Peer Review You choose a great topic to expand on and what you have contributed so far is very good. The biggest thing that I see needs work is to place your sources within the information.Also, Under the section The function of the new court it should not start with "because", because these articles that we are writing or adding to are supposed to be reliable. We have to be careful with word choice. Amarsha8 ( talk) 06:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
I think your article is very well thought and concise. It is also very informative. The one suggestion I would make is to add pictures and edit any grammatical errors but overall it is really good. (Cyuan Clutzenb ( talk) 03:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC))
Peer Review You choose a great topic to expand on and what you have contributed so far is very good. The biggest thing that I see needs work is to place your sources within the information.Also, Under the section The function of the new court it should not start with "because", because these articles that we are writing or adding to are supposed to be reliable. We have to be careful with word choice. Amarsha8 ( talk) 06:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
I think your article is very well thought and concise. It is also very informative. The one suggestion I would make is to add pictures and edit any grammatical errors but overall it is really good. (Cyuan Clutzenb ( talk) 03:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC))