You misunderstood my edit summary. The quote has been stable in the article for some time. In order to change it you need to establish that there is consensus to change. Per WP:BRD, you made a "bold" change, you were reverted and you now should not revert but take it to the talk page to discuss. I did not say that I was against the change because of consensus. I am against the change because it is an extremely important and highly notable quote: a member of the royal family confirms the existence of corruption. The quote is set against the text discussing corruption. If you try to revert again, it will be edit warring (and remember edit-warring isn't just 3RR). DeCausa ( talk) 22:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
You misunderstood my edit summary. The quote has been stable in the article for some time. In order to change it you need to establish that there is consensus to change. Per WP:BRD, you made a "bold" change, you were reverted and you now should not revert but take it to the talk page to discuss. I did not say that I was against the change because of consensus. I am against the change because it is an extremely important and highly notable quote: a member of the royal family confirms the existence of corruption. The quote is set against the text discussing corruption. If you try to revert again, it will be edit warring (and remember edit-warring isn't just 3RR). DeCausa ( talk) 22:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)