←Archive 5 ( 201 - 250) | Khukri's talk archive 6 (251 - 300). Please do not modify | Archive 7 ( 301 - 350)→ |
I'm honored that you thought of me. Standing for RFA before is something I have gone a bit back and forth on. I'm going to read and think a bit, but I believe I'm ready to take the plunge. Thank you again!-- Kubigula ( talk) 18:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I just realized that the "Shad Valley" page had been speedy-deleted under the code db-corp. Is there some way that I could have another go at this page, starting from the previous text and adding in some documentation for notability?
As you can see, I'm a relatively inexperienced editor, so any help would be gratefully received. Lmallory 04:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Well things are great at the tab wiki, I have become an admin with another user. But we still have our Internet troll/Sockpuppet i blocked them I would have blocked the users for more time except i don't know. It says IP Address/username: Expiry: 24 hours and Reason: I want to know how to block them for more time, Would i put it in minutes,hours,days or years and how do i block users Indefinitely. I am asking you cause i think polices are the same here as over there(not that are policies are written down or i just can't find them). Thank you and Cheers oysterguitarist~ Talk 23:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for answering that, the bloking policy didn't cover it that well and thanks for answering all my questions it's appreciated. Cheers oysterguitarist~ Talk 23:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey Khukri, thanks for making my Wiki-day with that barnstar that I never even knew existed. And congrats on becoming an admin! --( Review Me) R Parlate Contribs @(Let's Go Yankees!) 11:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I have a possible sockpupppet he left a message on my talk page [1] and did not sign his post seen here [2] saying i warned him about an edit he made. Except i never warned him before seen here [3] and he never made an edit to that artical seen here [4]. I appologized then i realized this. What do i do? oysterguitarist~ Talk 17:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
...for your help, kind words and nomination. I very much appreciate your support, and I will try not to block Jimbo Wales as my first admin action.
Obviously, I have a lot to learn about the new tools. However, I meant what I said about being willing to help out as needed. So, please feel free to drop me a line if you are working any backlogs and need an extra set of hands/eyes/buttons. Putting in some time at Wikipedia:WikiProject user warnings/Overview is already on my list.-- Kubigula ( talk) 16:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Khukri. I hope everything is alright. I need your help. I accidentally pressed (rev) button in the image page. I thought it was (review) button. Is it possible to undid my mistake? or should we upload the image? I shall greatly appreciate your help. Best wishes. E104421 18:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, six of my articles have put up by AfD by the same person and are being voted on all by the same persons.. I was wondering if you could look the articles over and the things written on the discussion pages and give me your honest answer as to should they be up for vote or am I being paranoid? The articles are:
Last week I lost one of my articles and I thought it was a good faith AfD but now with six more up for vote this week I think there is more behind these AfD then good faith. Callelinea 13:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Are song lyrics copyright violations? Oyster guitarist 21:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your reminder and I now understand why you revert my edit. It's because all the UW templates weren't yet available in Chinese Wiki, and I'm now translating them. I will give the inter-lang links after I finish all the templates in Chinese WP. Sorry if I waste your time. -- Lkopeter 15:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Wow thanks so much =) That's really made my day! It's been great to learn about Wikipedia, how it works and the policies that are in place and I was hoping I was doing it all properly and I guess that's my answer! So thanks! SMC89 13:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Khuri, and thanks for blocking User:Nate1501. I believe him to be a sockpuppet and I reported him here; did I do this correctly, and do I need to tag his userpages or change my report in any way? Luckily, I haven't had to do this before so it's my first time with a sockpuppet report. Thanks for your help! Eliz81 15:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking User:74.140.243.143. Angel Of Sadness T/ C 23:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up, I was wondering why that IP was on there since it hadn't been warned since the 9th. Anyway, I'll probably stay out of it if it's a content thing. Peace, delldot talk 11:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
...for the block on 71.182.146.121. I am new here, and was trying to keep up with reverting its nonsense while speed-reading my way through the admin intervention stuff to figure out how to report properly. Appreciate the help :) Maralia 17:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Alright, thanks for letting me know. I've seen reports there before, so I just figured that's where it went. Cheers, The Hyb rid 08:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Khukri,
A short while ago, you processed a block for 86.136.133.15. This individual has been vandalizing Simpsons-related pages for a month now, using many different IP addresses through British Telecom. An abuse report has been filed, and another user has been logging the vandal's actions. The vandal strikes daily, and there are three of us, User:Gran2, User:Scorpion0422 and myself, who watch for and revert his changes, when his vandalism pattern emerges. He claims to be an eleven-year-old boy.
One admin has said there's little we can do about it, other than to file a new WP:AIV each time he strikes. But it's getting tiring, following him around and reverting changes every single day.
I mailed abuse@btbroadband.com, with links to the abuse report and the user log, asking if there's anything they can do to stop the ongoing vandalism. However, BT says they'd need server logs in order to track down the offending user.
Is there any way to acquire the server logs for our vandal's visits, to assist BT in tracking down and, hopefully, putting an end to the vandalism? Do you have any suggestions, other than following him around every single day?
Thanks... - FeralDruid 10:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Well, I had noticed that entry sat on AIV for a long time before anyone did anything, or more accurately while no one did anything. I guess the fact that there were no warnings and the contribution history was rather minimal, plus the amount of time it takes to refamiliarize yourself with the case, was deterring most admins from taking action. (Once you do, there's no doubt). Daniel Case 14:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Would appreciate your assistance with an edit war I have come across at Optimus Prime and Megatron. I am unsure how to report it, as the issues range from image/copyright to blatant 3RR skirting. Thanks for any help you can provide, especially if it includes advice for how to handle in the future :) Maralia 20:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the reminder, though I have a question. Would advertising be grounds for an initial blatant vandal template? †Ðanieltiger45† Talk to meas 14:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
The ip you just blocked, 201.67.224.147 ( talk · contribs) has created an account and has made the same edits. The account is Truesalomon ( talk · contribs). IPSOS ( talk) 14:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Now back with a new IP address, 201.34.190.163 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). I've requested semi-protection at WP:RFP. IPSOS ( talk) 15:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. I'll check the box. Normally, I don't leave an edit comment only for extremely minor edits, such as fixing the capitalization of headings. I mark those minor. Should I use an edit comment even for things like that? IPSOS ( talk) 15:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
As 201.41.224.91 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and vandalizing IPSOS ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). IPSOS ( talk) 15:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Khukri. Yesterday you helped with a 24-hour IP block of a vandal. This guy has been changing his IP address for the last three months and sporadically vandalizing Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). In the last week he has vandalized it a dozen times with several different IPs. It's always the same thing, new address. Now he is at 68.76.122.18 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and vandalizing Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Can we possibly protect that page? Thanks very much, Nimur 16:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Is there an editor who is anti-atheist, who was encountered by you and IPSOS, who may feel hostile to you? User:Atheismfailed recently added a link to the Atheism article (warning; have popup blocker enabled) which leads me to wonder if this is worth checking into. Thanks much! (Note: also posted this to IPSOS' talk page) KillerChihuahua ?!? 00:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted your terrible removal :). --( Review Me) R Parlate Contribs @ (Let's Go Yankees!) 03:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello there,
I noticed that you mentioned writing or rehashing an essay on how to use an escalating scale of warnings on vandals/new users/etc. I may not be an admin, but I'm hardly new on Wiki, and I'd quite like to flex my fingers and type an essay. I understand that I can do so anyway, but do you mind if I try to synthesize your points and those of the other commentators on the Admin's Noticeboard talk pages into a cohesive essay? I'd like your sanction. Thanks.
Have a nice day,
The Rhymesmith 09:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, an editor made an incorrect move, but for some reason I can't reverse it. I've put a db-move on the redirect, but sometimes these take a while. The redirect needing deletion is at Boudhanath. IPSOS ( talk) 17:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
This user just doesn't appear to be able to learn. I've left a very sternly worded last message. The Evil Spartan 16:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 13:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Article parameter in the documentation is not used by the template. It's discussed at Wikipedia:Help desk#template uw-editsummary problem. PrimeHunter 14:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Should I do anything about this or just leave it alone? Oyster guitarist 02:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you recently blocked User:139.133.7.38 for 3 months. This is an address that apparently is one of the main proxies for the University of Aberdeen (one of their IT people stopped by the Wikipedia IRC channel). Generally blocking shared IP addresses for longer than the last burst of vandalism lasted, is not helpful. Often vandals get bored quickly, and it deters legitimate users (if the vandal doesn't get bored and the block expires, then it takes a few seconds for someone to reblock).
As the blocking policy says, generally we try to make blocks on shared addresses shorter. I unblocked in this particular case; we'll see if the contributions stay mostly positive. -- Pak aran 17:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Mostly I am simply demanding citations and deleting the more outrageous of the unreferenced material. I am not really "working" on the article. But I am watching it. Blueboar 17:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I was the user who had reported Movieman for vandalism, and I feel that your assessment of his warning was incorrect. The report of vandalism was not in regard to his past edits, but to the edits made immediately following his unblocking on 21 Aug. Just one look at his contribs reveals endless vandalism and total disregard for wikipedia and its users. Following your posting, another user warned him for vandalizing yet another page. I respectfully request that you re-assess this user's history, and possibly reconsider your decision to remove his block. Thank you for your time. With best regards, Neo16287 06:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you deleted this page, and I was wondering why. Sorry if this isn't the correct forum/format for this question. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.49.104 ( talk) 20:49, August 26, 2007 (UTC)
Hi. You just declined to block User:The Immortal Lord as no warnings had been given; however, as this account is obviously a sock of User:Disturbedrcool1 (it's making exactly the same edit as the two already blocked socks), who was repeatedly warned, I don't see this as consistent with the WP:SOCK policy that "accounts operating in violation of this policy should be blocked indefinitely." Anyway, I've brought this up at WP:ANI. Cheers -- Pak21 10:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know; I wasn't aware that such templates are frowned upon. You're absolutely correct -- I hardly ever find use for it, and I've put in a CSD for it. Thanks again, and cheers! -- Ratiocinate ( t • c) 13:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
You left a message to my IP address, and I am not responsible for that edit. I did not even know of that page until it was mentioned to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.238.217.216 ( talk) 07:28, August 29, 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the note! I appreciate the info... Dreadstar † 09:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support at my RFA, but the one you just added is your second support. Cheers all the same -- Anonymous Dissident Talk 23:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your continuing efforts to fight vandalism, I award you this barnstar. -- Shark face 217 04:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
Hello. Sorry about that wasn't aware. Have posted a few like that. What does need to be posted then, just the fact its repeated vandalism ? Cheers Hammer1980 17:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Khukri,
Thank you for your participation in
my RFA, which closed successfully with 55 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to vote in my nomination. I'm a new admin, so if you have any suggestions feel free to let me know. I would like to give a special shout out to
Fang Aili,
Phaedriel, and
Anonymous Dissident, for their co-nominations. Thank you all!
Credits This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor's modification of Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
Thanks for your support, I took the easy way out of thanking everyone by borrowing someone else's design...but know that I sincerely appreciate your support and confidence in me! Dreadstar † 04:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Understood. Thanks for the tip! Spryde 12:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
This user's posts! -- Endless Dan 13:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the {{ indefblocked}} tag that you put on the page, this should only be done by an admin, and the user has not been blocked. All of the vandalism was reverted, if this user is a problem issue with the relevant warnings and then report to WP:AIV. Oh and thanks for the reverting to my talk page. Thanks Khu kri 13:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi... thanks for the note. I noticed that just after I submitted it: it was a mistake. I'm undercaffeinated. :) -- Rrburke( talk) 13:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying to that editor on AIV! (Oh I'll add that I posted my comment right after you saying to come to talk (edit conflict). Phgao 11:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
←Archive 5 ( 201 - 250) | Khukri's talk archive 6 (251 - 300). Please do not modify | Archive 7 ( 301 - 350)→ |
I'm honored that you thought of me. Standing for RFA before is something I have gone a bit back and forth on. I'm going to read and think a bit, but I believe I'm ready to take the plunge. Thank you again!-- Kubigula ( talk) 18:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I just realized that the "Shad Valley" page had been speedy-deleted under the code db-corp. Is there some way that I could have another go at this page, starting from the previous text and adding in some documentation for notability?
As you can see, I'm a relatively inexperienced editor, so any help would be gratefully received. Lmallory 04:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Well things are great at the tab wiki, I have become an admin with another user. But we still have our Internet troll/Sockpuppet i blocked them I would have blocked the users for more time except i don't know. It says IP Address/username: Expiry: 24 hours and Reason: I want to know how to block them for more time, Would i put it in minutes,hours,days or years and how do i block users Indefinitely. I am asking you cause i think polices are the same here as over there(not that are policies are written down or i just can't find them). Thank you and Cheers oysterguitarist~ Talk 23:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for answering that, the bloking policy didn't cover it that well and thanks for answering all my questions it's appreciated. Cheers oysterguitarist~ Talk 23:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey Khukri, thanks for making my Wiki-day with that barnstar that I never even knew existed. And congrats on becoming an admin! --( Review Me) R Parlate Contribs @(Let's Go Yankees!) 11:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I have a possible sockpupppet he left a message on my talk page [1] and did not sign his post seen here [2] saying i warned him about an edit he made. Except i never warned him before seen here [3] and he never made an edit to that artical seen here [4]. I appologized then i realized this. What do i do? oysterguitarist~ Talk 17:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
...for your help, kind words and nomination. I very much appreciate your support, and I will try not to block Jimbo Wales as my first admin action.
Obviously, I have a lot to learn about the new tools. However, I meant what I said about being willing to help out as needed. So, please feel free to drop me a line if you are working any backlogs and need an extra set of hands/eyes/buttons. Putting in some time at Wikipedia:WikiProject user warnings/Overview is already on my list.-- Kubigula ( talk) 16:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Khukri. I hope everything is alright. I need your help. I accidentally pressed (rev) button in the image page. I thought it was (review) button. Is it possible to undid my mistake? or should we upload the image? I shall greatly appreciate your help. Best wishes. E104421 18:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, six of my articles have put up by AfD by the same person and are being voted on all by the same persons.. I was wondering if you could look the articles over and the things written on the discussion pages and give me your honest answer as to should they be up for vote or am I being paranoid? The articles are:
Last week I lost one of my articles and I thought it was a good faith AfD but now with six more up for vote this week I think there is more behind these AfD then good faith. Callelinea 13:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Are song lyrics copyright violations? Oyster guitarist 21:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your reminder and I now understand why you revert my edit. It's because all the UW templates weren't yet available in Chinese Wiki, and I'm now translating them. I will give the inter-lang links after I finish all the templates in Chinese WP. Sorry if I waste your time. -- Lkopeter 15:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Wow thanks so much =) That's really made my day! It's been great to learn about Wikipedia, how it works and the policies that are in place and I was hoping I was doing it all properly and I guess that's my answer! So thanks! SMC89 13:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Khuri, and thanks for blocking User:Nate1501. I believe him to be a sockpuppet and I reported him here; did I do this correctly, and do I need to tag his userpages or change my report in any way? Luckily, I haven't had to do this before so it's my first time with a sockpuppet report. Thanks for your help! Eliz81 15:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking User:74.140.243.143. Angel Of Sadness T/ C 23:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up, I was wondering why that IP was on there since it hadn't been warned since the 9th. Anyway, I'll probably stay out of it if it's a content thing. Peace, delldot talk 11:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
...for the block on 71.182.146.121. I am new here, and was trying to keep up with reverting its nonsense while speed-reading my way through the admin intervention stuff to figure out how to report properly. Appreciate the help :) Maralia 17:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Alright, thanks for letting me know. I've seen reports there before, so I just figured that's where it went. Cheers, The Hyb rid 08:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Khukri,
A short while ago, you processed a block for 86.136.133.15. This individual has been vandalizing Simpsons-related pages for a month now, using many different IP addresses through British Telecom. An abuse report has been filed, and another user has been logging the vandal's actions. The vandal strikes daily, and there are three of us, User:Gran2, User:Scorpion0422 and myself, who watch for and revert his changes, when his vandalism pattern emerges. He claims to be an eleven-year-old boy.
One admin has said there's little we can do about it, other than to file a new WP:AIV each time he strikes. But it's getting tiring, following him around and reverting changes every single day.
I mailed abuse@btbroadband.com, with links to the abuse report and the user log, asking if there's anything they can do to stop the ongoing vandalism. However, BT says they'd need server logs in order to track down the offending user.
Is there any way to acquire the server logs for our vandal's visits, to assist BT in tracking down and, hopefully, putting an end to the vandalism? Do you have any suggestions, other than following him around every single day?
Thanks... - FeralDruid 10:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Well, I had noticed that entry sat on AIV for a long time before anyone did anything, or more accurately while no one did anything. I guess the fact that there were no warnings and the contribution history was rather minimal, plus the amount of time it takes to refamiliarize yourself with the case, was deterring most admins from taking action. (Once you do, there's no doubt). Daniel Case 14:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Would appreciate your assistance with an edit war I have come across at Optimus Prime and Megatron. I am unsure how to report it, as the issues range from image/copyright to blatant 3RR skirting. Thanks for any help you can provide, especially if it includes advice for how to handle in the future :) Maralia 20:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the reminder, though I have a question. Would advertising be grounds for an initial blatant vandal template? †Ðanieltiger45† Talk to meas 14:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
The ip you just blocked, 201.67.224.147 ( talk · contribs) has created an account and has made the same edits. The account is Truesalomon ( talk · contribs). IPSOS ( talk) 14:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Now back with a new IP address, 201.34.190.163 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). I've requested semi-protection at WP:RFP. IPSOS ( talk) 15:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. I'll check the box. Normally, I don't leave an edit comment only for extremely minor edits, such as fixing the capitalization of headings. I mark those minor. Should I use an edit comment even for things like that? IPSOS ( talk) 15:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
As 201.41.224.91 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and vandalizing IPSOS ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). IPSOS ( talk) 15:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Khukri. Yesterday you helped with a 24-hour IP block of a vandal. This guy has been changing his IP address for the last three months and sporadically vandalizing Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). In the last week he has vandalized it a dozen times with several different IPs. It's always the same thing, new address. Now he is at 68.76.122.18 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and vandalizing Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Can we possibly protect that page? Thanks very much, Nimur 16:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Is there an editor who is anti-atheist, who was encountered by you and IPSOS, who may feel hostile to you? User:Atheismfailed recently added a link to the Atheism article (warning; have popup blocker enabled) which leads me to wonder if this is worth checking into. Thanks much! (Note: also posted this to IPSOS' talk page) KillerChihuahua ?!? 00:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted your terrible removal :). --( Review Me) R Parlate Contribs @ (Let's Go Yankees!) 03:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello there,
I noticed that you mentioned writing or rehashing an essay on how to use an escalating scale of warnings on vandals/new users/etc. I may not be an admin, but I'm hardly new on Wiki, and I'd quite like to flex my fingers and type an essay. I understand that I can do so anyway, but do you mind if I try to synthesize your points and those of the other commentators on the Admin's Noticeboard talk pages into a cohesive essay? I'd like your sanction. Thanks.
Have a nice day,
The Rhymesmith 09:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, an editor made an incorrect move, but for some reason I can't reverse it. I've put a db-move on the redirect, but sometimes these take a while. The redirect needing deletion is at Boudhanath. IPSOS ( talk) 17:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
This user just doesn't appear to be able to learn. I've left a very sternly worded last message. The Evil Spartan 16:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 13:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Article parameter in the documentation is not used by the template. It's discussed at Wikipedia:Help desk#template uw-editsummary problem. PrimeHunter 14:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Should I do anything about this or just leave it alone? Oyster guitarist 02:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you recently blocked User:139.133.7.38 for 3 months. This is an address that apparently is one of the main proxies for the University of Aberdeen (one of their IT people stopped by the Wikipedia IRC channel). Generally blocking shared IP addresses for longer than the last burst of vandalism lasted, is not helpful. Often vandals get bored quickly, and it deters legitimate users (if the vandal doesn't get bored and the block expires, then it takes a few seconds for someone to reblock).
As the blocking policy says, generally we try to make blocks on shared addresses shorter. I unblocked in this particular case; we'll see if the contributions stay mostly positive. -- Pak aran 17:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Mostly I am simply demanding citations and deleting the more outrageous of the unreferenced material. I am not really "working" on the article. But I am watching it. Blueboar 17:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I was the user who had reported Movieman for vandalism, and I feel that your assessment of his warning was incorrect. The report of vandalism was not in regard to his past edits, but to the edits made immediately following his unblocking on 21 Aug. Just one look at his contribs reveals endless vandalism and total disregard for wikipedia and its users. Following your posting, another user warned him for vandalizing yet another page. I respectfully request that you re-assess this user's history, and possibly reconsider your decision to remove his block. Thank you for your time. With best regards, Neo16287 06:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you deleted this page, and I was wondering why. Sorry if this isn't the correct forum/format for this question. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.49.104 ( talk) 20:49, August 26, 2007 (UTC)
Hi. You just declined to block User:The Immortal Lord as no warnings had been given; however, as this account is obviously a sock of User:Disturbedrcool1 (it's making exactly the same edit as the two already blocked socks), who was repeatedly warned, I don't see this as consistent with the WP:SOCK policy that "accounts operating in violation of this policy should be blocked indefinitely." Anyway, I've brought this up at WP:ANI. Cheers -- Pak21 10:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know; I wasn't aware that such templates are frowned upon. You're absolutely correct -- I hardly ever find use for it, and I've put in a CSD for it. Thanks again, and cheers! -- Ratiocinate ( t • c) 13:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
You left a message to my IP address, and I am not responsible for that edit. I did not even know of that page until it was mentioned to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.238.217.216 ( talk) 07:28, August 29, 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the note! I appreciate the info... Dreadstar † 09:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support at my RFA, but the one you just added is your second support. Cheers all the same -- Anonymous Dissident Talk 23:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your continuing efforts to fight vandalism, I award you this barnstar. -- Shark face 217 04:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
Hello. Sorry about that wasn't aware. Have posted a few like that. What does need to be posted then, just the fact its repeated vandalism ? Cheers Hammer1980 17:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Khukri,
Thank you for your participation in
my RFA, which closed successfully with 55 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to vote in my nomination. I'm a new admin, so if you have any suggestions feel free to let me know. I would like to give a special shout out to
Fang Aili,
Phaedriel, and
Anonymous Dissident, for their co-nominations. Thank you all!
Credits This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor's modification of Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
Thanks for your support, I took the easy way out of thanking everyone by borrowing someone else's design...but know that I sincerely appreciate your support and confidence in me! Dreadstar † 04:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Understood. Thanks for the tip! Spryde 12:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
This user's posts! -- Endless Dan 13:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the {{ indefblocked}} tag that you put on the page, this should only be done by an admin, and the user has not been blocked. All of the vandalism was reverted, if this user is a problem issue with the relevant warnings and then report to WP:AIV. Oh and thanks for the reverting to my talk page. Thanks Khu kri 13:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi... thanks for the note. I noticed that just after I submitted it: it was a mistake. I'm undercaffeinated. :) -- Rrburke( talk) 13:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying to that editor on AIV! (Oh I'll add that I posted my comment right after you saying to come to talk (edit conflict). Phgao 11:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)