Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Extreme Sport Challenges Association, and I noticed that the username you have chosen, "The Extreme Sport Challenges", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are
promotional or accounts that are
shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to
create a new account or request a
username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our
Conflict of interest guideline and
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk)
17:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
{{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
on
your user talk page.{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike | Talk 05:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 11:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I have again removed this unreferenced list. Without reliable sources anyone can add any name. Before reinstating please provide sources. Thanks.-- Egghead06 ( talk) 23:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Amie (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix ( talk) 17:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Extreme Sport Challenges Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Extreme Sport Challenges Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ceradon ( talk • contribs) 13:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Dragonfly009,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
ceradon (
talk •
contribs)
13:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Extreme Sport Challenges Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Sport Challenges Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ceradon ( talk • contribs) 20:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
If, as seems likely from your editing history, you are associated in any way with the subjects of the articles you have created or edited (e.g. on Kieran Goodwin and the charity fundraising teams etc he has participated in), you should take note of the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest policy. In particular, you should note that Wikipedia takes a very dim view of contributors who use Wikipedia for purposes of self-promotion, and for promotion of individuals and organisations with which the contributor is associated. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 21:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I did not add personal information. He knew why we were calling and the information we asked for was not personal.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kieran Goodwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Goodwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 21:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
It has been found that you have been using
one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review
the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's
userpage.
Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Mike V • Talk 01:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to remove
Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at
Kieran Goodwin, you may be
blocked from editing.
Theroadislong (
talk)
18:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Please
stop attacking other editors, as you did on
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Goodwin. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (
talk)
19:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:World Youth Organization, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Mark Arsten (
talk)
23:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Extreme Sport Challenges Association, and I noticed that the username you have chosen, "The Extreme Sport Challenges", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are
promotional or accounts that are
shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to
create a new account or request a
username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our
Conflict of interest guideline and
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk)
17:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
{{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
on
your user talk page.{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike | Talk 05:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 11:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I have again removed this unreferenced list. Without reliable sources anyone can add any name. Before reinstating please provide sources. Thanks.-- Egghead06 ( talk) 23:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Amie (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix ( talk) 17:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Extreme Sport Challenges Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Extreme Sport Challenges Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ceradon ( talk • contribs) 13:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Dragonfly009,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
ceradon (
talk •
contribs)
13:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Extreme Sport Challenges Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Sport Challenges Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ceradon ( talk • contribs) 20:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
If, as seems likely from your editing history, you are associated in any way with the subjects of the articles you have created or edited (e.g. on Kieran Goodwin and the charity fundraising teams etc he has participated in), you should take note of the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest policy. In particular, you should note that Wikipedia takes a very dim view of contributors who use Wikipedia for purposes of self-promotion, and for promotion of individuals and organisations with which the contributor is associated. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 21:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I did not add personal information. He knew why we were calling and the information we asked for was not personal.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kieran Goodwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Goodwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 21:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
It has been found that you have been using
one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review
the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's
userpage.
Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Mike V • Talk 01:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to remove
Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at
Kieran Goodwin, you may be
blocked from editing.
Theroadislong (
talk)
18:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Please
stop attacking other editors, as you did on
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Goodwin. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (
talk)
19:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:World Youth Organization, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Mark Arsten (
talk)
23:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)