Explain to me how this User_talk:Filll#Your_Accusations is harrassing. And tell me when I called anyone stupid. Because I didnt. The fact that you are suggesting I did shows that you didnt read what I said and/or you just believed Fill's version. Hence, I believe your hasty behaviour was also inappropriate. And as I said in Fill's talk page, I will take it to WP:DR if he doesnt cease his behaviour. [1]It was my last warning to him. Your warning was therefore redundant. Or did you miss reading that part as well? Lukas19 09:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
"The editor must have been warned with the npa2, and npa3 templates as appropriate. Reports of unwarned editors may be removed." [3] Lukas19 10:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I suggested DR on your talk page. You state above that you have warned Fills you "will take it to WP:DR if he doesnt cease his behaviour". The "must warn" info you mention and link to immediately above refers to NPA and PAIN, not DR. Two different things. One does not warn before taking to DR. Referrring to someone elses comments as "misinformed" or "incorrect" or "inaccurate" is fine. "Ignorant and stupid", in all caps, or bolded, is not fine. Discuss the content, not the contributor, does not mean calling what they say stupid. It means discuss the article. You are being highly uncivil and inflaming the situation. You are edit warring on another user's page. Do not replace warnings, ever, on another user's page. Doing so can result in a block for harassment. They have seen it. It exists in page history. There is no need to have it stay on the page if they do not wish it there. Replacing them is harassment, and violates talk page guidelines. Please let me know if this is at all unclear. KillerChihuahua ?!? 10:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Fill, regarding your comments here [8]. I find your "olive branch" unsincere, given your comment [9] which you made AFTER your "olive branch". I said it over and over that I'm offended by such comments given your previous remarks: [10] [11] Lukas19 20:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
"Or maybe we could just postulate that every scientist who agrees with you and your perfect race-detecting eyes from your position of pure white Caucasian European racial superiority and omniscience is unquestionably correct"
"As I have said over and over trying to get people like you to understand. You can sit there pleased with yourself that you are racially "pure" and you have an eagle eye for detecting those "filthy" blacks who are so different than you, but I think we all know what your agenda is. You have revealed it in ample measure here"
Stop yelling on my page. I did indeed read those posts; I have responded as I see appropriate. Do not bring up old news. If he posts what you percieve to be an insult or attack in the future please feel free to post a diff here. Do not conflate posts made in the past with current posts to decide someone is referring to you unless they specifically mention you. KillerChihuahua ?!? 20:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Stop being so biased agianst me. You are an admin. Lukas19 20:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I see that you called me a troll and advised Fill "Not feeding the trolls" [12]. Explain yourself. Lukas19 09:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I've read all the page and as I said 2 times before, I do not understand how any of the types of trolling applies to me. Lukas19 11:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
You are right. This has nothing to do with my uncivility. However, I still think that you've handled all this poorly. You've given me multiple warnings now and all you've said to Fill was to stop feeding trolls. As per your request, I will "stop pasting content from other posts with such abandon". But please read Talk:Black_people to read Fill's comments. His implications here User_talk:Wobble#Black_People and here User_talk:Doc_Tropics#Civility_warnings in connection with his remarks here [13] (the part about my "agenda") should be considered highly uncivil. I'm not even talking about his baseless accusations explained here User_talk:Filll#Your_Accusations. You also warned me about Wobble while ignoring his own behaviour. You also said I called Fill stupid. But I addressed his arguments. While this may be uncivil (I disagree. We even see diplomats using stupid.), it was still quite different than what you have claimed. Given your other claim that you "followed every link and read carefully", you should have made that distinction. Lukas19 11:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
You are still criticising me for what you percieve is my failure to warn others, yes? Criticism noted. KillerChihuahua ?!? 20:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Explain to me how this User_talk:Filll#Your_Accusations is harrassing. And tell me when I called anyone stupid. Because I didnt. The fact that you are suggesting I did shows that you didnt read what I said and/or you just believed Fill's version. Hence, I believe your hasty behaviour was also inappropriate. And as I said in Fill's talk page, I will take it to WP:DR if he doesnt cease his behaviour. [1]It was my last warning to him. Your warning was therefore redundant. Or did you miss reading that part as well? Lukas19 09:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
"The editor must have been warned with the npa2, and npa3 templates as appropriate. Reports of unwarned editors may be removed." [3] Lukas19 10:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I suggested DR on your talk page. You state above that you have warned Fills you "will take it to WP:DR if he doesnt cease his behaviour". The "must warn" info you mention and link to immediately above refers to NPA and PAIN, not DR. Two different things. One does not warn before taking to DR. Referrring to someone elses comments as "misinformed" or "incorrect" or "inaccurate" is fine. "Ignorant and stupid", in all caps, or bolded, is not fine. Discuss the content, not the contributor, does not mean calling what they say stupid. It means discuss the article. You are being highly uncivil and inflaming the situation. You are edit warring on another user's page. Do not replace warnings, ever, on another user's page. Doing so can result in a block for harassment. They have seen it. It exists in page history. There is no need to have it stay on the page if they do not wish it there. Replacing them is harassment, and violates talk page guidelines. Please let me know if this is at all unclear. KillerChihuahua ?!? 10:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Fill, regarding your comments here [8]. I find your "olive branch" unsincere, given your comment [9] which you made AFTER your "olive branch". I said it over and over that I'm offended by such comments given your previous remarks: [10] [11] Lukas19 20:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
"Or maybe we could just postulate that every scientist who agrees with you and your perfect race-detecting eyes from your position of pure white Caucasian European racial superiority and omniscience is unquestionably correct"
"As I have said over and over trying to get people like you to understand. You can sit there pleased with yourself that you are racially "pure" and you have an eagle eye for detecting those "filthy" blacks who are so different than you, but I think we all know what your agenda is. You have revealed it in ample measure here"
Stop yelling on my page. I did indeed read those posts; I have responded as I see appropriate. Do not bring up old news. If he posts what you percieve to be an insult or attack in the future please feel free to post a diff here. Do not conflate posts made in the past with current posts to decide someone is referring to you unless they specifically mention you. KillerChihuahua ?!? 20:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Stop being so biased agianst me. You are an admin. Lukas19 20:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I see that you called me a troll and advised Fill "Not feeding the trolls" [12]. Explain yourself. Lukas19 09:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I've read all the page and as I said 2 times before, I do not understand how any of the types of trolling applies to me. Lukas19 11:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
You are right. This has nothing to do with my uncivility. However, I still think that you've handled all this poorly. You've given me multiple warnings now and all you've said to Fill was to stop feeding trolls. As per your request, I will "stop pasting content from other posts with such abandon". But please read Talk:Black_people to read Fill's comments. His implications here User_talk:Wobble#Black_People and here User_talk:Doc_Tropics#Civility_warnings in connection with his remarks here [13] (the part about my "agenda") should be considered highly uncivil. I'm not even talking about his baseless accusations explained here User_talk:Filll#Your_Accusations. You also warned me about Wobble while ignoring his own behaviour. You also said I called Fill stupid. But I addressed his arguments. While this may be uncivil (I disagree. We even see diplomats using stupid.), it was still quite different than what you have claimed. Given your other claim that you "followed every link and read carefully", you should have made that distinction. Lukas19 11:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
You are still criticising me for what you percieve is my failure to warn others, yes? Criticism noted. KillerChihuahua ?!? 20:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)