Thank you for your note. I have responded at Talk:Dark energy. By the way, your English seems perfectly good to me. -- Amble ( talk) 17:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
No way. I still have English problems. For example, I do not understan one of your sentence: "That simply goes back to the overreliance on primary sources and lack of independent sources." Kozmokonstans ( talk)
Generally I agree. However in this special case the abstract of those papers wrote:
Inflation and compactification from galaxy redshifts:
"... and Lambda greater than 0" and "positive Lambda term is indicated"
and Cosmological parameters and redshift periodicity
"fitting to the previous optimum at Omega(0) equals 1/3, and lambda(0) equals 2/3."
I do not think one need to has independent source to be sure these papers wrote in their abstracts those papers got Lambda in cosmology. Well, I think I also put this to Paal's talk page. Please, answer there. Kozmokonstans ( talk) 15:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your note. I have responded at Talk:Dark energy. By the way, your English seems perfectly good to me. -- Amble ( talk) 17:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
No way. I still have English problems. For example, I do not understan one of your sentence: "That simply goes back to the overreliance on primary sources and lack of independent sources." Kozmokonstans ( talk)
Generally I agree. However in this special case the abstract of those papers wrote:
Inflation and compactification from galaxy redshifts:
"... and Lambda greater than 0" and "positive Lambda term is indicated"
and Cosmological parameters and redshift periodicity
"fitting to the previous optimum at Omega(0) equals 1/3, and lambda(0) equals 2/3."
I do not think one need to has independent source to be sure these papers wrote in their abstracts those papers got Lambda in cosmology. Well, I think I also put this to Paal's talk page. Please, answer there. Kozmokonstans ( talk) 15:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)