You are invited to sign up for mediation at mediation site. Student7 ( talk) 20:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Received your note on my talk page.
I will reply further on the article talk page, but I wanted to let you know that I was not doing a "drive-by" tagging. I see specific issues and will explain and help improve the article.
I've read the talk page and am aware of the conflicts. You will not find me to be part of any "gang-up mentality".
I placed the tag on the page because as the article is now, it is off-track in several ways. The citations might be OK, but they need to be checked. Someone has misquoted at least one of them, that I have already corrected in the lead.
Don't worry, it will be a fair and accurate article eventually, though it may take a while. -- Jack-A-Roe ( talk) 00:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello - just a note, I think the information that was removed and you restored is probably good to be in the article, though it needs more references. If I see it deleted again, I might restore it, I need to read it again.
However, I wanted to let you know that you need to be careful not to exceed 3 reverts in a 24 hour period to avoid being blocked for a day. Please read WP:3RR to learn about this. Anytime a user is blocked, it goes in their "block log" and remains on their record forever, like a traffic ticket.
I thought you'd want to know about this so you don't violate the rule by accident. -- Jack-A-Roe ( talk) 20:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the FYI, but I can't really take anything you say seriously. You don't seem rational, and the personal attacks and bias you display on the talk page are a large part of your problem, as well as proof that you can't be trusted to maintain anything like an unbiased point of view. I'm not sure what behavior of mine you're referring to, unless it was when I ignored your sexism and the personal attacks you were making on me to ask you, nicely, to stop screwing up an article. Eceresa ( talk) 03:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi - I appologise for the length of time it's taken to find a mediator for the above case, but an administrator has offered to mediate the dispute for you. He is not a member of the mediation committee (yet anyway), but has good experience of mediation in other areas. Could you please go to the above link and state whether you accept his offer to mediate your dispute? Ryan Postlethwaite 23:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
You are invited to sign up for mediation at mediation site. Student7 ( talk) 20:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Received your note on my talk page.
I will reply further on the article talk page, but I wanted to let you know that I was not doing a "drive-by" tagging. I see specific issues and will explain and help improve the article.
I've read the talk page and am aware of the conflicts. You will not find me to be part of any "gang-up mentality".
I placed the tag on the page because as the article is now, it is off-track in several ways. The citations might be OK, but they need to be checked. Someone has misquoted at least one of them, that I have already corrected in the lead.
Don't worry, it will be a fair and accurate article eventually, though it may take a while. -- Jack-A-Roe ( talk) 00:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello - just a note, I think the information that was removed and you restored is probably good to be in the article, though it needs more references. If I see it deleted again, I might restore it, I need to read it again.
However, I wanted to let you know that you need to be careful not to exceed 3 reverts in a 24 hour period to avoid being blocked for a day. Please read WP:3RR to learn about this. Anytime a user is blocked, it goes in their "block log" and remains on their record forever, like a traffic ticket.
I thought you'd want to know about this so you don't violate the rule by accident. -- Jack-A-Roe ( talk) 20:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the FYI, but I can't really take anything you say seriously. You don't seem rational, and the personal attacks and bias you display on the talk page are a large part of your problem, as well as proof that you can't be trusted to maintain anything like an unbiased point of view. I'm not sure what behavior of mine you're referring to, unless it was when I ignored your sexism and the personal attacks you were making on me to ask you, nicely, to stop screwing up an article. Eceresa ( talk) 03:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi - I appologise for the length of time it's taken to find a mediator for the above case, but an administrator has offered to mediate the dispute for you. He is not a member of the mediation committee (yet anyway), but has good experience of mediation in other areas. Could you please go to the above link and state whether you accept his offer to mediate your dispute? Ryan Postlethwaite 23:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)