Hello, I'm
Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Tox (protocol) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
01:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Jitsi. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
01:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Tox (protocol), you may be
blocked from editing.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
02:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Comparison of instant messaging protocols.
Cairo2k18 •
(talk) •
(contribs)
06:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
EvergreenFir
(talk)
06:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Can you please stop adding incorrect and unsourced information to articles? You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, it's very easy or even automatic to add citations if you're citing a webpage, you just need the URL. – Thjarkur (talk) 17:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
HMSLavender. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Jami (software), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
lavender|(formerly
HMSSolent)|
lambast
03:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Tox (protocol), you may be
blocked from editing.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
00:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Jami (software).
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
01:31, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
You recently
announced on the Teahouse that you are the developer of this software, whose article you are editing.
Hello, Kjgm. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Quisqualis ( talk) 07:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Tox (protocol) is developed by volunteers and is not a company or any other legal organization. Jami (software) is developed by Savoir-faire Linux. As far as I can tell, there is no "Tox,Inc", and even if there is, they do not have anything to do with these 2 articles. Please stop inserting obviously false information. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Jami (software), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
11:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
For the final time, Jami (software) is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. Tox (protocol) is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. Jitsi is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. I'm not sure if this is about getting false credit or just a joke, but either way, it has went on long enough. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
13:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1055#Kjgm
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fences&
Windows
18:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)UTRS decline
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #40945
Hello, I'm
Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Tox (protocol) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
01:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Jitsi. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
01:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Tox (protocol), you may be
blocked from editing.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
02:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Comparison of instant messaging protocols.
Cairo2k18 •
(talk) •
(contribs)
06:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
EvergreenFir
(talk)
06:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Can you please stop adding incorrect and unsourced information to articles? You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, it's very easy or even automatic to add citations if you're citing a webpage, you just need the URL. – Thjarkur (talk) 17:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
HMSLavender. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Jami (software), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
lavender|(formerly
HMSSolent)|
lambast
03:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Tox (protocol), you may be
blocked from editing.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
00:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Jami (software).
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
01:31, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
You recently
announced on the Teahouse that you are the developer of this software, whose article you are editing.
Hello, Kjgm. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Quisqualis ( talk) 07:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Tox (protocol) is developed by volunteers and is not a company or any other legal organization. Jami (software) is developed by Savoir-faire Linux. As far as I can tell, there is no "Tox,Inc", and even if there is, they do not have anything to do with these 2 articles. Please stop inserting obviously false information. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Jami (software), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
11:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
For the final time, Jami (software) is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. Tox (protocol) is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. Jitsi is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. I'm not sure if this is about getting false credit or just a joke, but either way, it has went on long enough. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
13:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1055#Kjgm
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fences&
Windows
18:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)UTRS decline
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #40945