Welcome!
Hello, Kelvintjy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Allen4
names 05:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
SamuraiCast and JEFusion are not reliable sources because they are fansites. Also it's April Fools' Day, so don't believe anything that anyone is claiming is official today.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 19:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Can you help me delete the photo of the gohonzon in the Sōka Gakkai as the user named Catflap08 keep restoring the picture. I also do not want to be blame for vandalism on that article.
According to my Buddhist believe, photographing of the Gohonzon are discouraged because the resulting copies can be easily desecrated, abused, or misused.
-- Kelvintjy ( talk) 15:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
The information about the architects' opinions on the destruction of Shōhondō reflects Sōka Gakkai bias and does not, in my opinion, merit placement on the page. --Scandiescot — Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 13 September 2013
You recently reverted one of my edits but you didn't use an edit summary or open a discussion in Talk. Can you please explain why you reverted my edit? In other words, what is it about the cited source that makes you believe that it's (a) reliable and (b) noteworthy enough to include in an encyclopedia article? Have any scholars or experts ever used that ranking or written favorably about it or is it just one of dozens of new rankings that proliferate on the Internet as people try to proclaim themselves experts whose products we should purchase? ElKevbo ( talk) 16:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Prolog. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Club of Rome, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the
verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a
"fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an
inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the
burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Prolog (
talk) 18:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 film), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD
v2.0 17:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
I know you have edited the section on "educational activities" on the Soka Gakkai page. Are you the one responsible for the new " Soka Education System" page? If so - nice going. If not -- check it out. Thanks. -- Daveler16 ( talk) 20:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip. I'll check it out. You know, Hardly ANYTHING in the N Shoshu entry has a valid reference. -- Daveler16 ( talk) 17:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
This is the second time you've added numerous superfluous references to the Soka Gakkai article. Please read WP:CITEKILL and adhere to it moving forward. Three or four is more than enough. wound theology ◈ 06:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
GrayStorm(
Complaints Dept.|
My Contribs.) 01:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
It is fine if you object to the redirect. But you need to discuss exactly why you object to it when reverting. wound theology ◈ 11:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Kelvintjy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Allen4
names 05:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
SamuraiCast and JEFusion are not reliable sources because they are fansites. Also it's April Fools' Day, so don't believe anything that anyone is claiming is official today.— Ryulong ( 竜龙) 19:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Can you help me delete the photo of the gohonzon in the Sōka Gakkai as the user named Catflap08 keep restoring the picture. I also do not want to be blame for vandalism on that article.
According to my Buddhist believe, photographing of the Gohonzon are discouraged because the resulting copies can be easily desecrated, abused, or misused.
-- Kelvintjy ( talk) 15:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
The information about the architects' opinions on the destruction of Shōhondō reflects Sōka Gakkai bias and does not, in my opinion, merit placement on the page. --Scandiescot — Preceding undated comment added 10:04, 13 September 2013
You recently reverted one of my edits but you didn't use an edit summary or open a discussion in Talk. Can you please explain why you reverted my edit? In other words, what is it about the cited source that makes you believe that it's (a) reliable and (b) noteworthy enough to include in an encyclopedia article? Have any scholars or experts ever used that ranking or written favorably about it or is it just one of dozens of new rankings that proliferate on the Internet as people try to proclaim themselves experts whose products we should purchase? ElKevbo ( talk) 16:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Prolog. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Club of Rome, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the
verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a
"fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an
inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the
burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Prolog (
talk) 18:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 film), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD
v2.0 17:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
I know you have edited the section on "educational activities" on the Soka Gakkai page. Are you the one responsible for the new " Soka Education System" page? If so - nice going. If not -- check it out. Thanks. -- Daveler16 ( talk) 20:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip. I'll check it out. You know, Hardly ANYTHING in the N Shoshu entry has a valid reference. -- Daveler16 ( talk) 17:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
This is the second time you've added numerous superfluous references to the Soka Gakkai article. Please read WP:CITEKILL and adhere to it moving forward. Three or four is more than enough. wound theology ◈ 06:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
GrayStorm(
Complaints Dept.|
My Contribs.) 01:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
It is fine if you object to the redirect. But you need to discuss exactly why you object to it when reverting. wound theology ◈ 11:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)