I left comments on July 21, do you plan on addressing some of these issues? Let me know if you need some help with the article. — Wackymacs ( talk ~ edits) 09:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with
sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of
disruptive edits, which earn
warnings and
blocks.
Failing to change the {{adoptme}} template to an {{adoptoffer}} template when you offer adoption to a user will result in you being slapped with a massive trout, it is your responsibility |
«l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Hope your enjoying your break. I've been working on the Thriller album, I expanded the lead (per your suggestion) and added a "background" section. On your return could you CE the lead and new section? No need to rush, I don't expect to hear from you within a week or so, but I though I wound ask now in case I forget. After that I might consider taking it to FA if I'm not too busy in real life. Cheers :-) — Realist2 ( Speak) 23:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Will try, I managed to add a little. — Realist 2 18:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I'm Hunter. I just put my article for Sebastian Shaw, the stage actor best known for Return of the Jedi, up for a peer review with an eye on a possible featured article status down the road. I'm really pretty new to the Wikipedia thing, but the peer review thing said the best way to go about it was to ask others to peer review it and review their stuff in exchange. I'm not sure if Shaw falls into your area of interest, but I'm a big Beatles fan and would love to review your Strawberry Fields Forever article, if you'd perhaps like to give my Shaw one a whirl?
Also, if you ever need help in future Beatles articles, I'd love to help. Thanks, and let me know what you think of the review stuff!
-- Hunter Kahn ( talk) 22:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hallo, I am from the german Wikipedia from the sociologic section, and I found out that you wrote a song text on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Song . We want to know the reason(s) why you wrote this song. It would be kind of you to leave an english (or german) comment on http://de.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedistik/Soziologie/Musik&action=edit&redlink=1 . Thank you -- 84.166.123.219 ( talk) 07:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes folks, it’s the The time again. You might like to add your opinion (whatever it may be) on this page.-- andreasegde ( talk) 14:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
It would be easy to overlook because there are now two polls going at the same time. The newest one is here. Thanks. Ward3001 ( talk) 23:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm not a topic expert, but there appears to be a discrepancy in two different articles, and the sources cited for both are offline, so I can't check them.
I left comments on July 21, do you plan on addressing some of these issues? Let me know if you need some help with the article. — Wackymacs ( talk ~ edits) 09:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with
sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of
disruptive edits, which earn
warnings and
blocks.
Failing to change the {{adoptme}} template to an {{adoptoffer}} template when you offer adoption to a user will result in you being slapped with a massive trout, it is your responsibility |
«l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Hope your enjoying your break. I've been working on the Thriller album, I expanded the lead (per your suggestion) and added a "background" section. On your return could you CE the lead and new section? No need to rush, I don't expect to hear from you within a week or so, but I though I wound ask now in case I forget. After that I might consider taking it to FA if I'm not too busy in real life. Cheers :-) — Realist2 ( Speak) 23:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Will try, I managed to add a little. — Realist 2 18:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I'm Hunter. I just put my article for Sebastian Shaw, the stage actor best known for Return of the Jedi, up for a peer review with an eye on a possible featured article status down the road. I'm really pretty new to the Wikipedia thing, but the peer review thing said the best way to go about it was to ask others to peer review it and review their stuff in exchange. I'm not sure if Shaw falls into your area of interest, but I'm a big Beatles fan and would love to review your Strawberry Fields Forever article, if you'd perhaps like to give my Shaw one a whirl?
Also, if you ever need help in future Beatles articles, I'd love to help. Thanks, and let me know what you think of the review stuff!
-- Hunter Kahn ( talk) 22:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hallo, I am from the german Wikipedia from the sociologic section, and I found out that you wrote a song text on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Song . We want to know the reason(s) why you wrote this song. It would be kind of you to leave an english (or german) comment on http://de.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedistik/Soziologie/Musik&action=edit&redlink=1 . Thank you -- 84.166.123.219 ( talk) 07:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes folks, it’s the The time again. You might like to add your opinion (whatever it may be) on this page.-- andreasegde ( talk) 14:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
It would be easy to overlook because there are now two polls going at the same time. The newest one is here. Thanks. Ward3001 ( talk) 23:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm not a topic expert, but there appears to be a discrepancy in two different articles, and the sources cited for both are offline, so I can't check them.