Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Thind, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Downforwiki ( talk) 14:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
References
Downforwiki ( talk) 14:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
this is my last request to you about not vandalizing and using unconfirmed books written by non-natives as a source of information , i will undo whatever edits you make in a good faith to keep the name of Gurus untarnished as 7 of them belonged to Sodhi Khatri Clan
[1]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
17:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Khatri2903 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have been falsely blocked claiming that I am someone with another account, I was merely correcting an article which was vandalism in the first place as some other user just made an accusation and and got me banned and an admin undid my changes without considering to what i was pointing to, the article has a false information based on a single line of text in a book with no supplementary or primary source to confirm it. I also added multiple supplementary reliable sources like Britannica to as reference , I still got falsely banned. if you compare that article with any other source in the world that can not be edited or be a part of conspiracy via edits, it will reflect the information I was trying to change to. It's a request to unban and undo the changes of article "Sodhi" , thanks.
Decline reason:
I believe that the reason for the block is correct. It is possible that you yourself do not have more than one account, but that would only make this meat puppetry. You created your account almost immediately after the other account was blocked, this is difficult to accept as a coincidence, especially when editing about a formally designated contentious topic area(castes/South Asian social groups). 331dot ( talk) 07:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Khatri2903 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Notes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=A ban based on assumptions does no justice to someone who was merely correcting a vandalized article, I humbly request you to check my edits. I am only correcting my clan's name being linked with another tribe based on a single line of text from a book which also could be "coincidence", the line in context is also not primary information in the first place which also does not have any other supplementary source, The article also contains names of Gurus of my faith "Sikhism" which does no justice either. castes/social groups are sensitive topic i understand , that is why I was trying to edit with references from quality sources. we can only contribute to make it better. Thanks [[User:Khatri2903|Khatri2903]] ([[User talk:Khatri2903#top|talk]]) 14:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=A ban based on assumptions does no justice to someone who was merely correcting a vandalized article, I humbly request you to check my edits. I am only correcting my clan's name being linked with another tribe based on a single line of text from a book which also could be "coincidence", the line in context is also not primary information in the first place which also does not have any other supplementary source, The article also contains names of Gurus of my faith "Sikhism" which does no justice either. castes/social groups are sensitive topic i understand , that is why I was trying to edit with references from quality sources. we can only contribute to make it better. Thanks [[User:Khatri2903|Khatri2903]] ([[User talk:Khatri2903#top|talk]]) 14:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=A ban based on assumptions does no justice to someone who was merely correcting a vandalized article, I humbly request you to check my edits. I am only correcting my clan's name being linked with another tribe based on a single line of text from a book which also could be "coincidence", the line in context is also not primary information in the first place which also does not have any other supplementary source, The article also contains names of Gurus of my faith "Sikhism" which does no justice either. castes/social groups are sensitive topic i understand , that is why I was trying to edit with references from quality sources. we can only contribute to make it better. Thanks [[User:Khatri2903|Khatri2903]] ([[User talk:Khatri2903#top|talk]]) 14:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
It isn't an assumption that you created your account not long after the other account was blocked. That's documented in logs. Someone else will review your request. 331dot ( talk) 16:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Thind, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Downforwiki ( talk) 14:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
References
Downforwiki ( talk) 14:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
this is my last request to you about not vandalizing and using unconfirmed books written by non-natives as a source of information , i will undo whatever edits you make in a good faith to keep the name of Gurus untarnished as 7 of them belonged to Sodhi Khatri Clan
[1]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
17:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Khatri2903 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have been falsely blocked claiming that I am someone with another account, I was merely correcting an article which was vandalism in the first place as some other user just made an accusation and and got me banned and an admin undid my changes without considering to what i was pointing to, the article has a false information based on a single line of text in a book with no supplementary or primary source to confirm it. I also added multiple supplementary reliable sources like Britannica to as reference , I still got falsely banned. if you compare that article with any other source in the world that can not be edited or be a part of conspiracy via edits, it will reflect the information I was trying to change to. It's a request to unban and undo the changes of article "Sodhi" , thanks.
Decline reason:
I believe that the reason for the block is correct. It is possible that you yourself do not have more than one account, but that would only make this meat puppetry. You created your account almost immediately after the other account was blocked, this is difficult to accept as a coincidence, especially when editing about a formally designated contentious topic area(castes/South Asian social groups). 331dot ( talk) 07:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Khatri2903 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Notes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=A ban based on assumptions does no justice to someone who was merely correcting a vandalized article, I humbly request you to check my edits. I am only correcting my clan's name being linked with another tribe based on a single line of text from a book which also could be "coincidence", the line in context is also not primary information in the first place which also does not have any other supplementary source, The article also contains names of Gurus of my faith "Sikhism" which does no justice either. castes/social groups are sensitive topic i understand , that is why I was trying to edit with references from quality sources. we can only contribute to make it better. Thanks [[User:Khatri2903|Khatri2903]] ([[User talk:Khatri2903#top|talk]]) 14:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=A ban based on assumptions does no justice to someone who was merely correcting a vandalized article, I humbly request you to check my edits. I am only correcting my clan's name being linked with another tribe based on a single line of text from a book which also could be "coincidence", the line in context is also not primary information in the first place which also does not have any other supplementary source, The article also contains names of Gurus of my faith "Sikhism" which does no justice either. castes/social groups are sensitive topic i understand , that is why I was trying to edit with references from quality sources. we can only contribute to make it better. Thanks [[User:Khatri2903|Khatri2903]] ([[User talk:Khatri2903#top|talk]]) 14:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=A ban based on assumptions does no justice to someone who was merely correcting a vandalized article, I humbly request you to check my edits. I am only correcting my clan's name being linked with another tribe based on a single line of text from a book which also could be "coincidence", the line in context is also not primary information in the first place which also does not have any other supplementary source, The article also contains names of Gurus of my faith "Sikhism" which does no justice either. castes/social groups are sensitive topic i understand , that is why I was trying to edit with references from quality sources. we can only contribute to make it better. Thanks [[User:Khatri2903|Khatri2903]] ([[User talk:Khatri2903#top|talk]]) 14:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
It isn't an assumption that you created your account not long after the other account was blocked. That's documented in logs. Someone else will review your request. 331dot ( talk) 16:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)