Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Michaelbusch 20:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Reskin Theory, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Reskin Theory satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reskin Theory and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Reskin Theory during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dloh cierekim 22:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Reskin Theory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Ten Pound Hammer • (
Broken clamshells•
Otter chirps) 22:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Okay, let's get started...
Here's some quick sources I found via Google:
I'll move the content from the previous article into Barbara Reskin. — Scien tizzle 23:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
— Scien tizzle 23:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
One thing we'll eventually have to work on is the tone of the Reskin Theory section. Wikipedia policy prohibits original research. Essentially, what this means is that all statements in an article must be attributable to a reliable published source. As much as we'd like, there's no room for our own synthesis, therefore we must rely on other reliable published sources.
Be aware of this as you continue your work, and we can revisit the subject when the article is more complete. — Scien tizzle 23:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Michaelbusch 20:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Reskin Theory, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Reskin Theory satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reskin Theory and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Reskin Theory during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dloh cierekim 22:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Reskin Theory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Ten Pound Hammer • (
Broken clamshells•
Otter chirps) 22:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Okay, let's get started...
Here's some quick sources I found via Google:
I'll move the content from the previous article into Barbara Reskin. — Scien tizzle 23:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
— Scien tizzle 23:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
One thing we'll eventually have to work on is the tone of the Reskin Theory section. Wikipedia policy prohibits original research. Essentially, what this means is that all statements in an article must be attributable to a reliable published source. As much as we'd like, there's no room for our own synthesis, therefore we must rely on other reliable published sources.
Be aware of this as you continue your work, and we can revisit the subject when the article is more complete. — Scien tizzle 23:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)