Hey Kellymoat, wasn't there a consensus against removing this wording on Jay Z and Kanye articles? This editor appears to have done so at Yeezus as well. Ss 112 08:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I was wondering if you could help me out. Currently, The "The Life of Pablo" page only includes one of the two album covers. There was a time when it included both. Since I am a new user, I am having trouble figuring out how to add the secondary (is it really) cover back since it deserves to be there -- he never changed the cover, just released an alternate. I would also suggest that the primary cover for the album returns to the original cover ( https://rapdose.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/image-8.jpeg), since, again, the current cover on the page is, in his words, "another" one. I understand that TIDAL eventually changed the cover to the alternate one (as did every other streaming service/his website), but it makes more sense to have Kanye's official cover be the first one seen when looking at the page. One of the primary conceptual elements of the album is its state of flux. I'm happy to hear you out if you disagree! Zlernersinsheimer ( talk) 01:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zabboo ( talk) 11:15, 8 July 2017 (PST)
Hi User:Kellymoat, after Jungle Rules is released on Friday 14th, if you've got time, can you be on the lookout for genres from post-release reviews please, some of which might mention the genre of lead single " Unforgettable" also, cheers.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 18:22, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 21:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Zabboo ( talk) 23:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately that's the only source that talks about the song being taken from the Rosso Sisters. It's quite credible considering there's a link showing the exact same song by the British group in 2014. There's only forums that talk about the two songs and they can't be used. We aren't going to just let TLC be seen as the originators of this song and I doubt there will be a source to officially claim the Rosso Sisters as the originators since they were never that big musically to begin with and quickly vanished as they came to be. - Jabrona ( talk) 23:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Zabboo ( talk) 17:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Per my final warning here. For your fourth (or fifth now?) violation of 3RR, you are blocked for a month. Stop edit warring. Sergecross73 msg me 02:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Is there a way to permanently block this person? unsigned comment from 108.53.9.75 22:50, 23 July 2017
In my absense, do you know who else has made the same edits as me on the same pages as me...
User:Binksternet - his name appears as the most recent editor on 11 pages on my watch list. User:DoRD - his name appears as the most recent editor on 14 pages on my watch list. I haven't seen User:JesseRafe in quite awhile. But with me not here to revert edits, look who has picked up some of my slack. User:SummerPhDv2.0's name is quite active on pages I watch.
Are all of them socks too?
How can you call yourself an admin when you even entertain the idea that obvious socks/vandals put in your head.
The fact that other people are making the same edits on the same pages simply shows you that those edits need to happen. Kellymoat ( talk) 11:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
I got "angry", because out of no where someone comes and starts asking me about my identity. That is the kind of stuff that makes you go hmm. It wasn't until later when I opened up your history that I saw that someone else had initiated it. A certain someone who I had reverted earlier that day. And yes, they have included multiple names. Tangojaded ( talk) 13:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
This is now an indefinite CheckUser block.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Turnpiketroubadors.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Marty Stuart, Compadres Anthology.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:25, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey Kellymoat, wasn't there a consensus against removing this wording on Jay Z and Kanye articles? This editor appears to have done so at Yeezus as well. Ss 112 08:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I was wondering if you could help me out. Currently, The "The Life of Pablo" page only includes one of the two album covers. There was a time when it included both. Since I am a new user, I am having trouble figuring out how to add the secondary (is it really) cover back since it deserves to be there -- he never changed the cover, just released an alternate. I would also suggest that the primary cover for the album returns to the original cover ( https://rapdose.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/image-8.jpeg), since, again, the current cover on the page is, in his words, "another" one. I understand that TIDAL eventually changed the cover to the alternate one (as did every other streaming service/his website), but it makes more sense to have Kanye's official cover be the first one seen when looking at the page. One of the primary conceptual elements of the album is its state of flux. I'm happy to hear you out if you disagree! Zlernersinsheimer ( talk) 01:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zabboo ( talk) 11:15, 8 July 2017 (PST)
Hi User:Kellymoat, after Jungle Rules is released on Friday 14th, if you've got time, can you be on the lookout for genres from post-release reviews please, some of which might mention the genre of lead single " Unforgettable" also, cheers.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 18:22, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 21:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Zabboo ( talk) 23:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately that's the only source that talks about the song being taken from the Rosso Sisters. It's quite credible considering there's a link showing the exact same song by the British group in 2014. There's only forums that talk about the two songs and they can't be used. We aren't going to just let TLC be seen as the originators of this song and I doubt there will be a source to officially claim the Rosso Sisters as the originators since they were never that big musically to begin with and quickly vanished as they came to be. - Jabrona ( talk) 23:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Zabboo ( talk) 17:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Per my final warning here. For your fourth (or fifth now?) violation of 3RR, you are blocked for a month. Stop edit warring. Sergecross73 msg me 02:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Is there a way to permanently block this person? unsigned comment from 108.53.9.75 22:50, 23 July 2017
In my absense, do you know who else has made the same edits as me on the same pages as me...
User:Binksternet - his name appears as the most recent editor on 11 pages on my watch list. User:DoRD - his name appears as the most recent editor on 14 pages on my watch list. I haven't seen User:JesseRafe in quite awhile. But with me not here to revert edits, look who has picked up some of my slack. User:SummerPhDv2.0's name is quite active on pages I watch.
Are all of them socks too?
How can you call yourself an admin when you even entertain the idea that obvious socks/vandals put in your head.
The fact that other people are making the same edits on the same pages simply shows you that those edits need to happen. Kellymoat ( talk) 11:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
I got "angry", because out of no where someone comes and starts asking me about my identity. That is the kind of stuff that makes you go hmm. It wasn't until later when I opened up your history that I saw that someone else had initiated it. A certain someone who I had reverted earlier that day. And yes, they have included multiple names. Tangojaded ( talk) 13:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
This is now an indefinite CheckUser block.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Turnpiketroubadors.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Marty Stuart, Compadres Anthology.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:25, 16 March 2018 (UTC)