Dear Kudpung, I kindly request that you please restore a page that you deleted: "Soulaymane Kachani" (WB:PROD July 23, 2013). The page was not well structured, was lacking references and some links were not working. If you restore the page, I will edit it and it will hopefully conform to your standards. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Columbia Faculty ( talk) 13:48, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kundpung, I'd like to request you to restore a page deleted by you named 'Esab' at 12:42, 22 August 2013. I need to work on it more and it will be helpful for the concerned community. Please restore the page. User ( Talk) 20:13, August 23, 2013 BDT
Dear Kundpung, I can only apologise for the lack of content included in the page created however I am uncertain what I am doing with it and thus have failed to use an references. I will attempt to do so but would be grateful if you could restore the page in the interim. Many thanks -- 213.160.100.5 ( talk) 09:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Paul.
Sorry for polling. The edit hasn't been reverted, So it appears to be alright. I won't do any more polling. I'll leave a message on the article talk page instead.-- Anderson I'm Willing To Help 22:11, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
As you have been quite active in the field of RfA reform, you might like to take a look at a rough draft I threw together at User:AutomaticStrikeout/Adminship RfC sandbox. Regards, AutomaticStrikeout ? 00:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung! Could you please move Mazurek Dąbrowskiego back to Poland Is Not Yet Lost? The latter is the consensus from the most recent move request where a conclusion was reached. I have let User:Rzuwig know that he can then open a new move request per WP:BRD. — Kpalion (talk) 07:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for expressing interest in attending a Wikimedia Asia meeting. We are urgently trying to decide whether the meeting should be held at 17:30 on Friday, 9 August, or Saturday, 10 August. Please indicate whether you are free on one or both of that dates in the on this page (scroll down if necessary) by 12:00 noon (Hong Kong time) on Friday, 9 August. This will help us decide which date suits the largest number of people. Check [1] to find out the confirmed date. Thanks. — SMUconlaw ( talk) 18:06, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
It was good to have a long talk just now as you were top of the list of Wikipedians that I had hoped to meet at Wikimania. Hope to see you again... Andrew Davidson ( talk) 06:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung,
I just wanted to thank you for granting me reviewer rights and provide you with an assurance that I too am here to build Wikipedia, not delete it. If you take a look at my public log, you'll see I regularly mark new pages as reviewed. I'm also working on an article in my user namespace at the moment. Kind regards, -- Forward Unto Dawn 09:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
I've amended the editnotice. What do you think? -- Redrose64 ( talk) 10:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Good to meet you. Hope your (considerably shorter) journey home was pleasant and that we keep in touch. Jon Davies (WMUK) ( talk) 13:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, as per your objection here, i have started archiving my talk.Thanks. भास्कर् Bhagawati Speak 20:44, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings Kudpung. I am concerned with the edits made by IP user 46.171.197.14 The individual has most lately been active on article Thermonuclear weapon. His or her edit history appears to have an unpleasant focus on personalities from history whom the IP identifies as Jewish. The edits made appear to be problematic in their intent. I have approached you because you are a well-respected admin, and may know the best approach to adopt. I sense trouble with this IP if he/she continues with this problematic choice of topic and editing style. Cheers Irondome ( talk) 21:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung-- I hope you enjoyed yourself at Wikimania this year. I have not yet gone to one, but I did just check out some of Jimbo's "State of the Wiki" addresses from the past few years over the last few days. I might find myself over in London for next year.
I wanted to follow-up on an offer you made some months ago for an assessment here in your second comment. I am considering a run for adminship sometime in the next year now that I am finished with school and can focus more on my work here. I check my e-mail regularly, so you do not need to leave an e-mail notice on my talk page. Also, there's no hurry on this request, but please let me know if you are still able to do so. With thanks, I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpong. I got your name from the list of available trainers at Wikipedia:NPRSCHOOL. I was wondering if you could offer me and User:Forward Unto Dawn your opinion regarding our disagreement at FUD's talk page? [2] -- Anthonyhcole ( talk · contribs · email) 07:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment here. Thanks. georgianJORJADZE 00:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Not to be a pest, but I'm quite curious as to when you will move forward with your RfC. Automatic Strikeout ( ₵) 22:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung. Can I nominate Callanecc for RfA? I believe that he can be an administrator. He has over 19000 edits, with 5900+ mainspace edits. He too has account creator, file mover, reviewer and rollback rights in Wikipedia and is a CVUA instructor. I believe that he know all the Wikipedia policies and won't abuse his admin rights. He do not have any warnings of any kind 3 months before RfA. Jianhui67 Talk 14:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
What is the problem with the changes to the Nick Turse page? All have relevant citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.88.211 ( talk) 15:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
What is the problem with the changes to the Nick Turse page? All have relevant citations. 128.122.88.211 ( talk) 15:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks again, Kudpung. :) --Qwerty Binary ( talk) 10:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Can I apply for CVUA to get experience to become a reviewer of rollback? KinHikhari ( talk) 13:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Those instructors I mentioned are quite good. But I'm not sure where you live, so it is essential to pick an instructor that has the same timezone as you. But I still think that like Kudpung said, that you understand what user rights are for before applying with one of the trainers. The CVUA course is relatively long. Mine lasted for 3 weeks. Jianhui67 Talk 14:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
You recently deleted the page Lee Merry since it was very poorly cited. I have now fixed those and want to see if I can get the page posted. Please let me know what I would need to do to make that happen. How can I vet the page before it goes live?
Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tresweet ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Kudpung. I ee you have granted reviewer rights to LogX. I have developed some concerns over his tagging for CSD and was wondering if you had any insight to offer. I have left a note on his talk expressing my concern, but I'm not good at this sort of thing. Any help you might provide would be appreciated. Thanks Dloh cierekim 23:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
get my emails? did i send to right email address? sats 07:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
G'day! Yes I just did. Wikipedia email comes into another computer on another server and I've been busy preparing something (see above). take care, and I hope to catch up with you again soon. The food in HK was good - shame there wasn't enough of it! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:33, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
I was looking at the list of instructors at CVUA, and I saw Artic Kangaroo on there. Perhaps he should be removed? Thanks, the one sean 22:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
List
|
---|
|
All users who have either been marked inactive or removed have been notified on their talk page. I created a template ( User:Theonesean/CVUA_inactive) for notification. I'll leave it up to someone with more experience to decide when to move the inactive reviewers to the inactive section. The raw list I used for tracking the accounts is available here: [3]. Also, I didn't audit former students. If you need anything else, don't hesitate to ask. the one sean 04:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Regarding your response on WP:RFP/R, he has actually asked me how many reverts to get rollback on my talk page. I told him it depends on him. Jianhui67 Talk 06:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm really sorry for my behavior first of all! I felt that the articles doesn't have sufficient references and subjects should be deleted so I marked them for deletion. I'll be more careful on that in future. Thanks a lot for your guidance and assistance. Sorry again! -- L o g X 13:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Can you please delete my user page alone? -- L o g X 16:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung.. I found during NPP that many new users are using a template which starts with "Subject of my article is" to create articles. I am unable to find out the name of the template, but hope that you must be knowing. It seems that this particular template is not clear enough, as although it is written to replace "Subject of my article" with the actual subject of article. Many users are not doing that and instead they leave the text "Subject of my article is" in the articles. A recent example is Erick Arc Elliott. Can you do something about it?--Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to thank you for following up the talk we had at Wikimania and for alerting me about the rfc. I am impressed by the depth of research you have put into the rfc. I hope we can keep in touch. Cheers BO | Talk 15:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Being encouraged from your comments stated on my last request for rollback rights, I've done lots more reverting and has been doing more reverting focusing on vandalism as stated on your comment/observation. I have a good grasp of what is vandalism, have read policies on vandalism, about rollback, looked & reverted clear cases of vandalism, content removal and many more as stated on my previous request. EuroCarGT 00:52, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
My previous request: [ previous request]
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to ask for user rights but on Wikipedia:Rollback#Requesting_rollback it says you could ask any admin.
Thanks a lot for your kind message on my talk page. I'm currently sorting through orphaned WikiProject:Med articles and I've seen some which I don't believe meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Am I correct if I then mark them with {{subst:Proposed deletion|concern=reason for proposed deletion}} tag to the page? I realise I initially tagged about ten articles with PROD without providing reasons, which I've since done. I since reverted and added a reason to 3-4 PRODs which were removed because I didn't provide a reason, but in the future I will use the {{Prod-2}} tag. Is this the customary way to behave? Kind Regards + thanks again for your gently-worded message, LT90001 ( talk) 10:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung! I would like to make you aware (if you aren't already ;-) of the fact, that user:Mike willaims (Saikat Nick Barua), who has been blocked by you recently, is circumventing his block by creating several sockpuppets and continuing to edit as before under a number of (semi-static?) IP addresses. One of the socks has been blocked already, but the other sock and the IPs are not, nor is any of the articles affected still semi-protected. This user's editing behaviour has not changed over the course of months, and basically he's spamming us since 2011 now. I have summarized the accounts and IPs I have isolated as clearly belonging to this same editor as well as a list of articles affected in this . If you find the time, please investigate the case. Thanks. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 14:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung, I was wondering if you could help me spread " WP:CfD/2013 August 28 - Category:Wikipedians by gender and subcats is something everyone should read. The decision to participate is all yours and I don't care one way or the other if you do or don't and if you do I don't care if you support or opposed. I'm only posting this here so that you will be aware and take any action you deem appropriate. Thank you. " to an evenly split group of possible keeps and delete !votes. I think it is something that most everyone should be aware of, whether or not they participate, and I don't want to be accused of canvassing. I've already posted it on WP:VPT and WP:VPM Thanks. Technical 13 ( talk) 15:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#A proposed tool for reducing backlogs. APerson ( talk!) 17:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting Herpetic gingivostomatitis prior to the move, much appreciated, Lesion ( talk) 20:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Would you please weigh in to the discussion at Talk:2013_Ghouta_attacks#Photo? Thoughts on an appropriate venue for discussion would be awesome, as would your opinion on the photo itself. Thanks! VQuakr ( talk) 00:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Can you please vouch for semi-protection on this page, the sheer number of ips vandalizing and pov pushing is astonishing. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#2013_Ghouta_attacks_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Cprotect.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29
Sopher99 ( talk) 02:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Guidance_for_younger_editors Semi protection is excessive for a page that has had like only three or four non autoconfirmed edits this year. NE Ent 02:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, what are the notability criteria for softwares? I came across WP:NSOFT, but that is an essay. Specifically can you examine this new article Hi slider. The subject is a new software released only 8-9 days back and it appears that article is solely created for promotional purposes (the original creator username gives obvious hint of COI).--Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, I am kindly requesting the reversal of your decision to delete the Kyle McMahon page (& 2 associated re-directs). To give you some background, myself and a few other fans had come together and gone to the Wikipedia Live Help chatroom and spoke with editors in there to make sure he met the requirements for Wikipedia. They all agreed he did. From there, we split our work up amongst ourselves and did a ton of research. Then everyone did their section and sent it to me, who then used my sandbox to test. I had the Wikipedia Live Help chat editors review and made their suggested changes before publishing. Once they approved, we published it and then the page was approved for publishing. Then, someone from Delaware, Kyle (& myself) homestate, tagged it for deletion. We don't know if this was personal, or what, but it was very frustrating as we came to the live editors first to even see if we should do all that work first. Then, it was put up for debate, so I told the other people that worked on it to come give their opinions too. Then someone said there was an influx of "new" / single purpose accounts, and I told them that was because of me telling the other contributors to join ( I didn't know that was frowned upon :( ) But I also didn't want anyone to think I was trying to cheat the system. In any event, we worked very hard. The bottom line for us, is that we believe someone with a major record label deal, with a worldwide release, who's worked with people like Madonna,did the US Open thing, has been on Oprah 4 times recently, a spokesperson for the Paternity Court TV show, and is a national public speaker on fatherless sons, is notable enough to be included in the wiki. I know you're doing your best to make sure there aren't spammers and solicitors and marketing people. We are not those people. We are just a group of people who support this remarkable kid in his career, and with multiple references in other people's wiki's, figured he deserved one of his own. Thanks for your time & sorry for the long winded-ness (typed-ness? lol) FeerTheDeer ( talk) 06:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Edited to add: We also neglected to see that there is an IMDB page on him, which none of us seemed to have caught when writing our sections. Obviously we would add that to the page as well, as it wasn't on there anywhere before. He's also since the wikipedia page was created, signed on with Paternity Court (a national tv show debuting in the fall) as a spokesperson. FeerTheDeer ( talk) 06:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted my page: /info/en/?search=Leroy_(software)
This is a legitimate piece of software and everything I put on the page was factual. I wanted to include this in wikipedia along with all the other release automation software that is also there. What was wrong with what I posted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snuggletron ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung,
I was in a process of creating page for Kallsoft, an emerging software firm in India. I felt it would be informative for people to add wiki page. I had also listed their product under List of ERP packages. I don't know why my work was deleted. I'm new to wiki contributor list, but very old user and donor. Please help me to undelete the page.
Regards, Arun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkallaje ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
I ask you to reconsider deleting the page I posted concerning Nite Tours. It is an industry created to show people the nightlife in major cities and allow them to participate in the various activities available. Darin Feth, when he created Nite Tours, created the night tour business as it is known today. It is in the same vein as Microsoft in the computing industry and McDonalds in the fast food industry, which you allow pages. By using the Nite Tours name, we are representing an industry and a lifestyle as opposed to a company. I don't understand why some companies which are inventive in an industry can have pages and yet you deny me. I ask you again to reconsider my request. AllaninAlb ( talk) 20:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC).
Dear Kudpung,
I went through sections and procedures of Wikipedia.
Your view: A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject.
My view: Article about a company, corporation or organization is useful if that organization really provides the services as described in the page. I feel that a company has the right to share the information of what it offers, it is an information after all. If it were advertising, it would go ahead with an ad agency, not wiki. I believe wikipedia is an information source, it would be biased if a worthy information is missing in Wikipedia. Might not be worthy for millions, but for people who are relevant to that subject.
Right view: You are the better person to judge as I was only an information seeker with wikipedia from 2005 until today. But you are experienced and close associate at Wikipedia from 2005. I respect your decision, but request you to review.
Thank you Regards, Arun
Thanks, that's what I thought, but given my involvement with this article, I thought it best to get a second opinion Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
How can I stop a user from continuously vandalizing my user page. I did a user report on Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism however I want the user to stop immediately. Any help will be great. ///EuroCarGT 15:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Kindly email me a copy of the article Leroy (software) which you deleted. My email is sammmacharia at gmail dot com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.24.111.246 ( talk) 17:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kudpung, you told me the following "if you intend to engage in an activity that may increase traffic to your talk page, please see WP:NLS (even ToolServer can't parse it)." – Thanks for the advice. Still I am unsure what you imply. I was not aware that my user name might be a problem for other users to reach my talk page. Would it be a solution to use a signature as described in WP:NLS? Thank you very much and kind regards, 㓟 ( talk) 01:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your help! Kind regards, User:㓟 - (pi) ( talk) 01:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
The information is already listed on another page. In fact the North Korea article I did edit to keep. The Vietnam and United Nations article contains nothing but a blank template looking page, with one line containing the date they joined. All of which is already on the United Nations member states page. Also while I've had some issues with AfD in the past, for the most part my views are being held up in regards to consensus. The CSD definitions though I'm still having a tough time fully understanding since what the title calls the CSD and the actual criteria can be sometimes be a bit different. I was encouraged to try and use CSD more often then AfD for those cases where it could apply, thus preventing an AfD for something that could be CSDd. I will say I've decided to stop patrolling anything having to do with sports. There seems to be more exceptions, to the exception, to the exception to the GNG then any other topic. I was talking with another experienced Wiki editor at a local city gathering. We both discussed how it seems there needs to be some type of central guide for all the exceptions to GNG. Right now you end up having to search through multiple essays/wiki policies to find out if there's an exception. This is where I get hit normally on an AfD - the article is non-notable, but somewhere, someplace there's an exception to the GNG allowing said article. In terms of contributing I wouldn't mind working on such a list, but I'd need help finding all the essays/exceptions to put together such a list. Also it seems a number of my first time errors are coming to light again recently because of relistings of relistings, not because of new/repeat issues of the same nature. As always I welcome further guidance regardless of if it's positive or negative. Caffeyw ( talk) 06:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
PS Once I posted it under the correct CSD an admin deleted the article. Caffeyw ( talk) 06:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 11:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kudpung, There are four different candidates in the upcoming New Haven mayoral election, and only one of them, Toni Harp, had her own page. I felt that all four of them deserved coverage on Wikipedia, although it is true that the stubs do not really qualify as full-fledged articles. I will let you be the judge. The pages I added are Kermit Carolina, Justin Elicker, and Henry Fernandez (politician). -- PlantPerson ( talk) 14:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Noting the lengthy deletion log of this page, what is the best approach for dealing with this: User:Khanjabir3? It appears to be a duplicate of the most recent version of that page. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 14:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kudpung, I kindly request that you please restore a page that you deleted: "Soulaymane Kachani" (WB:PROD July 23, 2013). The page was not well structured, was lacking references and some links were not working. If you restore the page, I will edit it and it will hopefully conform to your standards. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Columbia Faculty ( talk) 13:48, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kundpung, I'd like to request you to restore a page deleted by you named 'Esab' at 12:42, 22 August 2013. I need to work on it more and it will be helpful for the concerned community. Please restore the page. User ( Talk) 20:13, August 23, 2013 BDT
Dear Kundpung, I can only apologise for the lack of content included in the page created however I am uncertain what I am doing with it and thus have failed to use an references. I will attempt to do so but would be grateful if you could restore the page in the interim. Many thanks -- 213.160.100.5 ( talk) 09:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Paul.
Sorry for polling. The edit hasn't been reverted, So it appears to be alright. I won't do any more polling. I'll leave a message on the article talk page instead.-- Anderson I'm Willing To Help 22:11, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
As you have been quite active in the field of RfA reform, you might like to take a look at a rough draft I threw together at User:AutomaticStrikeout/Adminship RfC sandbox. Regards, AutomaticStrikeout ? 00:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung! Could you please move Mazurek Dąbrowskiego back to Poland Is Not Yet Lost? The latter is the consensus from the most recent move request where a conclusion was reached. I have let User:Rzuwig know that he can then open a new move request per WP:BRD. — Kpalion (talk) 07:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for expressing interest in attending a Wikimedia Asia meeting. We are urgently trying to decide whether the meeting should be held at 17:30 on Friday, 9 August, or Saturday, 10 August. Please indicate whether you are free on one or both of that dates in the on this page (scroll down if necessary) by 12:00 noon (Hong Kong time) on Friday, 9 August. This will help us decide which date suits the largest number of people. Check [1] to find out the confirmed date. Thanks. — SMUconlaw ( talk) 18:06, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
It was good to have a long talk just now as you were top of the list of Wikipedians that I had hoped to meet at Wikimania. Hope to see you again... Andrew Davidson ( talk) 06:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung,
I just wanted to thank you for granting me reviewer rights and provide you with an assurance that I too am here to build Wikipedia, not delete it. If you take a look at my public log, you'll see I regularly mark new pages as reviewed. I'm also working on an article in my user namespace at the moment. Kind regards, -- Forward Unto Dawn 09:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
I've amended the editnotice. What do you think? -- Redrose64 ( talk) 10:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Good to meet you. Hope your (considerably shorter) journey home was pleasant and that we keep in touch. Jon Davies (WMUK) ( talk) 13:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, as per your objection here, i have started archiving my talk.Thanks. भास्कर् Bhagawati Speak 20:44, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings Kudpung. I am concerned with the edits made by IP user 46.171.197.14 The individual has most lately been active on article Thermonuclear weapon. His or her edit history appears to have an unpleasant focus on personalities from history whom the IP identifies as Jewish. The edits made appear to be problematic in their intent. I have approached you because you are a well-respected admin, and may know the best approach to adopt. I sense trouble with this IP if he/she continues with this problematic choice of topic and editing style. Cheers Irondome ( talk) 21:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung-- I hope you enjoyed yourself at Wikimania this year. I have not yet gone to one, but I did just check out some of Jimbo's "State of the Wiki" addresses from the past few years over the last few days. I might find myself over in London for next year.
I wanted to follow-up on an offer you made some months ago for an assessment here in your second comment. I am considering a run for adminship sometime in the next year now that I am finished with school and can focus more on my work here. I check my e-mail regularly, so you do not need to leave an e-mail notice on my talk page. Also, there's no hurry on this request, but please let me know if you are still able to do so. With thanks, I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpong. I got your name from the list of available trainers at Wikipedia:NPRSCHOOL. I was wondering if you could offer me and User:Forward Unto Dawn your opinion regarding our disagreement at FUD's talk page? [2] -- Anthonyhcole ( talk · contribs · email) 07:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment here. Thanks. georgianJORJADZE 00:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Not to be a pest, but I'm quite curious as to when you will move forward with your RfC. Automatic Strikeout ( ₵) 22:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung. Can I nominate Callanecc for RfA? I believe that he can be an administrator. He has over 19000 edits, with 5900+ mainspace edits. He too has account creator, file mover, reviewer and rollback rights in Wikipedia and is a CVUA instructor. I believe that he know all the Wikipedia policies and won't abuse his admin rights. He do not have any warnings of any kind 3 months before RfA. Jianhui67 Talk 14:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
What is the problem with the changes to the Nick Turse page? All have relevant citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.88.211 ( talk) 15:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
What is the problem with the changes to the Nick Turse page? All have relevant citations. 128.122.88.211 ( talk) 15:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks again, Kudpung. :) --Qwerty Binary ( talk) 10:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Can I apply for CVUA to get experience to become a reviewer of rollback? KinHikhari ( talk) 13:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Those instructors I mentioned are quite good. But I'm not sure where you live, so it is essential to pick an instructor that has the same timezone as you. But I still think that like Kudpung said, that you understand what user rights are for before applying with one of the trainers. The CVUA course is relatively long. Mine lasted for 3 weeks. Jianhui67 Talk 14:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
You recently deleted the page Lee Merry since it was very poorly cited. I have now fixed those and want to see if I can get the page posted. Please let me know what I would need to do to make that happen. How can I vet the page before it goes live?
Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tresweet ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Kudpung. I ee you have granted reviewer rights to LogX. I have developed some concerns over his tagging for CSD and was wondering if you had any insight to offer. I have left a note on his talk expressing my concern, but I'm not good at this sort of thing. Any help you might provide would be appreciated. Thanks Dloh cierekim 23:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
get my emails? did i send to right email address? sats 07:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
G'day! Yes I just did. Wikipedia email comes into another computer on another server and I've been busy preparing something (see above). take care, and I hope to catch up with you again soon. The food in HK was good - shame there wasn't enough of it! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:33, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
I was looking at the list of instructors at CVUA, and I saw Artic Kangaroo on there. Perhaps he should be removed? Thanks, the one sean 22:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
List
|
---|
|
All users who have either been marked inactive or removed have been notified on their talk page. I created a template ( User:Theonesean/CVUA_inactive) for notification. I'll leave it up to someone with more experience to decide when to move the inactive reviewers to the inactive section. The raw list I used for tracking the accounts is available here: [3]. Also, I didn't audit former students. If you need anything else, don't hesitate to ask. the one sean 04:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Regarding your response on WP:RFP/R, he has actually asked me how many reverts to get rollback on my talk page. I told him it depends on him. Jianhui67 Talk 06:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm really sorry for my behavior first of all! I felt that the articles doesn't have sufficient references and subjects should be deleted so I marked them for deletion. I'll be more careful on that in future. Thanks a lot for your guidance and assistance. Sorry again! -- L o g X 13:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Can you please delete my user page alone? -- L o g X 16:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung.. I found during NPP that many new users are using a template which starts with "Subject of my article is" to create articles. I am unable to find out the name of the template, but hope that you must be knowing. It seems that this particular template is not clear enough, as although it is written to replace "Subject of my article" with the actual subject of article. Many users are not doing that and instead they leave the text "Subject of my article is" in the articles. A recent example is Erick Arc Elliott. Can you do something about it?--Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to thank you for following up the talk we had at Wikimania and for alerting me about the rfc. I am impressed by the depth of research you have put into the rfc. I hope we can keep in touch. Cheers BO | Talk 15:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Being encouraged from your comments stated on my last request for rollback rights, I've done lots more reverting and has been doing more reverting focusing on vandalism as stated on your comment/observation. I have a good grasp of what is vandalism, have read policies on vandalism, about rollback, looked & reverted clear cases of vandalism, content removal and many more as stated on my previous request. EuroCarGT 00:52, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
My previous request: [ previous request]
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to ask for user rights but on Wikipedia:Rollback#Requesting_rollback it says you could ask any admin.
Thanks a lot for your kind message on my talk page. I'm currently sorting through orphaned WikiProject:Med articles and I've seen some which I don't believe meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Am I correct if I then mark them with {{subst:Proposed deletion|concern=reason for proposed deletion}} tag to the page? I realise I initially tagged about ten articles with PROD without providing reasons, which I've since done. I since reverted and added a reason to 3-4 PRODs which were removed because I didn't provide a reason, but in the future I will use the {{Prod-2}} tag. Is this the customary way to behave? Kind Regards + thanks again for your gently-worded message, LT90001 ( talk) 10:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung! I would like to make you aware (if you aren't already ;-) of the fact, that user:Mike willaims (Saikat Nick Barua), who has been blocked by you recently, is circumventing his block by creating several sockpuppets and continuing to edit as before under a number of (semi-static?) IP addresses. One of the socks has been blocked already, but the other sock and the IPs are not, nor is any of the articles affected still semi-protected. This user's editing behaviour has not changed over the course of months, and basically he's spamming us since 2011 now. I have summarized the accounts and IPs I have isolated as clearly belonging to this same editor as well as a list of articles affected in this . If you find the time, please investigate the case. Thanks. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 14:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung, I was wondering if you could help me spread " WP:CfD/2013 August 28 - Category:Wikipedians by gender and subcats is something everyone should read. The decision to participate is all yours and I don't care one way or the other if you do or don't and if you do I don't care if you support or opposed. I'm only posting this here so that you will be aware and take any action you deem appropriate. Thank you. " to an evenly split group of possible keeps and delete !votes. I think it is something that most everyone should be aware of, whether or not they participate, and I don't want to be accused of canvassing. I've already posted it on WP:VPT and WP:VPM Thanks. Technical 13 ( talk) 15:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#A proposed tool for reducing backlogs. APerson ( talk!) 17:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting Herpetic gingivostomatitis prior to the move, much appreciated, Lesion ( talk) 20:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Would you please weigh in to the discussion at Talk:2013_Ghouta_attacks#Photo? Thoughts on an appropriate venue for discussion would be awesome, as would your opinion on the photo itself. Thanks! VQuakr ( talk) 00:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Can you please vouch for semi-protection on this page, the sheer number of ips vandalizing and pov pushing is astonishing. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#2013_Ghouta_attacks_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Cprotect.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29
Sopher99 ( talk) 02:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Guidance_for_younger_editors Semi protection is excessive for a page that has had like only three or four non autoconfirmed edits this year. NE Ent 02:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, what are the notability criteria for softwares? I came across WP:NSOFT, but that is an essay. Specifically can you examine this new article Hi slider. The subject is a new software released only 8-9 days back and it appears that article is solely created for promotional purposes (the original creator username gives obvious hint of COI).--Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, I am kindly requesting the reversal of your decision to delete the Kyle McMahon page (& 2 associated re-directs). To give you some background, myself and a few other fans had come together and gone to the Wikipedia Live Help chatroom and spoke with editors in there to make sure he met the requirements for Wikipedia. They all agreed he did. From there, we split our work up amongst ourselves and did a ton of research. Then everyone did their section and sent it to me, who then used my sandbox to test. I had the Wikipedia Live Help chat editors review and made their suggested changes before publishing. Once they approved, we published it and then the page was approved for publishing. Then, someone from Delaware, Kyle (& myself) homestate, tagged it for deletion. We don't know if this was personal, or what, but it was very frustrating as we came to the live editors first to even see if we should do all that work first. Then, it was put up for debate, so I told the other people that worked on it to come give their opinions too. Then someone said there was an influx of "new" / single purpose accounts, and I told them that was because of me telling the other contributors to join ( I didn't know that was frowned upon :( ) But I also didn't want anyone to think I was trying to cheat the system. In any event, we worked very hard. The bottom line for us, is that we believe someone with a major record label deal, with a worldwide release, who's worked with people like Madonna,did the US Open thing, has been on Oprah 4 times recently, a spokesperson for the Paternity Court TV show, and is a national public speaker on fatherless sons, is notable enough to be included in the wiki. I know you're doing your best to make sure there aren't spammers and solicitors and marketing people. We are not those people. We are just a group of people who support this remarkable kid in his career, and with multiple references in other people's wiki's, figured he deserved one of his own. Thanks for your time & sorry for the long winded-ness (typed-ness? lol) FeerTheDeer ( talk) 06:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Edited to add: We also neglected to see that there is an IMDB page on him, which none of us seemed to have caught when writing our sections. Obviously we would add that to the page as well, as it wasn't on there anywhere before. He's also since the wikipedia page was created, signed on with Paternity Court (a national tv show debuting in the fall) as a spokesperson. FeerTheDeer ( talk) 06:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted my page: /info/en/?search=Leroy_(software)
This is a legitimate piece of software and everything I put on the page was factual. I wanted to include this in wikipedia along with all the other release automation software that is also there. What was wrong with what I posted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snuggletron ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung,
I was in a process of creating page for Kallsoft, an emerging software firm in India. I felt it would be informative for people to add wiki page. I had also listed their product under List of ERP packages. I don't know why my work was deleted. I'm new to wiki contributor list, but very old user and donor. Please help me to undelete the page.
Regards, Arun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkallaje ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
I ask you to reconsider deleting the page I posted concerning Nite Tours. It is an industry created to show people the nightlife in major cities and allow them to participate in the various activities available. Darin Feth, when he created Nite Tours, created the night tour business as it is known today. It is in the same vein as Microsoft in the computing industry and McDonalds in the fast food industry, which you allow pages. By using the Nite Tours name, we are representing an industry and a lifestyle as opposed to a company. I don't understand why some companies which are inventive in an industry can have pages and yet you deny me. I ask you again to reconsider my request. AllaninAlb ( talk) 20:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC).
Dear Kudpung,
I went through sections and procedures of Wikipedia.
Your view: A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject.
My view: Article about a company, corporation or organization is useful if that organization really provides the services as described in the page. I feel that a company has the right to share the information of what it offers, it is an information after all. If it were advertising, it would go ahead with an ad agency, not wiki. I believe wikipedia is an information source, it would be biased if a worthy information is missing in Wikipedia. Might not be worthy for millions, but for people who are relevant to that subject.
Right view: You are the better person to judge as I was only an information seeker with wikipedia from 2005 until today. But you are experienced and close associate at Wikipedia from 2005. I respect your decision, but request you to review.
Thank you Regards, Arun
Thanks, that's what I thought, but given my involvement with this article, I thought it best to get a second opinion Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
How can I stop a user from continuously vandalizing my user page. I did a user report on Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism however I want the user to stop immediately. Any help will be great. ///EuroCarGT 15:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Kindly email me a copy of the article Leroy (software) which you deleted. My email is sammmacharia at gmail dot com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.24.111.246 ( talk) 17:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kudpung, you told me the following "if you intend to engage in an activity that may increase traffic to your talk page, please see WP:NLS (even ToolServer can't parse it)." – Thanks for the advice. Still I am unsure what you imply. I was not aware that my user name might be a problem for other users to reach my talk page. Would it be a solution to use a signature as described in WP:NLS? Thank you very much and kind regards, 㓟 ( talk) 01:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your help! Kind regards, User:㓟 - (pi) ( talk) 01:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
The information is already listed on another page. In fact the North Korea article I did edit to keep. The Vietnam and United Nations article contains nothing but a blank template looking page, with one line containing the date they joined. All of which is already on the United Nations member states page. Also while I've had some issues with AfD in the past, for the most part my views are being held up in regards to consensus. The CSD definitions though I'm still having a tough time fully understanding since what the title calls the CSD and the actual criteria can be sometimes be a bit different. I was encouraged to try and use CSD more often then AfD for those cases where it could apply, thus preventing an AfD for something that could be CSDd. I will say I've decided to stop patrolling anything having to do with sports. There seems to be more exceptions, to the exception, to the exception to the GNG then any other topic. I was talking with another experienced Wiki editor at a local city gathering. We both discussed how it seems there needs to be some type of central guide for all the exceptions to GNG. Right now you end up having to search through multiple essays/wiki policies to find out if there's an exception. This is where I get hit normally on an AfD - the article is non-notable, but somewhere, someplace there's an exception to the GNG allowing said article. In terms of contributing I wouldn't mind working on such a list, but I'd need help finding all the essays/exceptions to put together such a list. Also it seems a number of my first time errors are coming to light again recently because of relistings of relistings, not because of new/repeat issues of the same nature. As always I welcome further guidance regardless of if it's positive or negative. Caffeyw ( talk) 06:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
PS Once I posted it under the correct CSD an admin deleted the article. Caffeyw ( talk) 06:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 11:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kudpung, There are four different candidates in the upcoming New Haven mayoral election, and only one of them, Toni Harp, had her own page. I felt that all four of them deserved coverage on Wikipedia, although it is true that the stubs do not really qualify as full-fledged articles. I will let you be the judge. The pages I added are Kermit Carolina, Justin Elicker, and Henry Fernandez (politician). -- PlantPerson ( talk) 14:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Noting the lengthy deletion log of this page, what is the best approach for dealing with this: User:Khanjabir3? It appears to be a duplicate of the most recent version of that page. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 14:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)