![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Kethrus, You mention that the article lacks a lead section. I could write one that links this page to the Adaptation to global warming page. /info/en/?search=Adaptation_to_global_warming Do you think that would be a good idea? Jellyfish343 ( talk) 21:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, please visit to my talk page regarding to your message. I leave there a reply message for you. Tnx
Mystywave18 (
talk)
08:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, In regards to your response, may I ask to you Kethrus if do so, give me some suggestions from you if what will be the correct & right sentence to the phrase " which is very common and popular by most good-looking & handsome men to do dubsmash"? How can I make construct of it??? Please make some more response what should be the right sentence? The explanation of it is, he is the most popular man who gain popularity in dubsmash in the Philippines especially the track "Twerk It Like Miley" among the other good-looking men. Tnx. -- Mystywave18 ( talk) 08:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
@ Mystywave18: I'd much rather you read the article for words like 'handsome' and 'good-looking', instead of me pointing out every little detail that's wrong with it. I'm not here to edit for you, I'm here to help you. You'll not be able to learn how to speak neutrally if I just point out a sentence and you only change that sentence. Please also read WP:NPOV and WP:PEA. -- Kethrus |talk to me 09:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kethrus,
8 days ago I was looking for advises for my first article submission on the Wikipedia IRC channel and talked to you. Thank you for all the remarks you provided.
One of the issues was too high number of primary sources (which I reduced since then). This caused you to overlook the secondary sources and you declined the submission on the grounds of lack of notability. Later we (together with another user - JA95) went through the references and established that several of them fulfill Wikipedia's requirement for independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject (here they are #: 2, 11, 13, 14; I also added #1 later). The rest of the references, probably do not fulfill all the requirements, but (together with Google/Bing/Wikipedia search) do provide some hints on the significance of the subject. Both of us had no more time back then and left the draft as it was. I have resubmitted the article but now I'm afraid that new reviewer might rely on your decision wrongly assuming that you checked all the sources and found them unfit. S/He will see that no new references have been added to the article and decline it again.
Maybe you would agree to resolve this situation in one of the following ways?
Thank you! SimulaModel ( talk) 09:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
The intention is to provide only that information which makes universl sense. Edited the article to stick to the facts. Let me know if you think I have missed the point. Thanks for reviewing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KritsVoice ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
~~~~
so I know who's contacted me. Thanks! --
Kethrus |talk to me
08:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Hello again. Can you tell me how one contacts the reviewer who left the tag: This biographical article needs additional citations for verification, as a more targeted directive is needed to address the issue. That is, I'm confused about what s/he is looking for, since all claims are linked to peer-reviewed journal articles and professional websites. Thanks, Margery — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.115.137.115 ( talk) 13:52, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
~~~~
--
Kethrus |talk to me
13:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Kethrus, You mention that the article lacks a lead section. I could write one that links this page to the Adaptation to global warming page. /info/en/?search=Adaptation_to_global_warming Do you think that would be a good idea? Jellyfish343 ( talk) 21:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, please visit to my talk page regarding to your message. I leave there a reply message for you. Tnx
Mystywave18 (
talk)
08:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, In regards to your response, may I ask to you Kethrus if do so, give me some suggestions from you if what will be the correct & right sentence to the phrase " which is very common and popular by most good-looking & handsome men to do dubsmash"? How can I make construct of it??? Please make some more response what should be the right sentence? The explanation of it is, he is the most popular man who gain popularity in dubsmash in the Philippines especially the track "Twerk It Like Miley" among the other good-looking men. Tnx. -- Mystywave18 ( talk) 08:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
@ Mystywave18: I'd much rather you read the article for words like 'handsome' and 'good-looking', instead of me pointing out every little detail that's wrong with it. I'm not here to edit for you, I'm here to help you. You'll not be able to learn how to speak neutrally if I just point out a sentence and you only change that sentence. Please also read WP:NPOV and WP:PEA. -- Kethrus |talk to me 09:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kethrus,
8 days ago I was looking for advises for my first article submission on the Wikipedia IRC channel and talked to you. Thank you for all the remarks you provided.
One of the issues was too high number of primary sources (which I reduced since then). This caused you to overlook the secondary sources and you declined the submission on the grounds of lack of notability. Later we (together with another user - JA95) went through the references and established that several of them fulfill Wikipedia's requirement for independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject (here they are #: 2, 11, 13, 14; I also added #1 later). The rest of the references, probably do not fulfill all the requirements, but (together with Google/Bing/Wikipedia search) do provide some hints on the significance of the subject. Both of us had no more time back then and left the draft as it was. I have resubmitted the article but now I'm afraid that new reviewer might rely on your decision wrongly assuming that you checked all the sources and found them unfit. S/He will see that no new references have been added to the article and decline it again.
Maybe you would agree to resolve this situation in one of the following ways?
Thank you! SimulaModel ( talk) 09:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
The intention is to provide only that information which makes universl sense. Edited the article to stick to the facts. Let me know if you think I have missed the point. Thanks for reviewing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KritsVoice ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
~~~~
so I know who's contacted me. Thanks! --
Kethrus |talk to me
08:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Hello again. Can you tell me how one contacts the reviewer who left the tag: This biographical article needs additional citations for verification, as a more targeted directive is needed to address the issue. That is, I'm confused about what s/he is looking for, since all claims are linked to peer-reviewed journal articles and professional websites. Thanks, Margery — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.115.137.115 ( talk) 13:52, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
~~~~
--
Kethrus |talk to me
13:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)