|
Glad to see another chemist join Wikipedia! Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry is one of several informal working-groups if you're looking for editors with interest and/or expertise in chemistry-related topics, ideas of what articles need work, etc. DMacks ( talk) 20:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Here are suggested readings: WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI. The gist of these guidelines are:
If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 14:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mass in special relativity, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Note- see also wp:Edit warring, wp:BRD, and Talk:Mass in special relativity#Dynamic mass. - DVdm ( talk) 21:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Exothermic reaction and exergonic reaction would benefit from your inspection. These articles are probably heavily consulted.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 21:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Good morning,
please express your opinion in the thread "relativistic mass" in the discussion with DVdm:
"The legitimacy of removing entries by DVdm in a topic of relativistic mass"
thank you in advance, Best Regards, RodriguesVector.
Hello, editor Klaus Schmidt-Rohr. I would be glad if you would kindly chat with me on my talk page about the definition of enthalpy. Chjoaygame ( talk) 20:50, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Klaus: you should remove your recent self-citations. Our guidelines advise against the practice, especially when the citation is to a primary source. -- Smokefoot ( talk) 01:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Just a note to tell you that I have fixed your citation for the Gislason and Craig article. You had written "ref name Gislason & Craig 2005", which the system rejected with the message "Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names". This means that the system does not allow spaces inside a ref name, and apparently reads Gislason, &, Craig and 2005 as 4 separate ref names!! AnomieBOT produced another incorrect version, so I went back to yours and just removed the spaces, and also added an = after ref name. I fixed all 3 citations to this reference, and they are correctly shown now. Dirac66 ( talk) 03:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
This is just to let you know I've reverted this edit of yours. I think I've explained why on the talk page, which is where further discussion of this, if any is required, should probably go. IpseCustos ( talk) 21:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Heat of combustion has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. IpseCustos ( talk) 16:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for continuing the discussion in various forums. While you have reverted some of my changes, I notice you haven't reverted those referring to oxygen as "high-energy", an "energy source", or a storage medium of energy. I'm talking about these 56 articles, 9 of which have already been edited:
Is it okay to fix the remaining 47, as well?
Thanks, and sorry for the long message (feel free to delete it if it overwhelms your talk page).
IpseCustos ( talk) 13:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
the chemical energy of food molecules and oxygen together
due to its weak double bond, oxygen contributes chemical energy
Oxygen has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. IpseCustos ( talk) 05:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. IpseCustos ( talk) 19:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
As you did here.
I know it's frustrating, but discussion is the only way (well, the only way either one of us can possibly want) to get out of this mess. Once you have arrived at a suggestion you consider to be good, I'll either agree to it or you are free to start an RfC to convince the community at large that it should be done that way.
Given the circumstances, this absolutely needs to happen on talk pages, not in the live article. Please remember the D in WP:BRD.
IpseCustos ( talk) 13:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
|
Glad to see another chemist join Wikipedia! Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry is one of several informal working-groups if you're looking for editors with interest and/or expertise in chemistry-related topics, ideas of what articles need work, etc. DMacks ( talk) 20:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Here are suggested readings: WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI. The gist of these guidelines are:
If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 14:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mass in special relativity, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Note- see also wp:Edit warring, wp:BRD, and Talk:Mass in special relativity#Dynamic mass. - DVdm ( talk) 21:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Exothermic reaction and exergonic reaction would benefit from your inspection. These articles are probably heavily consulted.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 21:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Good morning,
please express your opinion in the thread "relativistic mass" in the discussion with DVdm:
"The legitimacy of removing entries by DVdm in a topic of relativistic mass"
thank you in advance, Best Regards, RodriguesVector.
Hello, editor Klaus Schmidt-Rohr. I would be glad if you would kindly chat with me on my talk page about the definition of enthalpy. Chjoaygame ( talk) 20:50, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Klaus: you should remove your recent self-citations. Our guidelines advise against the practice, especially when the citation is to a primary source. -- Smokefoot ( talk) 01:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Just a note to tell you that I have fixed your citation for the Gislason and Craig article. You had written "ref name Gislason & Craig 2005", which the system rejected with the message "Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names". This means that the system does not allow spaces inside a ref name, and apparently reads Gislason, &, Craig and 2005 as 4 separate ref names!! AnomieBOT produced another incorrect version, so I went back to yours and just removed the spaces, and also added an = after ref name. I fixed all 3 citations to this reference, and they are correctly shown now. Dirac66 ( talk) 03:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
This is just to let you know I've reverted this edit of yours. I think I've explained why on the talk page, which is where further discussion of this, if any is required, should probably go. IpseCustos ( talk) 21:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Heat of combustion has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. IpseCustos ( talk) 16:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for continuing the discussion in various forums. While you have reverted some of my changes, I notice you haven't reverted those referring to oxygen as "high-energy", an "energy source", or a storage medium of energy. I'm talking about these 56 articles, 9 of which have already been edited:
Is it okay to fix the remaining 47, as well?
Thanks, and sorry for the long message (feel free to delete it if it overwhelms your talk page).
IpseCustos ( talk) 13:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
the chemical energy of food molecules and oxygen together
due to its weak double bond, oxygen contributes chemical energy
Oxygen has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. IpseCustos ( talk) 05:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. IpseCustos ( talk) 19:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
As you did here.
I know it's frustrating, but discussion is the only way (well, the only way either one of us can possibly want) to get out of this mess. Once you have arrived at a suggestion you consider to be good, I'll either agree to it or you are free to start an RfC to convince the community at large that it should be done that way.
Given the circumstances, this absolutely needs to happen on talk pages, not in the live article. Please remember the D in WP:BRD.
IpseCustos ( talk) 13:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,