![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your edit about the schedule of General Hospital is both wrong and misleading. While some local stations have moved the show back to 3:00pm (ET) last September, this timeslot is no longer the network's schedule for the show. Take a look at the ABC schedule grid on the link below and you will see that the sole network timeslot for GH is 2:00pm (ET)
As you can see, no mention of the 3:00 timeslot for GH on ABC's website.
The reality is that pretty much all daytime shows (eg:The Chew, The Talk, Y&R, B&B, etc) have some markets where they air at different slots than their official network ones. The soap opera press has made a huge fanfare about a few ABC stations that have decided to move GH back to 3:00pm after Katie was canceled and this had mislead some people like you to think that 3:00 (ET) is once again a network timeslot for GH. It isn't. Some stations simply chose to air GH at 3:00pm(ET) instead of 2:00pm (ET) just like some CBS stations choose to air The Talk at 3:00pm(ET) instead of 2:00pm (ET)
"Let's Make a Deal" is an exception. LMAD receives not one, but two networks feeds from CBS. In fact, LMAD is counted twice in the Nielsen ratings because of this. This is not the case with GH which is counted once in the Nielsen ratings (like all of the other daytime shows except LMAD). Basically, ABC provides the network feed for GH at 2:00 (ET) and some stations choose to rebroadcast it at a later time (such as 3:00pm (ET) for example). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.22.176.13 ( talk) 02:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Oh wow! I was honestly just thinking about that last week but I didn't know how to go about it. Archiving my talk page would really be a big help! Thank you so much!-- Nk3play2 my buzz 21:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Changing "{{Reflist|30em}}" to "{{Reflist|2}}" is not really productive. "{{Reflist|30em}}" makes the browser width determine the number of columns automaticlly, while "{{Reflist|2}}" forces only 2 columns regardless of of the browser width. This means that people width wide screens are forced to see only two columns, which adds whitespace to the page. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 04:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —
{{U|
Technical 13}} (
e •
t •
c)
06:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
John Astin may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gotham (TV series) episodes, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://series2015.com/gotham/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 18:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Gotham (TV series) episodes, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. | Naypta talk opened his mouth at 18:53, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Windows (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Hodge and Pat McNamara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Please be very careful when posting info to wikipedia as I just had to revert three of your edits for being false. You didn't read the source you provided properly. It does not state that Avery's final airdate was June 16th (as you stated on three different pages), it says that was her last day taping. Her final scenes haven't yet aired as she's clearly still on the show, everyone who watches it saw her today. Cebr1979 ( talk) 06:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your edit about the schedule of General Hospital is both wrong and misleading. While some local stations have moved the show back to 3:00pm (ET) last September, this timeslot is no longer the network's schedule for the show. Take a look at the ABC schedule grid on the link below and you will see that the sole network timeslot for GH is 2:00pm (ET)
As you can see, no mention of the 3:00 timeslot for GH on ABC's website.
The reality is that pretty much all daytime shows (eg:The Chew, The Talk, Y&R, B&B, etc) have some markets where they air at different slots than their official network ones. The soap opera press has made a huge fanfare about a few ABC stations that have decided to move GH back to 3:00pm after Katie was canceled and this had mislead some people like you to think that 3:00 (ET) is once again a network timeslot for GH. It isn't. Some stations simply chose to air GH at 3:00pm(ET) instead of 2:00pm (ET) just like some CBS stations choose to air The Talk at 3:00pm(ET) instead of 2:00pm (ET)
"Let's Make a Deal" is an exception. LMAD receives not one, but two networks feeds from CBS. In fact, LMAD is counted twice in the Nielsen ratings because of this. This is not the case with GH which is counted once in the Nielsen ratings (like all of the other daytime shows except LMAD). Basically, ABC provides the network feed for GH at 2:00 (ET) and some stations choose to rebroadcast it at a later time (such as 3:00pm (ET) for example). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.22.176.13 ( talk) 02:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Oh wow! I was honestly just thinking about that last week but I didn't know how to go about it. Archiving my talk page would really be a big help! Thank you so much!-- Nk3play2 my buzz 21:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Changing "{{Reflist|30em}}" to "{{Reflist|2}}" is not really productive. "{{Reflist|30em}}" makes the browser width determine the number of columns automaticlly, while "{{Reflist|2}}" forces only 2 columns regardless of of the browser width. This means that people width wide screens are forced to see only two columns, which adds whitespace to the page. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 04:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —
{{U|
Technical 13}} (
e •
t •
c)
06:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
John Astin may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gotham (TV series) episodes, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://series2015.com/gotham/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 18:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Gotham (TV series) episodes, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. | Naypta talk opened his mouth at 18:53, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Windows (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Hodge and Pat McNamara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Please be very careful when posting info to wikipedia as I just had to revert three of your edits for being false. You didn't read the source you provided properly. It does not state that Avery's final airdate was June 16th (as you stated on three different pages), it says that was her last day taping. Her final scenes haven't yet aired as she's clearly still on the show, everyone who watches it saw her today. Cebr1979 ( talk) 06:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)