![]() | Lets all get on the same page! If I left a message on your talk page, respond on your talk page. I'll be watching, and respond to you there. If you leave me a message here, check back here, as I will respond to you on this page... ...I'll leave you a {{ Talkback}} notice to let you know I've responded if you ask me to. And don't forget to sign your post with a ~~~~ at the end. |
Welcome to Wikipedia, Knownalias! I am Madhero88 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{ helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
MaenK.A. Talk 12:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
title=List_of_Back_at_the_Barnyard_episodes&oldid=407056983 1], 2, 3, 4, 5. Please block 65.8.146.131? NintendoFan11 ( talk) 18:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
When using a twitter posts as a reference please link directly towards the post and not just to the users main page, just like we link towards a specific article and not just to the main website. Because non specific pages are dynamic these statements will soon disappear from the displayed reference. Thanks. Xeworlebi ( t• c) 14:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Be careful: when you see a contribution made by an unregistered contributor named with a number similar to 189.128.95.69 it is always vandalism. I say this to you because I saw you sent him an advise. For example he keeps writing false voice actors for the "Kid vs. Kat" cartoon for ages and he doesn't seem to be willing to stop! 93.150.22.5 14:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.150.22.97 ( talk)
I think you did a great job, especially for your first time. Looks very nice to me, although I am sure some editors will find some things to change. Often editors will duplicate the title reference next to the air date, so the date is sourced, too. You should link the main page to the list page in the infobox, so people know the list page already exists and can find it. (Not everyone reads talk pages.) The list page should have at least one category, such as Category:Lists of drama television series episodes.
The only think I would have done differently is that I would have used different references than you did for the premiere date/number of episodes. A real article/press release, for example, rather than using the side panel of The Futon Critic page, but, as you say on the R&I talk page, that would be a personal preference. When I create a list page, I often borrow those refs used on the main page. I was going to change them, but thought better of it because of your comments on the talk page. (Disclaimer: I tend to be a reference freak.) Looks great. -- Logical Fuzz ( talk) 22:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
As far as a ref for the number of episodes, this PR [1] which I used in the article mentions a 10-ep order. Since the show is is still filming (according to refs in R&I article, it is expected to take 5 months), you don't need to prove that 10 were actually produced. Alternatively, with the premiere almost here, there may be some other upcoming articles mentioning 10 eps, as well as the start date. It's not important to rush to change it (or change it at all), at least it's sourced.-- Logical Fuzz ( talk) 23:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
GREAT job on them. We are probably the only two Wikipedians that actually watch this show, LOL. QuasyBoy ( talk) 13:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Overlap conversation on IP talk page HERE
well I would stop if I found a source on there where it actually states they will have at least 20 episodes, and anothing is if this is true then why doesn't the episode guide go up that high?
thank you
--
75.18.50.150 (
talk) 19:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
As the mysterious guest-star blanker you reported to WP:AIV keeps changing IP addresses, I've just protected the article from editing by IPs for a week. If he pops up again elsewhere please let me know! ~ mazca talk 17:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for finally getting a proper source for House (season 7), turns out all those IP's adding "Thunder Roadtrip" were wrong after-all. Xeworlebi ( talk) 09:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Overlap conversation on -5- talk page HERE (See: Young Justice schedule)
Yes, the pilot is airing over the first two weeks. It is up to you whether you want to petition to unprotect the page, or just have the edit protection run its course. I can go with either one.
-5- (
talk) 10:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
I see. It threw me off because I thought the sources listed were from DOC, and they don't report summaries. I put the source next to the text so that there isn't confusion as to where it came from. Thanks for letting me know. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
The writer/director info is in the link that you was posted: [2], under the crew section. ;) Quasy Boy 19:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
So i saw the fun on the Body of Proof episode list. Crude formatting but good intent. You had been reverted. References were added. That be when i saw it. I merged the two tables using this convenient |AltDate=
option. My Italian isn't great but i can read the Italian broadcaster's website and everything that was there was correct. I added in the air dates. I mention this because there is potentially more fun to come from this. You may recall 4 episodes of Grey's Anatomy were bumped to season 2. Given the dates involved there is a really good chance the same sort of thing is going to happen with Body Of Proof if it gets renewed. The potential problem is that 1 of those 4 episodes has already been shown in Italy and the other 3 are for the first three Tuesdays in April. I think you know what might come from this.
And just to plug something, the Canadian show The Listener premièred on
Fox Series on 1 March 2009 and didn't make it to Canadian tv until 3 June 2009. I took what was there and constructed a similar layout of data on
The Listener's episode list though for Body Of Proof the US date is second because there is to be ratings data included and sticking ratings between two dates just looks wrong.
I watched a bit of the Italian tv rips of BOP and wasn't that impressed so i might not drift back to it much. Good luck.
delirious &
lost ☯
~hugs~ 08:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey, buddy! Take a second look at MOS:HASH. It doesn't say you can't use a hashmark to indicate a number. It simply says it can't be used to replace the word number in a sentence. The way we've used it here is perfectly acceptable. On the other hand, it does say that the use of the symbol № is never acceptable, although use of No. is. Drmargi ( talk) 03:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
OK, I read everything. I think we're grappling with a couple issues:
Which brings us to where we find ourselves now. I have no strong feelings one way or the other about use of # versus No, and could live with replacing the former with the latter on R&I and IPS. Perhaps what we should do is change the headings and replace # with No, which is clearly in compliance with MOS:HASH What do you think? Drmargi ( talk) 11:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Unrelated, and having no wish to clutter up your talk page, sympathies for the sockpuppet headache. I've just worked with another editor and two admins to get a global ban in place for as pernicious a sockmaster and farm as you'd ever care to see. I understand the headaches it all brings!! Drmargi ( talk) 12:30, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up/FYI: the dreaded symbol issue just popped up at List of The Glades episodes. I made the change to the older format, but this might be a new place to try the newer one out in time. I'm waiting to see if either of our strident friends pops up to pick a fight over the change first.
I didn't realize there was actually a source. The user who added it has a long history of making edits based solely on presumption. -- Scorpion 0422 23:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
He's back. This time he's User:Greg Xavier. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 19:15 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I'd def ask Elockid or MuZemike for reviewer rights CTJF83 23:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
You are one of the leading editors at 2011–12 United States network television schedule. I found a circular link back to wikipedia in the ABC section and replaced it with citation needed. Hopefully you can find a proper WP:RS for it and any other similar circular links.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 19:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
I added back the WWYD? fall premiere, and this time put a reference. Hope this FINALLY makes you happy and suits you! lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 ( talk • contribs) 22:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
As you'll now see, the reference is clearly direct form John Quinones himself, who personally told me about it. You can't logically now say that he is lying, or doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 ( talk • contribs) 02:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
First of all, he told me it LONG BEFORE May 2011, so I recommend you track those tweets much further back. Second, even if it's not necessarily going to be on the same timeslot this fall, it's still renewed which means it must at least be added to the "Returning series" column under ABC's list. Third, You could at least explain how to source SPECIFIC tweets, because I have no clue otherwise I would have done so already. Also, irrespective of the timeslot the show is remaining it's own series. It is never going to suddenly be used as segments on 20/20, because that show is simply sometimes used as a promo platform. I am smart enough with entertainment that I know my facts are accurate, and just typing this makes me feel lower than I am and dumber than I am. THANK YOU! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 ( talk • contribs) 19:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Why can't you just accept that I am correct and leave the edit alone? Why does John Quinones have to have a "reliable" third-party source to back HIM up? Why can't the HOST of the show be reliable enough? Jane Lynch from Glee and John Stewart have not a damn thing to do with any of this! P.S.: If you want a reliable source SO BAD, how about you try and find one for yourself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 ( talk • contribs) 16:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
There's a HUGE problem with your sources. You didn't even use the ACTUAL
ABC 2011-12 Primetime Fall Schedule to find info. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Core2012 (
talk •
contribs) 22:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
It most likely won't begin airing in 2012, because on Hulu.com/Bobs-Burgers, it says it will return in Fall 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ral725 ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
They've come back after their 1 week block and vandalized again. I've already reported them to AIV, if the ticket's still up, please feel free to comment on it. Thanks. Hasteur ( talk) 00:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi there. I was wondering if you'd noticed Let Me Eat Cake ( talk · contribs), and whether you would agree that it was another sock of JimmyDarmodyRules ( talk · contribs). Account was created a few days after 'Jimmy' was blocked indefinitely because he was evading block with IPs. Let Me Eat Cake ( talk · contribs) is editing Arrested Development, Falling Skies, and Hell on Wheels (TV series) pages, just like our previous socks. Editor is removing/unlinking red-links, as before. Editor complained of something being "too negative" on Falling Skies [3]. Editor removed "Plot" maintenance tags on a Falling Skies episode page without addressing the issue [4], [5], just like before [6]. Thoughts? -- Logical Fuzz ( talk) 16:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
This debate is re-emerging at Talk:Futurama (season 6). Just thought I should warn you Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 08:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The-Mentalist-Season-2-DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | Lets all get on the same page! If I left a message on your talk page, respond on your talk page. I'll be watching, and respond to you there. If you leave me a message here, check back here, as I will respond to you on this page... ...I'll leave you a {{ Talkback}} notice to let you know I've responded if you ask me to. And don't forget to sign your post with a ~~~~ at the end. |
Welcome to Wikipedia, Knownalias! I am Madhero88 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{ helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
MaenK.A. Talk 12:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
title=List_of_Back_at_the_Barnyard_episodes&oldid=407056983 1], 2, 3, 4, 5. Please block 65.8.146.131? NintendoFan11 ( talk) 18:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
When using a twitter posts as a reference please link directly towards the post and not just to the users main page, just like we link towards a specific article and not just to the main website. Because non specific pages are dynamic these statements will soon disappear from the displayed reference. Thanks. Xeworlebi ( t• c) 14:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Be careful: when you see a contribution made by an unregistered contributor named with a number similar to 189.128.95.69 it is always vandalism. I say this to you because I saw you sent him an advise. For example he keeps writing false voice actors for the "Kid vs. Kat" cartoon for ages and he doesn't seem to be willing to stop! 93.150.22.5 14:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.150.22.97 ( talk)
I think you did a great job, especially for your first time. Looks very nice to me, although I am sure some editors will find some things to change. Often editors will duplicate the title reference next to the air date, so the date is sourced, too. You should link the main page to the list page in the infobox, so people know the list page already exists and can find it. (Not everyone reads talk pages.) The list page should have at least one category, such as Category:Lists of drama television series episodes.
The only think I would have done differently is that I would have used different references than you did for the premiere date/number of episodes. A real article/press release, for example, rather than using the side panel of The Futon Critic page, but, as you say on the R&I talk page, that would be a personal preference. When I create a list page, I often borrow those refs used on the main page. I was going to change them, but thought better of it because of your comments on the talk page. (Disclaimer: I tend to be a reference freak.) Looks great. -- Logical Fuzz ( talk) 22:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
As far as a ref for the number of episodes, this PR [1] which I used in the article mentions a 10-ep order. Since the show is is still filming (according to refs in R&I article, it is expected to take 5 months), you don't need to prove that 10 were actually produced. Alternatively, with the premiere almost here, there may be some other upcoming articles mentioning 10 eps, as well as the start date. It's not important to rush to change it (or change it at all), at least it's sourced.-- Logical Fuzz ( talk) 23:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
GREAT job on them. We are probably the only two Wikipedians that actually watch this show, LOL. QuasyBoy ( talk) 13:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Overlap conversation on IP talk page HERE
well I would stop if I found a source on there where it actually states they will have at least 20 episodes, and anothing is if this is true then why doesn't the episode guide go up that high?
thank you
--
75.18.50.150 (
talk) 19:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
As the mysterious guest-star blanker you reported to WP:AIV keeps changing IP addresses, I've just protected the article from editing by IPs for a week. If he pops up again elsewhere please let me know! ~ mazca talk 17:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for finally getting a proper source for House (season 7), turns out all those IP's adding "Thunder Roadtrip" were wrong after-all. Xeworlebi ( talk) 09:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Overlap conversation on -5- talk page HERE (See: Young Justice schedule)
Yes, the pilot is airing over the first two weeks. It is up to you whether you want to petition to unprotect the page, or just have the edit protection run its course. I can go with either one.
-5- (
talk) 10:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
I see. It threw me off because I thought the sources listed were from DOC, and they don't report summaries. I put the source next to the text so that there isn't confusion as to where it came from. Thanks for letting me know. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
The writer/director info is in the link that you was posted: [2], under the crew section. ;) Quasy Boy 19:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
So i saw the fun on the Body of Proof episode list. Crude formatting but good intent. You had been reverted. References were added. That be when i saw it. I merged the two tables using this convenient |AltDate=
option. My Italian isn't great but i can read the Italian broadcaster's website and everything that was there was correct. I added in the air dates. I mention this because there is potentially more fun to come from this. You may recall 4 episodes of Grey's Anatomy were bumped to season 2. Given the dates involved there is a really good chance the same sort of thing is going to happen with Body Of Proof if it gets renewed. The potential problem is that 1 of those 4 episodes has already been shown in Italy and the other 3 are for the first three Tuesdays in April. I think you know what might come from this.
And just to plug something, the Canadian show The Listener premièred on
Fox Series on 1 March 2009 and didn't make it to Canadian tv until 3 June 2009. I took what was there and constructed a similar layout of data on
The Listener's episode list though for Body Of Proof the US date is second because there is to be ratings data included and sticking ratings between two dates just looks wrong.
I watched a bit of the Italian tv rips of BOP and wasn't that impressed so i might not drift back to it much. Good luck.
delirious &
lost ☯
~hugs~ 08:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey, buddy! Take a second look at MOS:HASH. It doesn't say you can't use a hashmark to indicate a number. It simply says it can't be used to replace the word number in a sentence. The way we've used it here is perfectly acceptable. On the other hand, it does say that the use of the symbol № is never acceptable, although use of No. is. Drmargi ( talk) 03:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
OK, I read everything. I think we're grappling with a couple issues:
Which brings us to where we find ourselves now. I have no strong feelings one way or the other about use of # versus No, and could live with replacing the former with the latter on R&I and IPS. Perhaps what we should do is change the headings and replace # with No, which is clearly in compliance with MOS:HASH What do you think? Drmargi ( talk) 11:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Unrelated, and having no wish to clutter up your talk page, sympathies for the sockpuppet headache. I've just worked with another editor and two admins to get a global ban in place for as pernicious a sockmaster and farm as you'd ever care to see. I understand the headaches it all brings!! Drmargi ( talk) 12:30, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up/FYI: the dreaded symbol issue just popped up at List of The Glades episodes. I made the change to the older format, but this might be a new place to try the newer one out in time. I'm waiting to see if either of our strident friends pops up to pick a fight over the change first.
I didn't realize there was actually a source. The user who added it has a long history of making edits based solely on presumption. -- Scorpion 0422 23:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
He's back. This time he's User:Greg Xavier. Rusted AutoParts ( talk) 19:15 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I'd def ask Elockid or MuZemike for reviewer rights CTJF83 23:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
You are one of the leading editors at 2011–12 United States network television schedule. I found a circular link back to wikipedia in the ABC section and replaced it with citation needed. Hopefully you can find a proper WP:RS for it and any other similar circular links.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 19:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
I added back the WWYD? fall premiere, and this time put a reference. Hope this FINALLY makes you happy and suits you! lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 ( talk • contribs) 22:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
As you'll now see, the reference is clearly direct form John Quinones himself, who personally told me about it. You can't logically now say that he is lying, or doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 ( talk • contribs) 02:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
First of all, he told me it LONG BEFORE May 2011, so I recommend you track those tweets much further back. Second, even if it's not necessarily going to be on the same timeslot this fall, it's still renewed which means it must at least be added to the "Returning series" column under ABC's list. Third, You could at least explain how to source SPECIFIC tweets, because I have no clue otherwise I would have done so already. Also, irrespective of the timeslot the show is remaining it's own series. It is never going to suddenly be used as segments on 20/20, because that show is simply sometimes used as a promo platform. I am smart enough with entertainment that I know my facts are accurate, and just typing this makes me feel lower than I am and dumber than I am. THANK YOU! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 ( talk • contribs) 19:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Why can't you just accept that I am correct and leave the edit alone? Why does John Quinones have to have a "reliable" third-party source to back HIM up? Why can't the HOST of the show be reliable enough? Jane Lynch from Glee and John Stewart have not a damn thing to do with any of this! P.S.: If you want a reliable source SO BAD, how about you try and find one for yourself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 ( talk • contribs) 16:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
There's a HUGE problem with your sources. You didn't even use the ACTUAL
ABC 2011-12 Primetime Fall Schedule to find info. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Core2012 (
talk •
contribs) 22:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
It most likely won't begin airing in 2012, because on Hulu.com/Bobs-Burgers, it says it will return in Fall 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ral725 ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
They've come back after their 1 week block and vandalized again. I've already reported them to AIV, if the ticket's still up, please feel free to comment on it. Thanks. Hasteur ( talk) 00:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi there. I was wondering if you'd noticed Let Me Eat Cake ( talk · contribs), and whether you would agree that it was another sock of JimmyDarmodyRules ( talk · contribs). Account was created a few days after 'Jimmy' was blocked indefinitely because he was evading block with IPs. Let Me Eat Cake ( talk · contribs) is editing Arrested Development, Falling Skies, and Hell on Wheels (TV series) pages, just like our previous socks. Editor is removing/unlinking red-links, as before. Editor complained of something being "too negative" on Falling Skies [3]. Editor removed "Plot" maintenance tags on a Falling Skies episode page without addressing the issue [4], [5], just like before [6]. Thoughts? -- Logical Fuzz ( talk) 16:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
This debate is re-emerging at Talk:Futurama (season 6). Just thought I should warn you Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 08:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The-Mentalist-Season-2-DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)