←Archive 2 ( 51 - 100) | Khukri's talk archive 3 (101 - 150). Please do not modify | Archive 4 ( 151 - 200)→ |
Hmm. I see what you mean. Nope, I just goofed it up, I guess. Duh. Thanks for nailing him/her/it. Gzuckier 13:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey there! You may wanna pop by Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings, see if your ideas would fit in there. If you have already, disregard my suggestion :) -- Sagaciousuk ( talk) 14:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I have responded here: [1]. Thanks for taking initiative on this. Kukini 15:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Khukri! Yes, excellent idea. I'll try to look at it more later when I'm home from work (and after the bottle of wine that I know that needs emptying, is indeed emptied, lol). While RC-patrolling one of my frustrations was needing to reach for a template that fit an exact situation, and not finding one, or finding one where the wording was wrong: either too harsh, or not quite to the point. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Yeh, sorry about that. So you are revamping all the warnings? Sounds interesting. Hmm, don't know why my bot edited it, should've skipped it. If it happens again tell me, hopefully it shouldn't.-- Andeh 14:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
With user warnings, I have a thing in my monobook that shows up some buttons to automatically instert templates when editing a users talk page. -- A dam1213 Talk + 08:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand ( talk • contribs • Bot) 19:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I will most certainly give out the templates, however as I am not an active RC patroller, I won't be searching thru the warners; instead, I'll use WP:AIV, look at the people who are recently-warning the vandals listed, then do it. I'll check AIV probably every 20-30mins, to spam all the warners from the new entries. Cheers, Daniel . Bryant 09:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, Khukri - you've got me into a good WikiProject there! SunStar Net 11:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your message. Are these warnings available to look at? If they are what is the page? Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 11:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
just got a message about how i edited an article on osmosis. im here to clarify that not only do our IPs not match whatsoever, that i also dont know anyone by the name of Ed!
edit: i can now see the IP history and it seems that, while ive worked on other articles, im using the vandals IP address. i suppose i should use an account then —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.8.126 ( talk • contribs)
Hi - thanks for the info and the links -- I'll take a look at it later :) M a rtinp23 14:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I noted that you gave the above editor a final warning for vandalism some time ago. Please note his recent vandalism to the article Kitten. I will revert the vandalism as soon as I am through sending this message to you. Thank you. Badbilltucker 14:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!!! -- M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ( T | C | @) 14:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for that information Khukri, much appreciated. I'll check out the links tomorrow (tis getting late here in Aus:)). Cheers, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 14:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thanks but I had it under control Betacommand ( talk • contribs • Bot) 15:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I'll get right on that. From your messages here, it looks like you've been spreading the word, too!
It's awesome that the standardization is moving along so nicely.
Have a good day, sir! :)
Srose (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me about the project. I know it's brand new but I have to say that, although I do know about test templates and such, I found the discussions impossible to navigate or, in most cases, even comprehend. For instance, the harmonisation page starts with a very cryptic vote. I hope I'm not sounding too rash or overly-critical here, it's really not my intention: I think it's a great initiative and would like to get involved to some extent but right now I can't because, well, I just don't understand what's what in the project pages. Pascal.Tesson 16:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
You deleted my entry for 'fomp' because it qualified as a dictionary term? In all actuality I specifically added that it had no place in a dictionary as it was a questionable word with multiple meanings and a background. You deleted it much too soon and without hesitation. -- Icedevil6 21:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
On behalf of the Southwest School Corperation, I am sorry for my fellow classmates' vandalization of Wikipedia. I will tell our technology cooridinator about this problem. Please contact the school corperation offices at http://www.swest.k12.in.us/ if further problems arise.
You have a reply waiting for you at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Admin coaching The Transhumanist 18:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Slave codes. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 21:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Ahhh ,,, I don't edit *any* Wikipedia articles (OK, maybe I correct a typo or two). I will occasionally leave comments in "Talk" and people can listen to them or not as they please. I don't recall even *reading* the slave codes article. What was posted?
Is someone impersonating me? I wrote an online US Civil War history that was not entirely flattering to the Southern Confederacy and there could be a motive for targeting me.
Comments would be appreciated. If no comments are forthcoming, then simply remember that any vandalism to Wikipedia articles is not coming from me. MrG (Greg Goebel)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.227.254.109 ( talk • contribs)
I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae' blis 23:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I must admit that I was quite disappointed to see that you withdrew; whilst additional criticism apropos of your perceived lack of substantive mainspace contributions may perhaps have betided, I don't think it to have been clear that your request would have been unsuccessful. For my part, I was altogether happy to see a candidate for adminship who seemed well to understand what qualities are rather auspicious in a prospective admin, and I think your replies to Oleg and me, inter al., evidenced the sound judgment and deliberative temperament for which most users look in a candidate for adminship (which judgment, I suppose, was also demonstrated by your withdrawal, to the extent that such withdrawal sought to prevent the community from having to partake of an RfA that was ostensibly [at least in the views of some] destined to produce no consensus). I cannot imagine that the net effect on the project of your becoming an admin would have been other-than-positive, and so I think it fair to say that the net effect of your withdrawal is negative. Best of wishes in any event... :) Joe 22:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Could you clarify why you chose delete instead of Transwikification? The transwikification won't have any ill effects on the quality of the pike article and still removes the material from Wikipedia while putting it where it belongs (on WikiBooks). - Mgm| (talk) 11:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
I must say that I also was sorry to see you withdraw so quickly. RfA's certainly do have a tendency to snowball, and it is a shame when it happens to good editors. Despite the objections those who opposed your RfA, I hope you consider running again when the time is right. I am very impressed with your work and you obviously possess the demeanor and level-headedness that I look for in an admin. When the time comes, I would even be happy to nominate you, as I feel strongly that your RfA should have passed this time. -- Renesis ( talk) 19:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC) P.S. When I have a minute I will be working on the spam UWT's, and I would be happy to take care of any editing of the protected templates that you need. Just let me know.
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
For your efforts to help new users and encouragements. E104421 22:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
Hey, I see you seem to sort-of-run Wikipedia:Wikiproject user warnings. I would like to propose a standard for all user warnings -- can you point me to the preferred place to do that? Thanks, tgies 06:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Are you ready to get started?
The waiting time over at Admin coaching is long (some people have been waiting in line since July). I'm an admin coach with the project, and for my students I set up a group discussion page so that we could all learn from each other. The scope of this concept has expanded into the Virtual classroom, which is an open forum for the teaching and learning of advanced Wikipedia skills.
Anyone and everyone is welcome to participate, as a student, as a coach, or both. Every week or two a new major topic of discussion or classroom assignment is introduced, usually with a guest writer who presents his or her expertise on the current subject and who remains on hand to answer questions. Everyone is encouraged to participate in the discussions, such as sharing your expertise, asking and answering questions, etc.
The current topic of discussion is vandalism, and our guest writer is Budgiekiller.
All discussions are open-ended, so all previous discussion topics and classroom assignments are still there for viewing and further participation. There are also sections for posting miscellaneous topics and questions, requesting coaching assistance, etc.
In addition to inviting those who would like to learn, I routinely invite experts from all over Wikipedia to come and contribute for the benefit of all. The VC is rapidly turning into a clearing house of the best resources, methods, and techniques known for working on Wikipedia.
You are cordially invited to participate.
Here's an announcement box which you can place on your userpage or at the top of your talk page for keeping up to date with classroom assignments.
I hope to see you there. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 08:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't vandalising it, I wanted to put a deletion tag on it, I don't know how to as it has been nominated before. Can you help me? 86.20.53.195 18:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Khukri. According to our request page, you are at or near the top of the list. Would you still like a coach? If so I will match you with one. Please let me know. Thanks! -- Fang Aili talk 18:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Saw it and blocked immediately :) Thanks for letting me know anyway Glen 19:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm want you to know that if this user keeps it up with his lies about me on his user/discussion page and you continue to condone it I will resort to Legal action to solve the problem. The guy is a political hack for the mayor of Reading, PA, and is resorting to character smears. This does not belong on Wikipedia, and he needs to take it elsewhere. Thank You. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mheckman1978 ( talk • contribs) 02:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC).
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page.Your Patrols have been very good.It is due to people like that Wikipedia goes on.Keep it up and thank you.
1:There is a page called Periyar Ramasami .Here It is potentially libellous allegations without any any citations which I have asked for.The wording are not encyclopedic. Periyar being likened to Hitler is potentially libellous as Hitler was responsible for millions of deaths whereas Periyar was not guilty or accused of even one. Please go through this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periyar_Ramasami#Leader_of_Dravidar_Kazhagam Can I remove comments like those ? This Page has been vandalised many times the last one by
2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hereditary_Education_Policy This has been vandalised by the same person from 3 IP address
Please refer to this http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Harlowraman&diff=94068203&oldid=94063562 The user wants the page deleted.I requested the user to do Positive edit and he wants Government relating to documents from 1952 now all government documents,Cabinet decisions of all policies taken prior to the Computer/internet era are not available online and worldwide and you can check the government site http://www.tn.gov.in/government.htm . I requested him to Please do a positive edit by describing your point of view regarfor this http://www.tn.gov.in/government.htm ding the Educational system reforms of Rajaji between 1952-1954 and not Negative edits ie by removing content as it has been done 6 timesbut even today it was vandalised.Please help
can I have this page protected ? Thanks again for your help. Harlowraman 17:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey man,
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Nice to see somebody on the ball even when I'm sound asleep. Maybe we'll run across each other in the future, since I do RC patrol, too. =) Have a great rest of your day! – Lantoka ( talk) 18:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
The previous entry on Blasted which I amended was, I think the work of a rather naive a-level student. Did you read it? It was naive and laughable. I think Sarah Kane and Wikipedia are worth rather more. It was also out of keeping with your other entries on her work. A very lengthy and not very accurate plot description. Feeble and inaccurate character analysis. A dimwitted attempt at summing up the 'meaning' of the play. This is not just my view. Read anything else that has been published about her. And compare it with this entry. I happen to think Sarah Kane is worth more. But keep it as it is, if you want. You just make Wikipedia look stupid, that's all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.70.138 ( talk • contribs)
My dear Khukri.
I'm terribly sorry to have offended you in any way.
I'm sure you're terribly over-worked.
My criticism was of the previous entry.
Not of you.
Why should I?
I don't know you.
By the way, the word is 'tenets' (of Wikipedia), not 'tenants' who are people who rent houses.
Lots of love and best wishes.
And do excuse me for having upset you.
It's hard life, isn't it?
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.141.70.138 (
talk •
contribs)
hey, srry idk who u are but i acidently deleted some info. om memory........srry again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.165.161.180 ( talk • contribs)
hi how do i creat a brand new page?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.134.206.95 ( talk • contribs)
Suggest you start here. Regards Khukri ( talk . contribs) 23:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting my vandalized userpage. [2] :-) ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 16:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
My edits on Joshua are legitimate. I'm moving the etymology section to the bottom of the page, as should be done. 71.76.219.92 22:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.
Thanks! -- Vox Causa 22:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reminding me about that project. I will take a better look at it when I am not falling asleep (late here). Best, Kukini 08:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Khukri,
Thank you for your message. I am a student and the change is a part of major reorganization of the topic under law school faculty supervision. The topic is to be further developed and I hope it might become a good contribution to the project. Please do not revert the changes, if you feel that the provided information is not accurate, may you please contact me?
Thank you.
Sincerely, Osghall —Preceding unsigned comment added by Osghall ( talk • contribs)
I have replied to you on my talk page. This message is in case you don't have my talk page on your watchlist, or you are an IP who doesn't have a watchlist. T e ckWiz Talk Contribs @
Make templates for redlinks? is that the idea? Anyplace in particular you want attention, or did you want to assign me a chunk? KillerChihuahua ?!? 15:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
I deleted the section on Misandry in Literature because I've proven that at least one of the quotes from the Fatherhood Coalition is taken so far out of context that it seems to say the opposite of what it originally meant. I doubt this is unintentional. The Misandry in Literature section consists of quotes from the Fatherhood Coalition, so the whole thing is suspect. It's not NPOV and it's not good research. Please note the discussion on the talk page. 06:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.118.65.208 ( talk • contribs)
This is from the guy who was vandalising "Ben 10's" page: I am Ben 10. I just don't bother to log on most of the time. I will do so more often now to avoid confusion. I was trying to get rid of a glitch with my User Boxes. ( Ben 10) 16:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Can you look into (and past the really stinko template that began the discussion complete with tfd talk) the discussion on
User talk:Fabartus/Wet noodle award which is aimed more at editor reminders, vice problem edit policing. You've attracted some significant talent there, and I'd appreciate it if you'd all consider attacking unnecessary time waste into your integration edits.
Since this was somewhat off to the side of your main focus, I thought you should consider whether a link be made to your project pages. Thanks //
Fra
nkB
16:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the entry for Napa Chic. A user named User:Calton keeps wanting to delete it. I think he is just being weird about it. All very odd, but we need a rational administrator to intercede. Thanks!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marylandwizard ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
-Note:I was planning to hand these out on the 22 of Dec. Happy holidays — ¡ Rand fan ! Sign here? 23:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
←Archive 2 ( 51 - 100) | Khukri's talk archive 3 (101 - 150). Please do not modify | Archive 4 ( 151 - 200)→ |
Hmm. I see what you mean. Nope, I just goofed it up, I guess. Duh. Thanks for nailing him/her/it. Gzuckier 13:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey there! You may wanna pop by Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings, see if your ideas would fit in there. If you have already, disregard my suggestion :) -- Sagaciousuk ( talk) 14:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I have responded here: [1]. Thanks for taking initiative on this. Kukini 15:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Khukri! Yes, excellent idea. I'll try to look at it more later when I'm home from work (and after the bottle of wine that I know that needs emptying, is indeed emptied, lol). While RC-patrolling one of my frustrations was needing to reach for a template that fit an exact situation, and not finding one, or finding one where the wording was wrong: either too harsh, or not quite to the point. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Yeh, sorry about that. So you are revamping all the warnings? Sounds interesting. Hmm, don't know why my bot edited it, should've skipped it. If it happens again tell me, hopefully it shouldn't.-- Andeh 14:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
With user warnings, I have a thing in my monobook that shows up some buttons to automatically instert templates when editing a users talk page. -- A dam1213 Talk + 08:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand ( talk • contribs • Bot) 19:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I will most certainly give out the templates, however as I am not an active RC patroller, I won't be searching thru the warners; instead, I'll use WP:AIV, look at the people who are recently-warning the vandals listed, then do it. I'll check AIV probably every 20-30mins, to spam all the warners from the new entries. Cheers, Daniel . Bryant 09:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, Khukri - you've got me into a good WikiProject there! SunStar Net 11:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your message. Are these warnings available to look at? If they are what is the page? Thanks. -- Alex ( Talk) 11:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
just got a message about how i edited an article on osmosis. im here to clarify that not only do our IPs not match whatsoever, that i also dont know anyone by the name of Ed!
edit: i can now see the IP history and it seems that, while ive worked on other articles, im using the vandals IP address. i suppose i should use an account then —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.8.126 ( talk • contribs)
Hi - thanks for the info and the links -- I'll take a look at it later :) M a rtinp23 14:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I noted that you gave the above editor a final warning for vandalism some time ago. Please note his recent vandalism to the article Kitten. I will revert the vandalism as soon as I am through sending this message to you. Thank you. Badbilltucker 14:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!!! -- M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ( T | C | @) 14:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for that information Khukri, much appreciated. I'll check out the links tomorrow (tis getting late here in Aus:)). Cheers, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 14:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thanks but I had it under control Betacommand ( talk • contribs • Bot) 15:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I'll get right on that. From your messages here, it looks like you've been spreading the word, too!
It's awesome that the standardization is moving along so nicely.
Have a good day, sir! :)
Srose (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me about the project. I know it's brand new but I have to say that, although I do know about test templates and such, I found the discussions impossible to navigate or, in most cases, even comprehend. For instance, the harmonisation page starts with a very cryptic vote. I hope I'm not sounding too rash or overly-critical here, it's really not my intention: I think it's a great initiative and would like to get involved to some extent but right now I can't because, well, I just don't understand what's what in the project pages. Pascal.Tesson 16:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
You deleted my entry for 'fomp' because it qualified as a dictionary term? In all actuality I specifically added that it had no place in a dictionary as it was a questionable word with multiple meanings and a background. You deleted it much too soon and without hesitation. -- Icedevil6 21:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
On behalf of the Southwest School Corperation, I am sorry for my fellow classmates' vandalization of Wikipedia. I will tell our technology cooridinator about this problem. Please contact the school corperation offices at http://www.swest.k12.in.us/ if further problems arise.
You have a reply waiting for you at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Admin coaching The Transhumanist 18:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Slave codes. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 21:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Ahhh ,,, I don't edit *any* Wikipedia articles (OK, maybe I correct a typo or two). I will occasionally leave comments in "Talk" and people can listen to them or not as they please. I don't recall even *reading* the slave codes article. What was posted?
Is someone impersonating me? I wrote an online US Civil War history that was not entirely flattering to the Southern Confederacy and there could be a motive for targeting me.
Comments would be appreciated. If no comments are forthcoming, then simply remember that any vandalism to Wikipedia articles is not coming from me. MrG (Greg Goebel)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.227.254.109 ( talk • contribs)
I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae' blis 23:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I must admit that I was quite disappointed to see that you withdrew; whilst additional criticism apropos of your perceived lack of substantive mainspace contributions may perhaps have betided, I don't think it to have been clear that your request would have been unsuccessful. For my part, I was altogether happy to see a candidate for adminship who seemed well to understand what qualities are rather auspicious in a prospective admin, and I think your replies to Oleg and me, inter al., evidenced the sound judgment and deliberative temperament for which most users look in a candidate for adminship (which judgment, I suppose, was also demonstrated by your withdrawal, to the extent that such withdrawal sought to prevent the community from having to partake of an RfA that was ostensibly [at least in the views of some] destined to produce no consensus). I cannot imagine that the net effect on the project of your becoming an admin would have been other-than-positive, and so I think it fair to say that the net effect of your withdrawal is negative. Best of wishes in any event... :) Joe 22:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Could you clarify why you chose delete instead of Transwikification? The transwikification won't have any ill effects on the quality of the pike article and still removes the material from Wikipedia while putting it where it belongs (on WikiBooks). - Mgm| (talk) 11:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
I must say that I also was sorry to see you withdraw so quickly. RfA's certainly do have a tendency to snowball, and it is a shame when it happens to good editors. Despite the objections those who opposed your RfA, I hope you consider running again when the time is right. I am very impressed with your work and you obviously possess the demeanor and level-headedness that I look for in an admin. When the time comes, I would even be happy to nominate you, as I feel strongly that your RfA should have passed this time. -- Renesis ( talk) 19:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC) P.S. When I have a minute I will be working on the spam UWT's, and I would be happy to take care of any editing of the protected templates that you need. Just let me know.
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
For your efforts to help new users and encouragements. E104421 22:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
Hey, I see you seem to sort-of-run Wikipedia:Wikiproject user warnings. I would like to propose a standard for all user warnings -- can you point me to the preferred place to do that? Thanks, tgies 06:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Are you ready to get started?
The waiting time over at Admin coaching is long (some people have been waiting in line since July). I'm an admin coach with the project, and for my students I set up a group discussion page so that we could all learn from each other. The scope of this concept has expanded into the Virtual classroom, which is an open forum for the teaching and learning of advanced Wikipedia skills.
Anyone and everyone is welcome to participate, as a student, as a coach, or both. Every week or two a new major topic of discussion or classroom assignment is introduced, usually with a guest writer who presents his or her expertise on the current subject and who remains on hand to answer questions. Everyone is encouraged to participate in the discussions, such as sharing your expertise, asking and answering questions, etc.
The current topic of discussion is vandalism, and our guest writer is Budgiekiller.
All discussions are open-ended, so all previous discussion topics and classroom assignments are still there for viewing and further participation. There are also sections for posting miscellaneous topics and questions, requesting coaching assistance, etc.
In addition to inviting those who would like to learn, I routinely invite experts from all over Wikipedia to come and contribute for the benefit of all. The VC is rapidly turning into a clearing house of the best resources, methods, and techniques known for working on Wikipedia.
You are cordially invited to participate.
Here's an announcement box which you can place on your userpage or at the top of your talk page for keeping up to date with classroom assignments.
I hope to see you there. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 08:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't vandalising it, I wanted to put a deletion tag on it, I don't know how to as it has been nominated before. Can you help me? 86.20.53.195 18:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Khukri. According to our request page, you are at or near the top of the list. Would you still like a coach? If so I will match you with one. Please let me know. Thanks! -- Fang Aili talk 18:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Saw it and blocked immediately :) Thanks for letting me know anyway Glen 19:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm want you to know that if this user keeps it up with his lies about me on his user/discussion page and you continue to condone it I will resort to Legal action to solve the problem. The guy is a political hack for the mayor of Reading, PA, and is resorting to character smears. This does not belong on Wikipedia, and he needs to take it elsewhere. Thank You. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mheckman1978 ( talk • contribs) 02:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC).
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page.Your Patrols have been very good.It is due to people like that Wikipedia goes on.Keep it up and thank you.
1:There is a page called Periyar Ramasami .Here It is potentially libellous allegations without any any citations which I have asked for.The wording are not encyclopedic. Periyar being likened to Hitler is potentially libellous as Hitler was responsible for millions of deaths whereas Periyar was not guilty or accused of even one. Please go through this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periyar_Ramasami#Leader_of_Dravidar_Kazhagam Can I remove comments like those ? This Page has been vandalised many times the last one by
2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hereditary_Education_Policy This has been vandalised by the same person from 3 IP address
Please refer to this http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Harlowraman&diff=94068203&oldid=94063562 The user wants the page deleted.I requested the user to do Positive edit and he wants Government relating to documents from 1952 now all government documents,Cabinet decisions of all policies taken prior to the Computer/internet era are not available online and worldwide and you can check the government site http://www.tn.gov.in/government.htm . I requested him to Please do a positive edit by describing your point of view regarfor this http://www.tn.gov.in/government.htm ding the Educational system reforms of Rajaji between 1952-1954 and not Negative edits ie by removing content as it has been done 6 timesbut even today it was vandalised.Please help
can I have this page protected ? Thanks again for your help. Harlowraman 17:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey man,
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Nice to see somebody on the ball even when I'm sound asleep. Maybe we'll run across each other in the future, since I do RC patrol, too. =) Have a great rest of your day! – Lantoka ( talk) 18:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
The previous entry on Blasted which I amended was, I think the work of a rather naive a-level student. Did you read it? It was naive and laughable. I think Sarah Kane and Wikipedia are worth rather more. It was also out of keeping with your other entries on her work. A very lengthy and not very accurate plot description. Feeble and inaccurate character analysis. A dimwitted attempt at summing up the 'meaning' of the play. This is not just my view. Read anything else that has been published about her. And compare it with this entry. I happen to think Sarah Kane is worth more. But keep it as it is, if you want. You just make Wikipedia look stupid, that's all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.70.138 ( talk • contribs)
My dear Khukri.
I'm terribly sorry to have offended you in any way.
I'm sure you're terribly over-worked.
My criticism was of the previous entry.
Not of you.
Why should I?
I don't know you.
By the way, the word is 'tenets' (of Wikipedia), not 'tenants' who are people who rent houses.
Lots of love and best wishes.
And do excuse me for having upset you.
It's hard life, isn't it?
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.141.70.138 (
talk •
contribs)
hey, srry idk who u are but i acidently deleted some info. om memory........srry again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.165.161.180 ( talk • contribs)
hi how do i creat a brand new page?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.134.206.95 ( talk • contribs)
Suggest you start here. Regards Khukri ( talk . contribs) 23:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting my vandalized userpage. [2] :-) ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 16:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
My edits on Joshua are legitimate. I'm moving the etymology section to the bottom of the page, as should be done. 71.76.219.92 22:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.
Thanks! -- Vox Causa 22:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reminding me about that project. I will take a better look at it when I am not falling asleep (late here). Best, Kukini 08:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Khukri,
Thank you for your message. I am a student and the change is a part of major reorganization of the topic under law school faculty supervision. The topic is to be further developed and I hope it might become a good contribution to the project. Please do not revert the changes, if you feel that the provided information is not accurate, may you please contact me?
Thank you.
Sincerely, Osghall —Preceding unsigned comment added by Osghall ( talk • contribs)
I have replied to you on my talk page. This message is in case you don't have my talk page on your watchlist, or you are an IP who doesn't have a watchlist. T e ckWiz Talk Contribs @
Make templates for redlinks? is that the idea? Anyplace in particular you want attention, or did you want to assign me a chunk? KillerChihuahua ?!? 15:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
I deleted the section on Misandry in Literature because I've proven that at least one of the quotes from the Fatherhood Coalition is taken so far out of context that it seems to say the opposite of what it originally meant. I doubt this is unintentional. The Misandry in Literature section consists of quotes from the Fatherhood Coalition, so the whole thing is suspect. It's not NPOV and it's not good research. Please note the discussion on the talk page. 06:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.118.65.208 ( talk • contribs)
This is from the guy who was vandalising "Ben 10's" page: I am Ben 10. I just don't bother to log on most of the time. I will do so more often now to avoid confusion. I was trying to get rid of a glitch with my User Boxes. ( Ben 10) 16:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Can you look into (and past the really stinko template that began the discussion complete with tfd talk) the discussion on
User talk:Fabartus/Wet noodle award which is aimed more at editor reminders, vice problem edit policing. You've attracted some significant talent there, and I'd appreciate it if you'd all consider attacking unnecessary time waste into your integration edits.
Since this was somewhat off to the side of your main focus, I thought you should consider whether a link be made to your project pages. Thanks //
Fra
nkB
16:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the entry for Napa Chic. A user named User:Calton keeps wanting to delete it. I think he is just being weird about it. All very odd, but we need a rational administrator to intercede. Thanks!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marylandwizard ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
-Note:I was planning to hand these out on the 22 of Dec. Happy holidays — ¡ Rand fan ! Sign here? 23:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)