Hi Korrektor1917! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! – Vipz ( talk) 04:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Korrektor1917. Additions on the article National Bolshevism which you removed seem to have come from @ Kalmus1917. Did you see these history logs before creating an account and intentionally choose a similar username (K<...>1917)? – Vipz ( talk) 04:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- No. Purely coincidental. Korrektor1917 ( talk) 21:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that in
this edit to
Guancha, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
04:56, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello — the reason is because I believe this is a purposely inflammatory accusation to make against the news agency when it is only coming from one source that does not adequately back up its accusation. It is equivalent to putting an unsubstantiated accusation of sexual assault at the top of a random celebrity’s wiki page, when the source of such an accusation is likely making this claim for politically motivated reasons. Therefore I do not believe this is an appropriate or accurate designation, but a politically charged and biased one. Korrektor1917 ( talk) 09:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
American Communist Party. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aoidh ( talk) 02:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. I believe Madamepestilence and others are barraging the ACP Wikipedia page with purposely misleading information that is based solely on ideological grievances. For instance, the ACP Website and its statements do not mention "MAGA Communism," nor does it define itself as "far-right." This page is subject to a vicious barrage of attacks that has included outright libel and sexually perverse statements. Users like Madamepestilence and others are not basing their edits on the Party's statements, but on their own speculation.
- At most, the mention of two plenary member's affiliation with the slogan "MAGA Communism" should be sufficient. However, a section outlining "controversies" surrounding MAGA Communism, which cites hitjobs and does not use direct sources, is not relevant for this page. The repeated spamming of this "controversy" section by Madamepestilence and others is clearly not based on any research, but on their own dislike of formative members of this party. I am requesting that these users be permanently barred from making contributions to this page given the demonstrably ideological, rather than factual, edits to the page. Korrektor1917 ( talk) 03:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Aoidh (
talk)
02:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Hi Korrektor1917! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! – Vipz ( talk) 04:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Korrektor1917. Additions on the article National Bolshevism which you removed seem to have come from @ Kalmus1917. Did you see these history logs before creating an account and intentionally choose a similar username (K<...>1917)? – Vipz ( talk) 04:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- No. Purely coincidental. Korrektor1917 ( talk) 21:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that in
this edit to
Guancha, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
04:56, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello — the reason is because I believe this is a purposely inflammatory accusation to make against the news agency when it is only coming from one source that does not adequately back up its accusation. It is equivalent to putting an unsubstantiated accusation of sexual assault at the top of a random celebrity’s wiki page, when the source of such an accusation is likely making this claim for politically motivated reasons. Therefore I do not believe this is an appropriate or accurate designation, but a politically charged and biased one. Korrektor1917 ( talk) 09:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
American Communist Party. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aoidh ( talk) 02:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. I believe Madamepestilence and others are barraging the ACP Wikipedia page with purposely misleading information that is based solely on ideological grievances. For instance, the ACP Website and its statements do not mention "MAGA Communism," nor does it define itself as "far-right." This page is subject to a vicious barrage of attacks that has included outright libel and sexually perverse statements. Users like Madamepestilence and others are not basing their edits on the Party's statements, but on their own speculation.
- At most, the mention of two plenary member's affiliation with the slogan "MAGA Communism" should be sufficient. However, a section outlining "controversies" surrounding MAGA Communism, which cites hitjobs and does not use direct sources, is not relevant for this page. The repeated spamming of this "controversy" section by Madamepestilence and others is clearly not based on any research, but on their own dislike of formative members of this party. I am requesting that these users be permanently barred from making contributions to this page given the demonstrably ideological, rather than factual, edits to the page. Korrektor1917 ( talk) 03:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Aoidh (
talk)
02:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)