed that the following establishes Rev Shulman’s notability:
I'd be grateful for any thoughts you could offer on how I could build my case based on these facts...?
Thank you once again for taking the time to write and give me feedback.
Best wishes, Sharadha ( Sharadha Bain ( talk) 16:50, 20 October 2012 (UTC))
Hi Kudpung, some users(most probably sock puppets) keep deleting my message for in NYU-Poly's talk page.
Thanks-- Magini ( talk) 21:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, Thank you once again for this very helpful feedback. May I run a quick question by you: Two well-known books about healing have dedicated an entire chapter each to Shulman and his teachings. The authors had no personal connection to him, so they are independent sources. Further: comments/blurbs for his books came from highly respected folk - Stephen Covey, Lama Surya Das, Carolyn Myss etc. Would these help in establishing notability? Thank you once again for your time and kind assistance. Sharadha ( Sharadha Bain ( talk) 12:11, 21 October 2012 (UTC))
... [1] JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung, Thank you for pointing me to the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. I will check there. You've been very kind indeed. Thank you for all the feedback and guidance. Sharadha ( Sharadha Bain ( talk) 23:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC))
Go Phightins ! 03:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Give the child a slap. -- Biker Biker ( talk) 18:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
What exactly is the point of trying to engage him on his talk page when he wouldn't listen to anyone else and has already made it clear he won't listen to me? But if you insist, next time I will. Automatic Strikeout 19:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Kudpung, I am completely aware that patrolling from the NPP backlog is what's recommended, and I try to. However in this case I was looking at "new editors contribs" under recent changes. I saw a mistake, fixed it, and when Fjozk came to my talk page I politely apologized, I explained how to resolve an edit conflict, I thanked him for his contributions, and asked him to come by if he had further questions. I assumed good faith. It was an honest mistake, one that I now am more careful about, and I just don't see why this has gotten so overblown. It was a single apostrophe. If people can get this riled up about an apostrophe, then I give up. Go Phightins ! 20:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
( edit conflict)( edit conflict) Wow, tryin' to get a word in edgways on my own tp ;) Well 'ere it is: :I agree entirely that this whole thing has been blown up out of proportion. See the conversation above with AutomaticStrikeout. The message going round the site at the moment is that the same signatures keep appearing on messages at ANI whether as plaintiffs or as uninvolved commentators. The only names that should be seen there with any regularity are those of the admins - and I'm sure you can figure out why that is. As for NPP, yes, it is indeed recommended to work from the back of the queue, but paradoxically those articles are the hardest to patrol because they are the ones that the newbs and kids have left after going for the low hanging fruit at the front of the queue. I would prefer to see the less experienced patrollers doing just that: leaving the tough pages for the experts to deal with. Almost everyone agrees that the real priority is at the front of the queue because that's where the hoax, attack, vandal, and copyvio pages are easily identified, and very quickly deleted. Fjozk made some very valid points in his posts at WT:NPP - do check out the entire thread because he's got the picture perfectly, it's just a shame he has a caustic way of commenting. As regards to incivility, if Arbcom won't block serial offenders, how do you expect us mere admins to risk our reputations (and perhaps our tools) for blocking anyone for something less? The best way to handle people like that is to ignore them. It usually works. Once you know your stuff really well at NPP, you can help us patrol the patrollers and correct the mess they make. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 21:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't take it upon myself to fix the world very often, but this article is seriously harmful. It needs to be completely scrapped and re-written or deleted altogether. I am very willing to work with somebody to re-write this article. If nobody else will, I would like to re-write the article myself. I will make it objective, have appropriate information, have good sources, etc (obviously different from the message I put on it). Please help me with this. I will speak to whoever I need to and put in as many complaints directly to Jimmy Wales's inbox as it takes if I have to (obviously a joke).
I am sorry if this comes off arrogant or generally crazy, but this article is not just a poor article - it is a problem. It is harmful for it to be visible to the public, and it is not appropriate for the purposes of wikipedia.
I appreciate whatever help you can give me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.0.32.44 ( talk) 02:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
One's coming your way. Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 09:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung,
I just received notice about the deletion of the page I made. I saw your notes, "subject not important" to put in an encyclopedia.
My ambition to start this page is well Im an American student studying my masters in Norway at BI Norwegian Business School.
The Alumni Association here enables students to meet with past alumni, to speak about jobs, mentoring, networking things like that.
I did my undergrad in the US, and the day I graduated I received an email from the alumni department at my school asking for donations..
WHY i made this page is, well i think this is one hell of a vision, instead of asking for money, they operate solely on funding from school, to benefit their former and current students. The closeness of the university to its former students is fantastic, their cooperation and everything is like nothing i have seen before, because it is a program that reaches out rather, asks for funding.
I know alumni isnt the hottest of topics. But there is a page for Texas Tech Alumni Association, so i though that mine would be applicable and even more relevant.
Please, could you assist me with recommendations, or help me get this posted.
Thank you very much
Kevin Cassidy — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinCassidy16 ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, I used {{ Copyvio-revdel}} but I'm not sure if there are any admins who watch the category it places it's tranclusions into, which is Category:Requested RD1 redactions. So since you are quite active I thought I'd let you know just in case. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 12:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Please advise why? WillyDonker ( talk) 13:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/business/news/9702505.Acquisition_will_help_Canford_expand/
“A HIGH-TECH company which supplies equipment that enabled billions to watch the Royal Wedding live is set to expand after increasing exports by 38 per cent.”
http://www.canford.co.uk/News/428_Royal-wedding-audio-and-video-routed-through-Canford-panels Canford are also connected to G20 and the Olympics http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/business/news/4272201.Cable_firm_makes_connections_at_G20/ Canford are global Brittan France Germany and Dubai http://www.durhamtimes.co.uk/archive/2012/02/15/Business%3A+News/9532561.Electronics_firm_Canford_opens_Dubai_office/ BVE norths review on canford audio plc http://www.bvenorth.co.uk/Show_Exhdetails1.aspx?exhid=exhiReg2&id=det
Canford own NEAL recordings who supply Recorders to worldwide police and benefit agencies and immigration services (Recorders always seen on tv) As you can see here canford also supply the military. http://www.armedforces.co.uk/companies/raq3f66e75f6be0d £6m liabilities http://companycheck.co.uk/company/01385727
As you can see canford is a company with another UK site at the far end of the country, and with offices in France Dubai and Germany. If these sources are not enough then i am happy to admit defeat.
Thanks WillyDonker ( talk) 14:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Top class Admin. Listens to all points fairly even from a wiki newbie like me. Provides a informative and enjoyable start to wiki-ing. I think Im hooked already. Thank you! WillyDonker ( talk) 14:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you Willy! You know, I've got a load or barnstars and stuff, but that's the nicest message I've had in my 6 years here. Made an old man's day! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 15:08, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, there have been four warnings on this user's page since last month when we attempted an ANI report. Is there anything we can do at this point? RFC/U? Elizium23 ( talk) 18:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belton Standpipe (Belton, South Carolina), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belton ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
I think, this article needs a more experienced editor than me. I proded it, at first. Check the history but the creator keeps removing my other tags (e.g. {{ stub}}, {{ uncategorised}}, etc). Best Regards, Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 13:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Kudpung.Actually i am bit confused with this. Am i granted permission or declined ? Thank You 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 18:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
I am kinda at a loss, I've re-read the documentation here Template:Non-administrator observation as you suggested and I don't see what that documentation has anything to do with the amount of edits made. You made another comment a while back here which is more confusing, which comment do stand behind ? this one or this one. An editor pinged me in IRC and was upset because they thought they got me in trouble after seeing your comment (today) as they were the one that pointed me to Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Account creator#User:Titodutta, I assured them they had nothing to do with your comment. After thinking about this awhile your comment might have been placed as "a truly friendly reminder" but frankly I think it's caused more problems than it apparently meant to save. WP:PERM are project pages not owned by anyone, I don't see how my 600+ edits there has anything to do with you or WP:PERM. Please point me to some solid policy to the contrary and we can continue this discussion, if not you please cease and desist. Cheers. Mlpearc ( powwow) 02:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I missed this whole Wikipedia community so so much! I was seriously taking decisions to retire from Wikipedia, but my heart stopped me from doing so. How are you, anyways? @ Dipankan Upgraded! Tag me! 07:31, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
Kudpung, thanks for the advice, I was bit confused about the whole, I just want it to contribute what ever I can, so thanks for the cool reminder,
cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdirisak ( talk • contribs) 16:40, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Caring Hands Learning Centers - you tagged it, I deleted it. Please see my reply to an objector. Peridon ( talk) 16:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
WikiPuppies bark dig 01:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Since you seem to be responding to queries in his stead, I was wondering if you could help me with something. Someone moved " A Picture is Worth a 1,000 Bucks" to " A Picture is Worth a Thousand Bucks". The user likely meant well, but the former is the episode's correct title. I tried to fix it myself, and not surprisingly, screwed it up even more. If you could move it back I would appreciate it. Thanks. Joefromrandb ( talk) 08:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page Waterloo Road School (Greenford) when it was a reliable page about a fictional school set in Greenford west london — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burrs002 ( talk • contribs) 14:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
and dealing with my whinging and whining about the state of affairs at Talk:Depictions of nudity. It seems so simple when ....... someone else does it. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 15:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Why did you username-block this one? There is gross self-promotion going on and I was about to prepare a note for COI/N and to ask MichaelQSchmidt ( talk) whether any of these films were notable; Jordanalan may end up blocked for advertising (though, as we don't tell new users what WP is not for, it would be only fair to warn him first), but I don't see a problem with him using his own name. There was an earlier account Jordanalan00 ( talk) but that has not edited since February so there isn't really a sock problem.
To illustrate the degree of self-promotion, I reverted here edits to one of his film articles which altered sourced statements that the film "was panned by the critics" and was "a box-office flop" to say, without sources, that it "garnered rave reviews" and "went on to unprecedented success"!
Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 18:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung. Can you please review my recent patrolling actions and tell me if I am doing good there. If that area is clean I will focus on working on patrolling of new pages. Thanking you, Dipankan001. @ Dipankan Upgraded! Tag me! 06:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung! I would like to soon create articles Osoyoos Times and Oliver Chronicle, but am afraid it wouldn't pass WP:GNG. They are city newspapers, and i find some newpaper articles on the Osoyoos Times, including one by CBC News. May I ask for your input? Thanks so much, TBr and ley 00:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thanks! Azylber ( talk) 03:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Armbrust The Homonculus 09:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Oh come now, I wasn't necessarily referring to you. Unless, you're admitting that you are a among "those that try to scare away content editors", in which case you should resign immediately. -- Scorpion 0422 19:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk)
Hi there. I saw that you removed the CSD tag I added to this article with the edit summary "Rm db-nocontext to replace with correct CSD criteria". I've been doing some NPP the past few days, and have found a handful of articles in other languages. Is there a CSD tag for foreign language articles that are not on other wikis, or a different procedure for dealing with them? I'd rather not mistag any more articles if I can avoid it. Thanks. — Torchiest talk edits 22:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up, and sorry about the oversight. I've reinstated the initial BLPPROD. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 05:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I've filled in the questionnaire on your mentoring page. Alanl ( talk) 11:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I am jaykissan.i have noticed you have deleted a page archworlds.com. but the page have its important as its related to new company established in New Delhi,India on 2012. You can give a direction to correct it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaykissan ( talk • contribs) 13:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Please unlock Begin Again as posting correct information is not what you claimed here: Protected Begin Again (Taylor Swift song): Edit warring / Content dispute ([edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 12:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 12:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC) it is unfair of you and I will be reporting you for this as well that I have given 9 sources that contradict the information posted on the page and I AM THE ONE edit warring/content disputing, there is none just 2 editors who do not want to realize that they were proven wrong. That is not fair to me and you had no right to do that. Please see the pages talk page to see my 9 sources.
You are the second person to insult me and the third that will not listen and now all of Wikipedia will pay for it thank you you have given me some great stuff to help shut this fake encyclopedia down. Oh and if you block me for this so you know that I was given legal advice to change my IP address. Wikipedia does tons of illegal stuff and has given more evidence to my case to get it shut down. Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.18.72 ( talk) 15:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Please excuse my bluntness but I have criticised your nomination of this article for deletion at the AFD and ARS. Your comments would be appreciated as it may be that I have missed some aspect of your thinking or am just being too harsh. But the matter currently seems to be symptomatic of a systemic failure; the process just isn't working as it is supposed to and so we need to rethink it. I know that you have similar views about RfA but the basic process of article improvement is even more fundamental and, if you don't get this, then who will? Warden ( talk) 23:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Could you revdelete from this revision to this revision? For some reason my revdel button isn't working. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung, can you protect a few pages in my userspace for me please? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Dori ☾ Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 23:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for being infinitely more eloquent and patient in your explanations to them than I am able to be. I deleted four different attempts at explaining what you managed to do much more articulately... mostly because all of mine had some sarcastic slant starting with "However have we managed to fight vandalism for the last half-decade without a bunch of high school students to instruct us on how to do it correctly???" I did want to point out that I wasn't encouraging them to continue templating anyone that looks even vaguely like they might want to revert vandalism, but rather suggesting that they do a narrowly targeted approach toward leaving a helpful note to those that appear to need help with that (which is, in my mind, very few people). But as TenOfAllTrades once pointed out, CVUA seems to thrive on taking something that is very easy and pretending it's something hard. About twenty thousand vandalism reverts worth of experience tells me that anyone who requires extensive coaching to revert vandalism probably shouldn't be doing it to begin with. Trusilver 08:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
I have taken the liberty of making an unblock where you were waiting for an answer. I have given my reason here. If you object, then I apologise in advance of receiving your reprimand. I thought it better to get the matter settled rather than leaving it pending, for several reasons. JamesBWatson ( talk) 13:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Well the user has now explicitly accepted your terms anyway. JamesBWatson ( talk) 19:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
User:Miroslav303 has asked on my talk page that the article Hotspot Shield (which I apparently flagged for speedy and which you deleted) be userfied. I'm not an administrator, so I cannot do that; I presume you could? -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 23:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Would you be able to translate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_de_Ruiter. Thank you. Planktonium ( talk) 23:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I meant into German. Planktonium ( talk) 00:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm inclined to think that this editor, who's first and only edit is to open up an SPI case is a sockpuppet himself. --v/r Electric Catfish ( talk) 01:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Something happened to this at RFPC. GB fan 01:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Would you care to explain yourself? What does this mean? -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 07:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung
Re your comments
1) I have eliminated any links to networking sites and apparent disallowed sources per your request such as “bare citations”. Any major claims not substantiated by independent citation have been removed. Most textual links are to internal wiki sites that do not contain significant issues. All multiple citations for the same link have been removed.
2) Re the issue of WP:bio which states that “For Wikipedia:Notability (people), the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" – that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded”
The subject of this page meets all of those criteria. The page is the only one to my knowledge dedicated to Mr. Layton and is not as you have suggested part of a “Link Farm” - if I understand your meaning. Mr. Layton has consistently avoided publicity over the years and others have written about him in sometimes inaccurate and occasionally in a libelous manner – particularly in the Middle East. He is known to virtually tens of thousands of people worldwide for many different things he has done by people who find his life of “interest” and “significance” for one reason or another. This PAGE is merely a statement for the record of who he is and what he has done. Assertion of notability…
A) He is a published author of books recognized by other prominent authors who themselves have wiki pages or who have been NY Times best sellers (see “published works). His books have been recognized by a US Senator and Lt. Governor as substantially contributing to the effort to achieve democracy in Kurdistan of Iraq
B) He has testified before the US Senate on the issues of Genocide against the Kurds as an expert on the subject along with other notables (1 of 5 chosen for hearings for the Senate Foreign relations Committee hearings and he is listed in Library of Congress as such
C) He has been country director for one of the largest political and health care projects ever run by the US State Department in Kurdistan of Iraq (HCP)
D) He has consulted for the Kurdish government and represented them in Washington DC
E) He has directed a large British/Kurdish public/private development partnership in Kurdistan half owned by the Kurdish Government under the auspices of the Prime Minister Nichervan Barzani
F) He is recognized as a key promoter of religious freedom in Kurdistan of Iraq and has been referenced in numerous articles and magazines worldwide
G) He is an associate of The Next Century Foundation – a renowned conflict resolution entity in London
H) He served on the faculty of The University of the Presidents (YPO) an organization comprised of some of the top CEOs in the world
… To name a few of his accomplishments and pursuits that makes him a person of interest to potential Wikipedia readers. I have researched many Wiki sites and believe Mr. Layton certainly qualifies as a person of “significance and interest” compared with many others who have been included in Wikipedia
3) As for the issue of style – Apart from the issue of citation format I am not sure what you mean as I have researched a number of bio sites that seem to have the same style and in fact copied the style from another wiki site to insure the style was consistent with others in Wikipedia. However if style is an issue and I can understand what the issues are clearly I will make any necessary corrections.
Thanks again for your input and I hope this serves to resolve the issues you have raised.
Randaximus ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
I just tidied this page a bit, added a reference etc., as a base point, even though I feel the subject's notability is at best borderline. Having done that, I was about to move it to a properly-named page with capitalised surname, when I found it is protected. So presumably there is a past here that I was unaware of? Anyway, if that is so, perhaps it is best to take this to a more permanent resolution one way or another by titling it properly and then going via AfD? AllyD ( talk) 12:53, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Here you have left the latest of the series of notices you've been leaving on my talk page, telling me to read WP:ORG. No issues with that, you're right. I could have chosen to csd or prod it. However, as it happens, that simply skipped my mind.
I would appreciate if you didn't use such a formal tone since you tag me frequently and I also appreciate your efforts to bring me to terms with the procedure. I happen to like your altruistic notices, but I would like it more if you interact with me in congenial, informal terms as opposed to very rigid-seeming, formal notices. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 15:03, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
However, if you sincerely want to help me then first and foremost change your stern and officious tone. You're not anybody's boss here (certainly not mine), some politeness is looked forward to from a senior editor and especially from an administrator. I don't wish to precipitate wisdom-ridden disquisitions on you, but with greater power comes heavier responsibility. If you can accomplish these two then teaching me anything might not seem such an arduous task. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 07:17, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
I got the hang of BLPPROD (clear and simple), I think, same way I will get the hang of other rationales for deletion. Don't worry. Right now you're kind of putting unwarranted pressure on me which is not helping, at all rather I am freaking out. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 12:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
"If giving you polite advice is to be construed as pressure" - it's not construed, it is pressure in shape of polite and reasonable warning (which I don't dislike per se). I just want you to be clear and informal (more congenial). Something like "you could have done this next time keep this in mind.", preferably with a {{ smiley}} . Am I asking too much? Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 12:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Is the nomination of Star Island, Ontario, alright? Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 13:03, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
The essence of patrolling pages is accuracy not speed, and remember, you're not alone out there, others are patrolling too, so the very best advice is if you don't know what to do, leave it and move on to another page. Go for the low hanging fruit first and patrol the harder ones when you have gained more confidence with the tools. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:35, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Dear sir,
Supriya maskey is the recent pageant holder and i have tagged references. You can check out the references on news and websites. I confirm that the description are legitimate and true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Binod.hyoju ( talk • contribs) 05:14, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks James for all your dedication to go through out the article Supriya Maskey. Thats good information to what I have learnt. Please recheck the references that i have coded for reliable source as the news here in nepal is popping out In every papers and websites. You should go to Nepalese council website and also littleworld website to see the reference it it is reliable information or not. I would be happy if you assist me to help me how to ref the sources. Lets do it. Binod Hyoju 02:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC) --Binod Hyoju 02:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung. Looks like we've got a sock-drawer here. I can see who created Jordan Maron but not see who started the 3 x deleted CaptainSparklez. Could you possibly let me know? Thank you!-- Shirt58 ( talk) 09:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 09:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings Kudpung,
The RFA at
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Σ, of which you were co-nominator, has identified a number of community concerns which may rise above the usual level of past unsatisfactory interactions, conflicts and personal dislikes which are typical of RFA in its current format. In particular there are concerns relating to off-wiki vandalism and on-wiki disruption of which you were presumably unaware at the time of identifying Sigma as a suitable Admin. candidate.
As prominent and widely respected Administrators your endorsement of RF candidates is highly influential, as can be seen from several of the supporting !votes. Therefore, in view of the level of concern relating to the past activities of the candidate, it is sufficiently important to ask you to consider whether you wish to comment on whether the candidate still has the confidence indicated in your nomination statement. There is a section on the RFA Talk Page.
Rgds,
Leaky
Caldron 11:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hestiaea ( talk) 13:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Responded at User talk:JamesBWatson#Supriya Maskey. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung, thank you for addressing the page I created about Gordon Neufeld, I updated it and wrote the explanation why I think it should stay. Hope everything is right now. Please let me know if I can do more to make it valid. Irenru — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irenru ( talk • contribs) 15:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you jamesBwatson and Kudpung I have studied your points on editing and will apply for next to come. Thanks for assisting me. I was unaware of references duplication and now i think everything is on the track. I have understood how to code the references. I apologize for the mistakes I did unintentionally.I am now aware of the use of reference properly. I have to research throughly. Getting back to study wiki rules... You guys are great. Thanks once again for showing the dedication to assisting me... --Binod Hyoju 13:14, 8 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Binod.hyoju (
talk •
contribs)
Hi friend. You might give Sigma a nudge that this would be a good time to demonstrate maturity with a voluntary withdrawal. Best regards, —Tim //// Carrite ( talk) 04:01, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Kurtis ( talk) 07:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung. I was wondering what you thought had changed based on this recent RfA? Before running back to solutions such as minimum requirements or spending another 6-8 months trying to reform RfA, I think it would be better to actually discuss what went wrong (if anything) at the RfA. Perhaps let the dust settle and have some rational, focussed discussion at WT:RfA. Remember, people are allowed to oppose candidates, for whatever reason they wish - even if we feel the candidate is a good one, consensus may not be with us. WormTT( talk) 09:38, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
I suspect your antipathy towards me stems from our first interaction last December when you responded to a civil question with an unnecessarily combative response for which you subsequently sort of recognised that your attitude was inappropriate. Subsequently I have ridiculed some preposterous attempts at RFA reform (which I am entitled to do) which has obviously antagonised you further, culminating in you referring me to WP:AN yesterday. Your fellow nominators were not in the least put out by my approach but you were happy to see me suffer bad faith hazing in which you freely participated. Whatever the reason for your approach, I think you are over-assertive and on occasion aggressive without justification and on that basis it is likely that we will rarely see eye to eye. Where I do agree with you I will say so. As you welcome forthright comments that is what I've given you. Here are more detailed responses to your comments. No obligation to reply, we will not persuade one another.
I reverted you here thinking you mistakenly rolled back his edit. If it was intentional, please let me know.— cyberpower ChatOnline 14:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Two following two things are vexing me:
I leave it entirely up to you. I will not get involved in it any further. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 15:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
@Voceditenore
I somewhat don't understand. The deleted sources are:
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link){{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link){{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link){{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link){{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)As you can see there are some sources claiming to be operated by state departments (*.gov). But you focus on only "ripoffreport.com", why? Besides, there is a reason why I said, I am iffy about that accusation. I honestly don't understand why is it that you say they are all "blogs". Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 08:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
"The only thing that can be reliably sourced is that Tassone claims that he has a moving business and also has a comedy act. (refs 1 and 2)"— Would you like to improve the article by re-editing the deleted-section "criticism" then? I am asking you because I am not equipped with the knowledge or the necessary experience that you have.
"we shouldn't clog up Kudpung's page with this"
— you're probably right. Cheers, nice talking
Mr T
(Talk?)
(New thread?) 13:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I recently tagged Lookout Farm Crestview Hills, KY, but kept it "unreviewed", I am uncertain whether or not it falls in the category of "Blatant promotion" (G11). I didn't nominate it because once I was told that settlements tend to be notable. Please take a look if you can. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 07:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
— ΛΧΣ 21™ 23:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
I am almost ready for bed. Just after 12:00am here in California. I am going to have a bite to eat and then go to bed for the evening (took me a while to re-adjust my sleep pattern after a really long night a while back at DR/N) I will return tomorrow to add a few ideas I have to the link you provided.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 07:16, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
My thoughts are here [ http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=516792853&oldid=516791990. I think something along those lines would begin to improve matters. I have no idea if such has previously been considered and dismissed. With your long experience at RFA reform you will know best. If you see any merit in such then it will need the likes of you to advocate it, not me. If they are not worthy of consideration then all I can do is watch from the sidelines. rgds. Leaky Caldron n
Between bludgeoning and quoting me out of context, I'm working if an RfA topic ban is needed at WP:AN. For me, it isn't about the candidate, whom I don't have any feelings for one way or the other, but I have worked very hard to return some normality to RfA since my own, and if we start condoning this kind of disruptive behavior, we can expect more of it. I had contacted an Arb, who did nothing, and complained in a number of forums, to no result, so I"m rather disappointed in the community response in this. I had voted so felt I couldn't be as aggressive as the situation warranted. I don't want to see this kind of behavior from anyone at RfA, and only by the act having consequences that prevent future acts can we guarantee this. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 11:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I got a speed deletion in my userspace, can you please have a look? User:RexRowan/Eric_Grimson Thanks! -- RexRowan Talk 13:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, Could you have a look at the protection you applied at Rangers F.C, as you only put semi on for a day, whereas I think you meant it indef (which it probably should have IMHO). Could you drop a note on the article talk page as there's a request there and I mentioned I'd raise it with you. Thanks. Ged UK 12:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
i have just found ou t that user Electriccatfish2 has been using you for his sock puppet account
user: moshecarroll123
Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moshecarroll123 ( talk • contribs) 17:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) No comment, Beeblebrox. Theo polisme 03:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you guys for all of your help. It's quite uncomfortable to be trolled around the site by someone who makes outrageous claims about you. Thankfully, User: Electriccatfish3 was indeffed a few minutes after he created an attack page about me. I guess that's what you get when you do NPP and vandal-fighting. Anyways, thanks for all of your help. --v/r Electric Catfish ( talk) 23:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
You have done a great deal of work. I need to remember that when posting in order not to allow others to use me to bring you down. I don't wish to begin suggesting things that will just be brushed off by others in an attempt to make me out as some freak or someone that can be walked over. At the same time, while I have the ability to fight in a similar manner (trust me.....I can be a far bigger ass than others) it won't improve the project. I need to step back and regroup before I submitt any ideas. This is a serious issue. One that I feel needs to be addressed in the best possible manner. Give me some time and i hope to post some ideas. If not then I probably decided it was not worth being personaly destroyed over.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 05:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know about this over at New Editor Retention. I had no idea this was an actual initiative. After reading through the proposal and bugzilla comments on it, I am also sorely disappointed WMF was not on-board with it and am frustrated by some of their behavior in the comments. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:34, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Is there a reason why I can be denied this for so long, for such a mistake, and still be possibly denied after the next three months. I know there are users who aren't perfect with most of their edits, however, clearly I try to at least halt the vandals on my talk page and and further contributions, I tend to at least help in some reviews, if only possible denial I may find this denying my right to use the review and send a complaint to Wikipedia itself.
All I'm saying is I trying to use this review to suggest a more suitable table for articles in Wikipedia and not to show off in any form, I understand the policies from Wikipedia:Reviewing, request, and forms of vandalism policies I am stilling willing to learn the review, once again, I am willing to build articles by using the review and other methods to help new articles -- GoShow (............................) 00:54, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
I have a question: Would I be allowed to suggest that someone else be given rollback at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback, or is that a thing where only the user himself or herself may request it? Automatic Strikeout 02:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
By pure coincidence, I just happened on this which appears to illustrate Drmies' point perfectly. Ironically, the one complaining here also fits squarely into that category. Broadly, I come across these problems every day at PERM, AfC, AfD, RPP, AiV, NPP, etc., and it's one of the reasons, for example, which also led the CVUA being remodeled. The catalyst for the current arbcom case was also an enthusiastic but unwise attempt at pre-emptive clerking. I tried within seconds to nip it in the bud, but it was too late. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, I saw that you issued a 6 month school block for IP 209.250.173.254, resolving to Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB), Burlington, ON. I have found them to vandalise using multiple IPs at the same time recently. Therefore, for the school block to become effective, you might also need to block 209.250.172.102, 209.250.172.114 and 209.250.173.99 (those were the three other "interacting" IP addresses, when I stumbled upon them), but there might be more. Greetings. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 10:08, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but did you intend to remove my advice to the user after others had referenced it? If not I would like it restored. I'm brushing up on the various mop activities prior to a run for the tool. Hasteur ( talk) 19:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung, you know more about this stuff than I do--I noticed you denied some user rights on User talk:GoShow; right after your message I commented on their incorrect use of STiki (I'm not exactly sure what that is) to claim vandalism/test edits. I have some other issues with this editor (websites claimed to be RS on astrology articles), but I though you might like to know. Ah, I see now that they have rollback--if it were up to me I'd pull it, but I would appreciate your second opinion. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 16:29, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
You posted a blocked template on this IP's talk page, but they actually don't appear to still be blocked. I'm not sure if you're currently around to look at this, but if not, maybe one of your talk page stalkers can take care of it. Automatic Strikeout 05:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I know you're active at PERM, and was wondering if you noticed the fairly long backlog at WP:PERM/RV. Regards, TRLIJC19 ( talk • contribs) 22:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
— ΛΧΣ 21™ 01:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung. So, I've received three different emails (generally from people who were around during the start of WP:CVUA) suggesting that I put in an RFA. While I would find The Tools™ useful in what I do, I just don't think I'm ready at all (though, I have some serious self-worth issues that I'm working to fix). As someone who has generally been around the same places, but that I don't feel like I have a close, personal relationship with, I'm wondering if you'd be willing to look through my contributions and assess my chances at RFA. I think I can be useful, but I don't want "another premature CVUA RFA", as it were. If you have time, I'd really appreciate a 100% honest and open review of my chances at RFA. Cheers! Achowat ( talk) 18:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to participate in my RfA. I hope that I will be able to improve based on the feedback I received and become a better editor. Automatic Strikeout 02:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I desperately need confirmed status on my account. I cannot wait 4 days for autoconfirmation. I am being denied on the basis that my article isn't finished yet. I do not understand this. Can you please explain to me what the reasoning is behind such a rule? I am new to wikipedia, and I understand that there are rules, but why a rule that insists that I complete the text portion of an article before I can upload images? Please see: Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Confirmed#User:C_Coligniero Why can't I do the article one portion at a time? -- C Coligniero ( talk) 02:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey all :).
We're (very shortly) closing down this development cycle for Page Curation. It's genuinely been a pleasure to talk with you all and build software that is so close to my own heart, and also so effective. The current backlog is 9 days, and I've never seen it that low before.
However! Closing up shop does not mean not making any improvements. First-off, this is your last chance to give us a poke about unresolved bugs or report new ones on the talkpage. If something's going wrong, we want to know about it :). Second, we'll hopefully be taking another pass over the software next year. If you've got ideas for features Page Curation doesn't currently have, stick them here.
Again, it's been an honour. Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 12:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
สวัสดี (Sawadee) and ostentatiously appreciated for working well with registered and IP accounts. -- GoShow (............................) 16:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
Hello,
I am wondering why you deleted the AMRAP Nutrition page.
Please tell me how it appeared to be promotional / advertising as I trust your opinion and respect your concern for keeping garbage out of Wikipedia. However this company is doing good things and I am one of many that think we should support them.
Kindly review their Facebook page ( https://www.facebook.com/AMRAPnutrition ) and please let me know your final thoughts as I will respect and support them.
Thank you and have a nice day!
Hey Kudpung, I assume you noted my user page as unreadable for one of two reasons: 1) the colours hurt your eyes, or 2) it doesn't render properly in your browser. I wanted to note that I have no emotional attachment to any aspect of it, but also that there is a thought process here.
As far as the colours go, I understand that they are not the standard on Wikipedia, but they exist in that form for a reason. If you spend any time using a command line or text-based operating system, you know that such software is almost always distributed with black backgrounds and non-white text. This is because people who spend excessive amounts of time looking at text on computer screens usually find (if they have given it a good shot) that such a colour scheme tends to keep the eyes from getting tired. If you note the image to the right, that is what my user page looks like in a text-based environment. I did not choose those colours, that is how the software is distributed. I would be happy to change the colours, I just chose those because it is what I am used to seeing elsewhere. I have never had anyone come to me (in person or on Wikipedia) to say that they could not read my user page, but that does not mean there aren't people out there who can't (triple negative!).
With respect to rendering, I do look at my user page in modern and ancient browsers, and have only seen it not render properly with software that can't render the rest of Wikipedia anyway. Do you have a problem seeing it?
In short, I would change it without strife if someone could provide a credible reason for it. I would appreciate your thoughts. hajat vrc @ 07:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Done Any thoughts? hajat vrc @ 10:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Kudpung, maybe you can judge whether Peasant revolution in Thailand is a viable article--I have my doubts. The user has a specific interest in this field which you can see at Talk:Peasant's revolution. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 17:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Kudpung! It's a been a while since we talked, but I just had a question about WP:NPP that I thought you'd be more than fit to answer. In instances like this, I end up having an edit conflict/such with one of the copyright bots -- which I am unaware of until after saving the page, because of the way Twinkle processes CSD tagging. My question for you is: Is my tagging completely redundant (and should be reverted, trouted, and thrown into a large cage), or... not? Thanks, Theo polisme 13:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung,
Thank you for your comments in response to my question about the article on Jason Shulman. I'm new to Wiki, so your comments were very helpful.
I wondered if I could check something with you...
I had believed that the following establishes Rev Shulman’s notability:
I'd be grateful for any thoughts you could offer on how I could build my case based on these facts...?
Thank you once again for taking the time to write and give me feedback.
Best wishes, Sharadha ( Sharadha Bain ( talk) 16:50, 20 October 2012 (UTC))
Hi Kudpung, some users(most probably sock puppets) keep deleting my message for in NYU-Poly's talk page.
Thanks-- Magini ( talk) 21:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, Thank you once again for this very helpful feedback. May I run a quick question by you: Two well-known books about healing have dedicated an entire chapter each to Shulman and his teachings. The authors had no personal connection to him, so they are independent sources. Further: comments/blurbs for his books came from highly respected folk - Stephen Covey, Lama Surya Das, Carolyn Myss etc. Would these help in establishing notability? Thank you once again for your time and kind assistance. Sharadha ( Sharadha Bain ( talk) 12:11, 21 October 2012 (UTC))
... [1] JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung, Thank you for pointing me to the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. I will check there. You've been very kind indeed. Thank you for all the feedback and guidance. Sharadha ( Sharadha Bain ( talk) 23:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC))
Go Phightins ! 03:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Give the child a slap. -- Biker Biker ( talk) 18:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
What exactly is the point of trying to engage him on his talk page when he wouldn't listen to anyone else and has already made it clear he won't listen to me? But if you insist, next time I will. Automatic Strikeout 19:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Kudpung, I am completely aware that patrolling from the NPP backlog is what's recommended, and I try to. However in this case I was looking at "new editors contribs" under recent changes. I saw a mistake, fixed it, and when Fjozk came to my talk page I politely apologized, I explained how to resolve an edit conflict, I thanked him for his contributions, and asked him to come by if he had further questions. I assumed good faith. It was an honest mistake, one that I now am more careful about, and I just don't see why this has gotten so overblown. It was a single apostrophe. If people can get this riled up about an apostrophe, then I give up. Go Phightins ! 20:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
( edit conflict)( edit conflict) Wow, tryin' to get a word in edgways on my own tp ;) Well 'ere it is: :I agree entirely that this whole thing has been blown up out of proportion. See the conversation above with AutomaticStrikeout. The message going round the site at the moment is that the same signatures keep appearing on messages at ANI whether as plaintiffs or as uninvolved commentators. The only names that should be seen there with any regularity are those of the admins - and I'm sure you can figure out why that is. As for NPP, yes, it is indeed recommended to work from the back of the queue, but paradoxically those articles are the hardest to patrol because they are the ones that the newbs and kids have left after going for the low hanging fruit at the front of the queue. I would prefer to see the less experienced patrollers doing just that: leaving the tough pages for the experts to deal with. Almost everyone agrees that the real priority is at the front of the queue because that's where the hoax, attack, vandal, and copyvio pages are easily identified, and very quickly deleted. Fjozk made some very valid points in his posts at WT:NPP - do check out the entire thread because he's got the picture perfectly, it's just a shame he has a caustic way of commenting. As regards to incivility, if Arbcom won't block serial offenders, how do you expect us mere admins to risk our reputations (and perhaps our tools) for blocking anyone for something less? The best way to handle people like that is to ignore them. It usually works. Once you know your stuff really well at NPP, you can help us patrol the patrollers and correct the mess they make. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 21:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't take it upon myself to fix the world very often, but this article is seriously harmful. It needs to be completely scrapped and re-written or deleted altogether. I am very willing to work with somebody to re-write this article. If nobody else will, I would like to re-write the article myself. I will make it objective, have appropriate information, have good sources, etc (obviously different from the message I put on it). Please help me with this. I will speak to whoever I need to and put in as many complaints directly to Jimmy Wales's inbox as it takes if I have to (obviously a joke).
I am sorry if this comes off arrogant or generally crazy, but this article is not just a poor article - it is a problem. It is harmful for it to be visible to the public, and it is not appropriate for the purposes of wikipedia.
I appreciate whatever help you can give me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.0.32.44 ( talk) 02:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
One's coming your way. Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 09:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung,
I just received notice about the deletion of the page I made. I saw your notes, "subject not important" to put in an encyclopedia.
My ambition to start this page is well Im an American student studying my masters in Norway at BI Norwegian Business School.
The Alumni Association here enables students to meet with past alumni, to speak about jobs, mentoring, networking things like that.
I did my undergrad in the US, and the day I graduated I received an email from the alumni department at my school asking for donations..
WHY i made this page is, well i think this is one hell of a vision, instead of asking for money, they operate solely on funding from school, to benefit their former and current students. The closeness of the university to its former students is fantastic, their cooperation and everything is like nothing i have seen before, because it is a program that reaches out rather, asks for funding.
I know alumni isnt the hottest of topics. But there is a page for Texas Tech Alumni Association, so i though that mine would be applicable and even more relevant.
Please, could you assist me with recommendations, or help me get this posted.
Thank you very much
Kevin Cassidy — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinCassidy16 ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, I used {{ Copyvio-revdel}} but I'm not sure if there are any admins who watch the category it places it's tranclusions into, which is Category:Requested RD1 redactions. So since you are quite active I thought I'd let you know just in case. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 12:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Please advise why? WillyDonker ( talk) 13:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/business/news/9702505.Acquisition_will_help_Canford_expand/
“A HIGH-TECH company which supplies equipment that enabled billions to watch the Royal Wedding live is set to expand after increasing exports by 38 per cent.”
http://www.canford.co.uk/News/428_Royal-wedding-audio-and-video-routed-through-Canford-panels Canford are also connected to G20 and the Olympics http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/business/news/4272201.Cable_firm_makes_connections_at_G20/ Canford are global Brittan France Germany and Dubai http://www.durhamtimes.co.uk/archive/2012/02/15/Business%3A+News/9532561.Electronics_firm_Canford_opens_Dubai_office/ BVE norths review on canford audio plc http://www.bvenorth.co.uk/Show_Exhdetails1.aspx?exhid=exhiReg2&id=det
Canford own NEAL recordings who supply Recorders to worldwide police and benefit agencies and immigration services (Recorders always seen on tv) As you can see here canford also supply the military. http://www.armedforces.co.uk/companies/raq3f66e75f6be0d £6m liabilities http://companycheck.co.uk/company/01385727
As you can see canford is a company with another UK site at the far end of the country, and with offices in France Dubai and Germany. If these sources are not enough then i am happy to admit defeat.
Thanks WillyDonker ( talk) 14:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Top class Admin. Listens to all points fairly even from a wiki newbie like me. Provides a informative and enjoyable start to wiki-ing. I think Im hooked already. Thank you! WillyDonker ( talk) 14:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you Willy! You know, I've got a load or barnstars and stuff, but that's the nicest message I've had in my 6 years here. Made an old man's day! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 15:08, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, there have been four warnings on this user's page since last month when we attempted an ANI report. Is there anything we can do at this point? RFC/U? Elizium23 ( talk) 18:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belton Standpipe (Belton, South Carolina), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belton ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
I think, this article needs a more experienced editor than me. I proded it, at first. Check the history but the creator keeps removing my other tags (e.g. {{ stub}}, {{ uncategorised}}, etc). Best Regards, Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 13:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Kudpung.Actually i am bit confused with this. Am i granted permission or declined ? Thank You 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 18:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
I am kinda at a loss, I've re-read the documentation here Template:Non-administrator observation as you suggested and I don't see what that documentation has anything to do with the amount of edits made. You made another comment a while back here which is more confusing, which comment do stand behind ? this one or this one. An editor pinged me in IRC and was upset because they thought they got me in trouble after seeing your comment (today) as they were the one that pointed me to Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Account creator#User:Titodutta, I assured them they had nothing to do with your comment. After thinking about this awhile your comment might have been placed as "a truly friendly reminder" but frankly I think it's caused more problems than it apparently meant to save. WP:PERM are project pages not owned by anyone, I don't see how my 600+ edits there has anything to do with you or WP:PERM. Please point me to some solid policy to the contrary and we can continue this discussion, if not you please cease and desist. Cheers. Mlpearc ( powwow) 02:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I missed this whole Wikipedia community so so much! I was seriously taking decisions to retire from Wikipedia, but my heart stopped me from doing so. How are you, anyways? @ Dipankan Upgraded! Tag me! 07:31, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
Kudpung, thanks for the advice, I was bit confused about the whole, I just want it to contribute what ever I can, so thanks for the cool reminder,
cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdirisak ( talk • contribs) 16:40, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Caring Hands Learning Centers - you tagged it, I deleted it. Please see my reply to an objector. Peridon ( talk) 16:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
WikiPuppies bark dig 01:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Since you seem to be responding to queries in his stead, I was wondering if you could help me with something. Someone moved " A Picture is Worth a 1,000 Bucks" to " A Picture is Worth a Thousand Bucks". The user likely meant well, but the former is the episode's correct title. I tried to fix it myself, and not surprisingly, screwed it up even more. If you could move it back I would appreciate it. Thanks. Joefromrandb ( talk) 08:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page Waterloo Road School (Greenford) when it was a reliable page about a fictional school set in Greenford west london — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burrs002 ( talk • contribs) 14:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
and dealing with my whinging and whining about the state of affairs at Talk:Depictions of nudity. It seems so simple when ....... someone else does it. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 15:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Why did you username-block this one? There is gross self-promotion going on and I was about to prepare a note for COI/N and to ask MichaelQSchmidt ( talk) whether any of these films were notable; Jordanalan may end up blocked for advertising (though, as we don't tell new users what WP is not for, it would be only fair to warn him first), but I don't see a problem with him using his own name. There was an earlier account Jordanalan00 ( talk) but that has not edited since February so there isn't really a sock problem.
To illustrate the degree of self-promotion, I reverted here edits to one of his film articles which altered sourced statements that the film "was panned by the critics" and was "a box-office flop" to say, without sources, that it "garnered rave reviews" and "went on to unprecedented success"!
Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 18:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung. Can you please review my recent patrolling actions and tell me if I am doing good there. If that area is clean I will focus on working on patrolling of new pages. Thanking you, Dipankan001. @ Dipankan Upgraded! Tag me! 06:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung! I would like to soon create articles Osoyoos Times and Oliver Chronicle, but am afraid it wouldn't pass WP:GNG. They are city newspapers, and i find some newpaper articles on the Osoyoos Times, including one by CBC News. May I ask for your input? Thanks so much, TBr and ley 00:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thanks! Azylber ( talk) 03:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Armbrust The Homonculus 09:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)